We performed a comparison between TestProject and Tricentis Tosca based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."
"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."
"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"The automation and AI are very good."
"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."
"This solution is easy to use for everybody, including those who are not IT-educated."
"Very user-friendly and the low code automation is really helpful."
"It's a simple tool, particularly in terms of system testing. You can also convert and automate using Tricentis Tosca with ease."
"The scalability is a valuable feature of Tricentis Tosca."
"The product enables codeless automation."
"The technical support is good, we were satisfied."
"This tool is very easy to use and I think that anyone can come in, having no experience with it, and within four to six months be comfortable with it."
"I am impressed with the product's script test."
"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."
"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."
"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."
"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."
"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."
"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."
"It needs better integration with JIRA."
"They can make it more stable. I have used this tool for SAP applications. They have an alliance with SAP, and it mostly worked fine, but there were a few glitches. However, we got the required support from the Tricentis team. They are coming up with their new versions and upgrades with respect to how the Tricentis systems as cloud applications are updated, and it would be good if they have a robust accelerator pack."
"Parallel execution is not yet implemented for Tosca. This means you can't execute the same test case on multiple machines remotely."
"Tricentis Tosca currently does not support any mobile testing and can be improved."
"Not being able to mask test data in relation to testing data management, in my opinion, is also a limitation."
"First, Tricentis could improve Tosca's Linux scripting. We can automate Linux scripting, but there are a few commands that Tosca doesn't support. DVS support and the object identification mechanism could also be better."
"The solution is expensive compared to other tools in the market."
"Tricentis Tosca could improve on its mobile automation solution."
TestProject is ranked 16th in Test Automation Tools with 6 reviews while Tricentis Tosca is ranked 1st in Test Automation Tools with 96 reviews. TestProject is rated 7.2, while Tricentis Tosca is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of TestProject writes "An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis Tosca writes "Does not require coding experience to use and comes with productivity and time-saving features ". TestProject is most compared with Katalon Studio, Testim and SmartBear TestComplete, whereas Tricentis Tosca is most compared with OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Worksoft Certify, Postman and SmartBear TestComplete. See our TestProject vs. Tricentis Tosca report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
