Toad Data Modeler vs VMware Postgres comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quest Software Logo
642 views|433 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
363 views|269 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Toad Data Modeler and VMware Postgres based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Database Development and Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Toad Data Modeler vs. VMware Postgres Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I found all features valuable and necessary in Toad Data Modeler, particularly how good the solution is for modeling, database schema generation, and database re-engineering. I also found Toad Data Modeler straightforward to use.""It is not feasible for small businesses. It is not used in a small company.""Auto-complete is the best feature of the solution."

More Toad Data Modeler Pros →

"The stability of this solution was very good.""The solution is stable."

More VMware Postgres Pros →

Cons
"The product should provide better debugging features.""It is not feasible for small businesses. It is not used in a small company.""Many users don't know how to add licensing to Toad, or where it is shown, so they could make that easier.""What could be improved in Toad Data Modeler is stability and the complex setup."

More Toad Data Modeler Cons →

"It doesn't have any GUI-based monitoring tools.""This solution struggled with multi-regional synchronization."

More VMware Postgres Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Though I'm not involved in the licensing for Toad Data Modeler, I believe it's per user and not cheap."
  • "Price-wise, the lesser it is, the better it is for me, especially in Egypt. I think that the licensing cost ranges from 1,000 to 9,000. Also, it includes maintenance and support for a year."
  • More Toad Data Modeler Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."
  • More VMware Postgres Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Auto-complete is the best feature of the solution.
    Top Answer:The query and design could be improved. The product should provide better debugging features. It should also be easy to set up.
    Top Answer:We have zero licensing costs. The solution is open-source.
    Top Answer:It doesn't have any GUI-based monitoring tools. Oracle has some proprietary tools for monitoring all the databases and all that. Postgres doesn't have any graphical capabilities where we can monitor… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    642
    Comparisons
    433
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    348
    Rating
    9.3
    Views
    363
    Comparisons
    269
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    504
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Toad
    Pivotal Postgres
    Learn More
    Overview

    Toad Data Modeler helps you create high-quality data models. This data modeling tool enables you to easily deploy accurate changes to data structures across more than 20 different platforms.

    Sample Customers
    Zions Bancorporation
    The world’s most versatile open-source database VMware Postgres is open-source PostgreSQL binaries, packaged and commercially supported.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Healthcare Company36%
    Logistics Company18%
    Marketing Services Firm9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government15%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Government8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Toad Data Modeler vs. VMware Postgres
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Toad Data Modeler vs. VMware Postgres and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Toad Data Modeler is ranked 9th in Database Development and Management with 18 reviews while VMware Postgres is ranked 16th in Database Development and Management with 2 reviews. Toad Data Modeler is rated 8.4, while VMware Postgres is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Toad Data Modeler writes "Along with an initial setup that is straightforward, the solution offers excellent support to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Postgres writes "A fully open source solution with high throughput and good serviceability, but it struggles with multi-regional synchronization". Toad Data Modeler is most compared with Oracle SQL Developer, IDERA ER/Studio, Aqua Data Studio, Redgate SQL Toolbelt and Toad Edge, whereas VMware Postgres is most compared with Nutanix Database Service, EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager, VMware Tanzu GemFire and Redgate SQL Toolbelt. See our Toad Data Modeler vs. VMware Postgres report.

    See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

    We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.