We performed a comparison between TIBCO BusinessWorks and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The OSGI console is available to debug different issues and get low level informations on the applications development, like bundle, dependencies, etc."
"XML to JSON transformations, out-of-the-box, helps to build REST services."
"The ability to link to different technologies is valuable to us."
"One of the most valuable features is that it's a simple development. It takes a short time to get services to work."
"The most valuable features are the stability and the time to market."
"Good performance and reliability."
"Areas for improvement would be the cloud fitness of the product and the ease of migrating to newer versions."
"The Business Studio interface based on SCA Standards helps to show the business logic at first look and improve code maintenance."
"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."
"The learning curve for this solution is very good."
"The solution has two main parts: integration and transformation. It's very user-friendly and easy to understand for everyone."
"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."
"The solution's customer service is good."
"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."
"The customer service executives are very responsive."
"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."
"The Business Studio tool can be improved, which is the tool for designing the processes. Improving the Business Studio tool will make this solution more stable. It has a steep learning curve, and it is pretty tough to learn."
"Scaling with the solution is costly because if we need to scale up, we have to buy more memory. That means more money. Solutions like Camel or Pulsar come with built-in options to scale horizontally, vertically, region-wide or country-wide."
"This solution's cloud could be improved. I don't know whether it was because we didn't have the internal expertise or if it was the product itself, but since they came later—I think only two or three years into the cloud—after many other iPaaS that had been in the cloud for longer, I feel that maybe they haven't matured in terms of the cloud."
"Though it is a stable product, if we have an issue with the product, it gets difficult, and it gets really difficult to explain the issue to the support team. Also, it takes a long time to get resolved."
"There are not many plugins available to integrate the databases. We have to write it in Java and integrate it. The developers should have more knowledge. These are the three main aspects that they could improve."
"A possible improvement could be to give the capability to use different profiles for each AppNode when an application is deployed on an AppSpace."
"They don't support out of the box - you have to buy adapters or you have to have the technology."
"Cloud fitness is lacking"
"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."
"In my opinion, the administration model and interface, of Carbon, are lacking in terms of its features and user experience."
"You cannot include the validation of XPath."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"If I have to buy software, then it becomes expensive for me."
"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."
"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."
"They should introduce better pricing for small companies."
TIBCO BusinessWorks is ranked 18th in Data Integration with 23 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 19th in Data Integration with 18 reviews. TIBCO BusinessWorks is rated 8.0, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of TIBCO BusinessWorks writes "Reliable integration solution with robust communication capabilities and good scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Consolidated, reliable, and has responsive technical support". TIBCO BusinessWorks is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Mule Anypoint Platform, Spring Cloud Data Flow, Confluent and SSIS, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, webMethods Integration Server and OpenESB. See our TIBCO BusinessWorks vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
