Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamViewer vs. XenApp (Citrix Virtual Apps) and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,355 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
No issues with scalability. It is a fairly simple model. If I wanted to add five more, I would just buy five more people and licenses, apply the program to their computers, and give them their login.
The initial setup is easy. If you want the desktop program, you just download and install it.
It is very straightforward to set up, use, install, and transfer sessions.
If an issue happens, we're able to log in at the time that it happens and address it , so there's minimal downtime.
The ability see iOS devices helps us out a lot because the majority of our users are iOS device users.
it's very easy to use, it's very efficient.
The tech support person I spoke to was very knowledgeable about the product, and was straightforward with me about its capabilities. There was no fluff about the product. They basically said this is not available now and we're hoping to have it available in the third or fourth quarter. It was nice to talk to someone who was straightforward and knew about the product.
I have technicians all over, and not everybody is an expert in all areas. They are able to bring other expertise from different locations with the click of a mouse. They can invite in other technicians, so I can have most of the technicians collaborate on the same question, and that’s really amazing.
There have been a couple of times with the handy remote access feature, where I have been asked for something at eight o'clock on a Thursday evening and it is on my desk machine, but I am driving back to my office. With TeamViewer, I can just stay at my home machine, connect to my work machine, and get the data needed without having to drive back across town.
It was worth the investment. You can do file transfers and video calls with it. You can do a lot of copy paste stuff. E.g., if I have a file and want to place it on somebody's machine, I can just copy it off of mine and paste it right on their machine. I don't have to put it in a Dropbox account and have them log into it to pull it off. I can do all that right through TeamViewer. When you're looking at the TeamViewer screen, you think you are working on your own machine.
TeamViewer allows us to do multiple controllers on a Host, which is great. We have a lot of Macs in our organization, and TeamViewer being cross-platform is a good thing.
TeamViewer has a lot of options for deploying the Hosts, where you can mass deploy them very easily, and you can pre-configure them.
It saves trips to customer sites, which saves time. I am able to get in there remotely and fix things.
The product and platform work well. That is why I have stay with them so long. The stability has typically been good.
The most valuable feature is you do not need to know the Windows username and password to connect and see the staff screen.
Our computers are spread amongst six physical locations. TeamViewer reduces the need to travel to those offices to help staff.
I found the ease of deployment, scalability, and security to be to our benefit when supplying virtual applications to our clients.
The shadow feature is extraordinary and helps a lot when supporting remote users.
The scalability is fine. We have about 400 users, who are supported by six staff members. We use the product company-wide throughout 40 different locations, and we currently do not have plans to increase the scale of use.
It has improved delivering applications to remote locations with its lower bandwidth utilization.
ICA/HDX optimization policies.
It virtualizes the application on your desktop.
It is user-friendly and easy to use.
The installation and maintenance are good.
Network browsing and connecting on the LAN, because if you can't see the computers on your network, what good is the product?
They need to improve their technical support.
it needs better iOS integration. It's still limited in its functionality when it comes to iOS. Currently, when you do something other than iOS, you're not able to take control of what's going on; instead of having to tell the user, "Click here, click there," I would like to have full control over an iOS device.
The one big problem that I have with LogMeIn Rescue is, I use a Mac. All my technicians use PCs. I use a Mac, and the Mac agent crashes at least once a day. I have to stop it and start it again. To date, I don’t have a problem with people using PC. I think the Mac app that they have needs to be improved.
They need to combine computer and mobile end-user support to be a more streamlined experience.
Secondly, the product needs improvement on mobile interfaces because on mobile devices it doesn't perform very well. On computers, it is good, with desktops, laptops, it is good. Sometimes iPad is good, but going with other devices, like Android or Windows on smart phones, it's always a problem.
You should be able to remote on an iPhone like you remote on an Android. It is not the same experience. Unless you are very savvy on iOS, you are pretty much lost.
The interface is not user-friendly. It looks a little outdated. I think the options are there. I think just the layout needs improvement.
On occasion, when remote connection process can't connect to a machine, the error messages aren't always helpful to tell you why you can't connect, as the message doesn't help troubleshoot whether it is too slow, too much interference, etc. I usually have to run to another computer and figure out what is going on, then restart it. The diagnostics could be improved.
If they could figure out a little better solution for the iOS stuff other than just a screen share, even though it's an Apple thing, and Apple doesn't like to give up control of their devices. If they ever got to that point, and I could manipulate an iPad or iPhone, that would be awesome. Since we have a bunch of iPad users who are struggling with doing different things, it would be nice to be able to just jump on and actually show them, "Here, do this, this, and this." Similar to what we do with the laptops, e.g. for training.
You can't configure multiple, unattended control passwords on the Mac. On the Mac, there's only one. On Windows, there are multiple unattended control passwords. I have people in different departments. My infrastructure people need to control a server and my developers may need to go into that same server. But I don't want them to have the same password... on the Mac, it can be done but it's extremely clunky and problematic.
Support for mobile devices from Linux has been missing since the Native client was rolled out. This was a nice option, especially when trying to walk somebody who was struggling to understand something on their phone.
The business interface is clunky and not well-documented.
It should have ability to display notes in the computer list.
There are a lot of shortfalls with supporting printing over XenApp.
Direct connection of USB devices on the terminals to be used by streamed applications is very important for printing and the usage of token authentication, but the current version does not support this one hundred percent.
The monitoring and management is in need of improvement.
Dependency on server virtualization after v7.x is an issue which I encountered in small environments.
There are many latency and slowness issues, which are things looked after by Citrix.
Scalability depends on the server and the number of users in the organization.
There have been many issues with stability.
Pricing and Cost Advice
The rescue model is licensed by user.
The pricing is worth the value.
It's definitely worth the value.
The cost of LogMeIn is high... I went with another product that was going to give me savings of 50%. One technician tested it, he gave us the thumbs up. Then once we moved all my technicians to it, but it didn’t work... Trying to move from LogMeIn hindered our performance and productivity and it was not worth the savings.
Pricing is reasonable and easily offsets other costs, while resolving issues in a much quicker timeframe.
It is on the medium to high side. For us, it is worth it. For the amount of time they save us, it pretty much pays for itself.
Look at the different plans they have. Do not pay for a plan you do not need.
The pricing is a little on the higher side, though.
It has probably saved us several thousands of dollars because we have quick access anywhere. We don't have to worry about finding people onsite or arranging conference calls. We also save time and money with it because we don't have to send somebody onsite to troubleshoot.
TeamViewer offers a free version to try. Download and give it a shot. See what it's like and if you like it, then buy the license for it.
The cost of the licenses depends on how you buy them. They just had a buy one get one free deal going, and they do that every once in a while. Where you buy one license, and they will give you the second one free, or you can try to get discounts. Most of our licenses that we have we tried to do something like that just to save some money.
TeamViewer pricing is reasonable... The simultaneous controller licensing model of TeamViewer - compared to LogMeIn’s controlled Host licensing model - seems to benefit us so far. We’re currently saving about 30 percent on licensing cost... The savings from licensing have been eaten up by the soft costs involved in dealing with and working around TeamViewer’s deficiencies in allowing granular control by multiple controllers, and the issues with the various settings that are missing on the macOS Host.
I suggest using the concurrent user licensing scheme.
I think it is a little high priced.
It is a bit costly, but enterprise class features come with a cost.
The licenses are affordable, but the support is a bit expensive, though worth the value.
The product, XenServer, is free to use, and XenApp has a one month free license.
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
LogMeIn Rescue delivers unparalleled remote IT support technology that allows enterprises to better manage mobile remote support and remote desktop support helping users across PC, Mac, iOS, Android support and more. Features include remote computer access, mobile app support, and the exciting Rescue Lens interactive video support feature that allows support technicians to see exactly what the end user can see. LogMeIn Rescue is truly on the cutting edge of the remote technical support industry.
|TeamViewer lets you connect to any PC or server around the world within a few seconds. Remote control a partners PC as if you were sitting in front of it. Available in over 30 languages, TeamViewer is one of the world's most popular providers of remote control and online meeting software. airbackup, a powerful cloud-based backup solution, and ITbrain, a valuable remote monitoring and IT asset tracking solution, complement TeamViewer's product portfolio.||XenApp solves IT challenges with scalable and secure application delivery by providing remote access to Windows apps and data over any network, on any device Ð and now enables employees to access Linux virtual desktops side-by-side with Windows resources for a complete workspace experience. As the only server-based computing solution that is Common Criteria certified and native FIPS 140-2 compliant, XenApp reduces the risk of data loss and prevents unwanted intrusions by delivering virtual apps and data as an on-demand service to users based on location- and device-specific features and security configurations.|
Learn more about LogMeIn Rescue
Learn more about TeamViewer
Learn more about XenApp (Citrix Virtual Apps)
|Lenovo, HTC, 3M, Accenture, IBM, HP, General Electric, Make-A-Wish, Vodafone, Zero Motorcycles, Arise, Fuji Xerox, Endsleigh Insurance, Fordham University, Hologic, Meineke, Motorola, Toyota, and more.||Porsche Informatik, Philips, DHL, Intel, Motorola, Microsoft, IBM, Siemens, Fujitsu, American Red Cross||Exelon, Aeronamic, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Alameda County Medical Center, Alaska Department of Fish & Game, Aloysius Stichting, Amarchand Mangaldas, AmBev, Amnet Technology Solutions, Arval|
Translation And Localization Position14%
Software R&D Company19%
Comms Service Provider7%
Marketing Services Firm5%
Software R&D Company14%
Financial Services Firm7%
No Data Available