We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare TigerLogic XDMS vs. TileDB

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
TigerLogic XDMS Logo
12 views|7 comparisons
TileDB Logo
24 views|8 comparisons
Ranking
18th
Views
12
Comparisons
7
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
16th
Views
24
Comparisons
8
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
TigerLogic
Video Not Available
Overview
TigerLogic XDMS is an enterprise native XML database management server with both data- and document-centric capabilities. The TigerLogic XDMS difference comes from its core technology: a data model that is optimal for managing and storing any kind of XML or non-XML data and its extensible XQuery Engine.

TileDB, Inc. is a data management company founded to help Data Science teams make faster discoveries, by giving them a more natural way to store, analyze and share large sets of diverse data, so that they can stop wasting time working around performance limitations, inadequate data storage formats, and unfamiliar tooling.

Offer
Learn more about TigerLogic XDMS
Learn more about TileDB
Sample Customers
Arts Management Systems, Future Chalk Software, Tek Service Srl, Just Software bvba, Senex, Am_tiq AG, CNM, WigaSoft AG, 24 ore software, Abraxas Juris AG, TheDataManager, Catalina Software, The Conrad Company, ADJob Nordic AB, J+D Software, Enviro Data, The International Education and Training Corporation, 888 Software Products Srl, Instinct Systems
Azure, Lustre, hadoop

TigerLogic XDMS is ranked 18th in Non-Relational Databases while TileDB is ranked 16th in Non-Relational Databases. TigerLogic XDMS is rated 0.0, while TileDB is rated 0.0. On the other hand, TigerLogic XDMS is most compared with , whereas TileDB is most compared with .

See our list of best Non-Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Non-Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.