Cegid vs Work.com comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cegid Logo
691 views|495 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Salesforce Logo
2 views|1 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cegid and Work.com based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Cloud HCM.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud HCM Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine.""The solution has a great payroll engine.""The support team were friendly and work in a systematic way. When contacting support you are able to add a level of priority to your case which is always respected by their team.""The tool provides a lot of options.""Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us.""The most valuable feature is you can customize every type of payroll calculation that you have.""The most valuable features of Meta4 are payroll and resource recruitment. However, all of the features in the human resource system are useful."

More Cegid Pros →

"We have found value in Work.com because it gave us a central place for capturing any opportunities-related information, such as client-related information. Additionally, it is a place for storing this information. Anyone in the organization, if it was being updated actively by the people or by the sales team, could have access to it. Once the contact information is there about any client, then it stays there. If you are approaching a client, you are able to check if there's any history. It's a good tool, but it all depends on how disciplined the sales team is in entering the information regularly."

More Work.com Pros →

Cons
"The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement.""The solution is a little bit slow.""The user interface could be improved and the maintenance is complex when it comes to upgrades.""In future releases, it would be useful to see reporting lines of all the team members in our business to understand who reports to whom.""training and performance could be improved.""I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution.""Meta4 could improve by allowing users to manage things by themself.""The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well."

More Cegid Cons →

"I found Work.com a bit clunky. There were too many fields, but maybe that was the design. It could be company-specific to me. There were overlapping fields and sometimes it was confusing."

More Work.com Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Meta4 requires annual maintenance that needs to be paid for."
  • "From a cost perspective, I think this is a well-balanced option."
  • More Cegid Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud HCM solutions are best for your needs.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Overall, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.
    Top Answer:The tool provides a lot of options.
    Top Answer:From a cost perspective, I think this is a well-balanced option.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    16th
    out of 68 in Cloud HCM
    Views
    691
    Comparisons
    495
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    227
    Rating
    6.7
    Views
    2
    Comparisons
    1
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    SAP SuccessFactors logo
    Compared 42% of the time.
    SAP HCM logo
    Compared 18% of the time.
    Workday logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    UKG logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    BambooHR logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Also Known As
    TalentSoft, Meta4
    Learn More
    Overview

    We create innovative, purposeful business management solutions, designed to help professionals in retail and HR (pay and talent management), payroll, tax and CPAs, achieve their goals and make more possible.

    Today_s workplace requires a new approach to performance management. Rypple is a web-based social performance management platform that helps companies improve performance through social goals, continuous feedback and meaningful recognition.
    Sample Customers
    Aeroports de Paris, Arkadin, Ingenico Payment Services, Bollor_ Group, Bull, FDJ, Limagrain
    Varsity Spirit
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Engineering Company22%
    Non Tech Company22%
    Security Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Large Enterprise83%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise62%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud HCM
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Cloud HCM. Updated: April 2024.
    767,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cegid is ranked 16th in Cloud HCM with 12 reviews while Work.com is ranked 18th in Sales Performance Management. Cegid is rated 7.2, while Work.com is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Cegid writes "Facilitates reusability, loads massive data, and creates reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Work.com writes "Centralized management, useful information storage, but can feel clunky". Cegid is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, SAP HCM, Workday, UKG and BambooHR, whereas Work.com is most compared with Workday.

    We monitor all Cloud HCM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.