Digital.ai Release vs TeamCity comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Digital.ai Logo
774 views|419 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
JetBrains Logo
3,373 views|2,977 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Digital.ai Release and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Digital.ai Release vs. TeamCity Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of Digital.ai Release is its ability to communicate with various deployment systems, such as XLD and batch deployments, as well as integrate with tools, such as Flyway and Bamboo. We use Bamboo as our build orchestrator, and Digital.ai Release also integrates with Jira, another Atlassian solution. These capabilities make it a powerful tool for managing workflow, test automation, and other processes.""The solution can apply one template across multiple applications.""The orchestration, building the release, and then just executing it and managing that pipeline — the orchestration capabilities are great for that."

More Digital.ai Release Pros →

"I have not yet implemented the remote build feature, but this will be a big plus. We want to be able to build legacy products on a build agent without developers needing to have obsolete tool sets installed on their local PC.""TeamCity's GUI is nice.""The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine.""VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support.""The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications.""It provides repeatable CI/CD throughout our company with lots of feedback on failures and successes to the intended audiences via email and Slack.""TeamCity is very useful due to the fact that it has a strong plug-in system.""One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies."

More TeamCity Pros →

Cons
"The solution is a little bit expensive.""Digital.ai Release could improve by having a better plugin that works with Guardian that we use for mainframe migrations. If there could be an interface or plugin for Guardian that would be beneficial.""The backfill could be improved, we could automate that. Right now it's subjective — it's up to the lead developer's memory to remember to backfill."

More Digital.ai Release Cons →

"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US.""Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted.""The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain.""Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone)​ to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly.""REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings.""I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does.""If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users.""I need some more graphical design."

More TeamCity Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Overall, the price is just too high; especially considering we're in the middle of a pandemic."
  • "The solution's license includes all features."
  • More Digital.ai Release Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."
  • "The licensing is on an annual basis."
  • More TeamCity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis nowadays. The biggest difference upon initial inspection is that TeamCity is far more focused on validating individual commits rather than certain types of tests. Jenkins’ front page presents information that is simply not useful in a non-linear development environment, where people are often working in vastly different directions. How many of the previous tests passed/failed is not really salient information in this kind of situation. Running specific tests for individual commits on TeamCity is far more trivial in terms of interface complexity than Jenkins. TeamCity just involves clicking the ”…” button in the corner on any test type (although I wish it wasn’t so easy to click “Run” by accident). I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins out of the box. There’s a point at which you feel that if you have to scour the documentation to do anything remotely complex in an application, you’re dealing with a bad interface. One disappointing thing in both is that inter-branch merges improperly trigger e-mails to unrelated committers. I suppose it is fairly difficult to determine who to notify about failure in situations like these, though. It seems like TeamCity pulls up the… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution can apply one template across multiple applications.
    Top Answer:The solution's license includes all features. I have not compared pricing to other tools, but feel the solution is a little expensive.
    Top Answer:The solution is a little bit expensive.
    Top Answer:TeamCity is a very user-friendly tool.
    Top Answer:It's open source, however, if you want your solution to be deployed on their cloud or on the cloud in general without you being involved and having it and managed by them, there may be costs involved… more »
    Top Answer:It's just a tool that I used. I needed to deliver something, so I did. I wasn't looking at it in a way to criticize it or to optimize it. As a user, I need some more graphical design. For example, in… more »
    Ranking
    10th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    774
    Comparisons
    419
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    621
    Rating
    9.0
    6th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    3,373
    Comparisons
    2,977
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    574
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    XL Release, XebiaLabs XL Release
    Learn More
    Overview

    Automate, orchestrate, and gain visibility into your release pipelines at scale using Digital.ai Release, a release management tool that is designed for enterprises. Control and track releases, standardize processes, and bake compliance and security into your software release pipelines.

    TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

    Sample Customers
    3M, GE, John Deere, Deutsche Telekom, Cable & Wireless, Xerox, and Société Générale, Liberty Mutual, EA, Rabobank
    Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization45%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Insurance Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Non Tech Company7%
    Hospitality Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise48%
    Large Enterprise46%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business37%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Digital.ai Release vs. TeamCity
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Digital.ai Release vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Digital.ai Release is ranked 10th in Build Automation with 3 reviews while TeamCity is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 25 reviews. Digital.ai Release is rated 8.6, while TeamCity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Digital.ai Release writes "Effectively automates deployments and applies one template across applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans". Digital.ai Release is most compared with Jenkins, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Bamboo, IBM Rational Build Forge and Digital.ai Deploy, whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Harness and Tekton. See our Digital.ai Release vs. TeamCity report.

    See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.