TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework vs Uniface comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework and Uniface based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
71
Comparisons
57
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
184
Comparisons
147
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework
Compuware Uniface
Learn More
Overview
The TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance product does not come with any user licenses. Customers will need to purchase either named user licenses, concurrent user licenses, or any mixture of the two as outlined below. Requires the customer to have a valid license for either the production or developer versions of the TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance product. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework provides design-time governance that includes everything required for service lifecycle management. Included in the platform are an SOA registry, metadata repository for service artifacts, service lifecycle management tools, service contract management, and design-time policy/validation management. The product also comes with a plug-in that allows Visual Studio or Eclipse developers to interact directly with registry or repository from their IDE.

Uniface’s model-driven, low-code methodology empowers developers to focus on high-value tasks like user experience and business logic integration, rather than basic coding. The result? New applications make it to market or into internal use faster and with less work than ever, removing barriers to innovation, creating fresh revenue streams and thrilling end users.

Sample Customers
Arbeitsmarktservice, Hangzhou Municipal Government, Harlow District Council, Social Security Administration, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
BMW, Boeing, Ford, Telmex, NTT Data, Kawasaki, Takt, FCS, MidlandHR, Dixons Carphone, DHL, Land Rover, 7Eleven
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework is ranked 34th in Application Infrastructure while Uniface is ranked 24th in Application Infrastructure. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework is rated 0.0, while Uniface is rated 0.0. On the other hand, TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework is most compared with , whereas Uniface is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.