Compare TIBCO ActiveSpaces vs. Zulu Embedded

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
TIBCO ActiveSpaces Logo
64 views|43 comparisons
Zulu Embedded Logo
269 views|236 comparisons
Ranking
Views
64
Comparisons
43
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Views
269
Comparisons
236
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: October 2020.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 77% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Also Known As
ActiveSpaces
Learn
TIBCO
Azul Systems
Overview
TIBCO ActiveSpaces is a low-latency, secure, distributed, in-memory data storage technology that can also function as a system of record for terabytes of operational data. TIBCO ActiveSpaces on the one hand, stores it's data in memory on a cluster of machines for fast read access, and on the other hand, it provides distributed persistence on local file systems for very fast write performance.

Open Source Java for IoT & Embedded Systems.

Tired of high Java licensing costs, restrictive terms of use and proprietary vendor lock-in?

Azul is the world's largest commercial vendor delivering multi-platform, 100% open source OpenJDK builds targeting the embedded, IoT, and maker communities.

Offer
Learn more about TIBCO ActiveSpaces
Learn more about Zulu Embedded
Sample Customers
BVC (Columbia Stock Exchange), The LowryV2COMM
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: October 2020.
442,141 professionals have used our research since 2012.
TIBCO ActiveSpaces is ranked 33rd in Application Infrastructure while Zulu Embedded is ranked 24th in Application Infrastructure. TIBCO ActiveSpaces is rated 0.0, while Zulu Embedded is rated 0.0. On the other hand, TIBCO ActiveSpaces is most compared with , whereas Zulu Embedded is most compared with Azul Zulu and Azul Zing.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.