We performed a comparison between TIBCO Cloud Integration and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"I am really impressed by TIBCO's integration of any level of complexity."
"I like that it is a very good integration tool with many other things. TIBCO is very good for cloud integration"
"It integrates well with various servers."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."
"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."
"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."
"Ease of implementation and flexibility to hold the business logic are the most valuable features."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"The deployment was rather complicated."
"TIBCO Cloud Integration is not a user-friendly tool when it comes to the installation phase or for maintaining the systems since its architecture is really complex."
"Integrations could be better. Although integration is good, we have faced some block issues."
"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."
"It is quite expensive."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
"The learning curve is a little steep at first."
"The deployment should be simplified."
"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."
"A while ago, they were hacked, and it took them a very long time to open their website again in order to download any service packs or any features. I don't know what they could do differently. I know that they were vulnerable, and there was some downtime, but because they were down, we were unable to download any potential service packs."
"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
TIBCO Cloud Integration is ranked 17th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 3 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. TIBCO Cloud Integration is rated 8.4, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of TIBCO Cloud Integration writes "A product that is easy to install and offers good stability to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". TIBCO Cloud Integration is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration and Oracle Integration Cloud Service, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.