• Home
  • TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework vs. WSO2 Carbon [EOL]

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework vs WSO2 Carbon [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework and WSO2 Carbon [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework?
Anonymous User
It allows you to deal with any mediation situation based on messages using concepts like proxy services and APIs.
The Data Services Server is a beautiful product which allows you to "expose" your data as REST and/or SOAP services secured or not using any of the... Read more →
Ranking
34th
out of 36 in Application Infrastructure
Views
67
Comparisons
53
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Application Infrastructure
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework
Carbon
Learn More
TIBCO
WSO2
Video Not Available
Overview
The TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance product does not come with any user licenses. Customers will need to purchase either named user licenses, concurrent user licenses, or any mixture of the two as outlined below. Requires the customer to have a valid license for either the production or developer versions of the TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance product. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework provides design-time governance that includes everything required for service lifecycle management. Included in the platform are an SOA registry, metadata repository for service artifacts, service lifecycle management tools, service contract management, and design-time policy/validation management. The product also comes with a plug-in that allows Visual Studio or Eclipse developers to interact directly with registry or repository from their IDE.

WSO2 Carbon redefines middleware by providing an integrated and componentized middleware platform that adapts to the specific needs of any enterprise IT project - on premise or in the cloud.

Sample Customers
Arbeitsmarktservice, Hangzhou Municipal Government, Harlow District Council, Social Security Administration, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Bdigital, M-creations, Yenlo, Codenvy, Ohio Automobile Club
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework is ranked 34th in Application Infrastructure while WSO2 Carbon [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework is rated 0.0, while WSO2 Carbon [EOL] is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Carbon [EOL] writes "It allows you to deal with any mediation situation based on messages using concepts like proxy services and APIs". TIBCO ActiveMatrix Lifecycle Governance Framework is most compared with , whereas WSO2 Carbon [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.