We performed a comparison between Bitbar and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"Ability to use different frameworks."
"Easy to use and easily scalable."
"Visual Studio Test Professional's most valuable feature is the rich IDE for doing code and test development."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"The whole suite is made for .NET development."
"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."
"The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"The solution is very stable."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine."
"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."
"Sometimes, the product is too complex to use."
"Visual Studio Test Professional could improve by having better integration with external databases."
"I would appreciate some enhancements in the interface, maybe adding more color options."
"The data flow can be improved."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Bitbar is ranked 26th in Functional Testing Tools while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, SmartBear TestComplete, CrossBrowserTesting, Sauce Labs and LambdaTest, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText UFT One.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
