We performed a comparison between Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector and Trend Micro ScanMail based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Anti-Malware Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like that it is very user-friendly and easy to install."
"I would rate the solution's stability at ten out of ten."
"It can effectively monitor outbound and inbound devices."
"The most valuable feature of Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector is the simple analysis of phishing emails."
"I like that Trend Micro ScanMail is very effective and quite strong."
"The analysis part is good."
"What I like the most about Trend Micro ScanMail is its easiness."
"It does the job. Even when our clients have a very high rate of emails per second, there has been no problem."
"Its integration with mail platforms is valuable."
"The product's feature for message processing and blocking devices for bulk emails needs improvement."
"I would like to be able to send emails to a specific sandbox. This is a feature I would like to see added to the next release."
"It could be more user-friendly, easier to install, and lighter on the network. I would say that for all products because you do not need technical expertise to take care of it. When you have a user-friendly solution, it makes it easier for the vendors or companies like us. We do not have to go to the client's site to attend to issues all the time. Because it is user-friendly, they can take care of it after some training."
"Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector could improve by making it easier to use. Microsoft solutions are easier to use."
"ScanMail was one of the best solutions a few years ago, but it is no longer the best solution because of its old-fashioned management console. Customers associate it with something that is old because there is no change in the management console. It has old icons, and it is not fresh enough. It is also not easy to use or play with. The report engine is also old-fashioned. Customers want something easier, quicker, and cleaner."
"Its user interface is pretty old-fashioned, and sometimes, it's hard to find the features that you are looking for. The user interface definitely needs some improvement."
"The sandboxing part can be improved."
"The price could be better. I think it's pretty good compared to other solutions as far as the features are concerned. It basically covers most of the stuff which we require for email security. But it would be better if they made it a little cheaper and more cost-effective. That would make it easier for us to sell it."
"The weaknesses of Trend Micro ScanMail are that it doesn't fully protect ad-based web access and lacks proper security for Outlook, iOS, and web browser access."
More Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector is ranked 28th in Anti-Malware Tools with 4 reviews while Trend Micro ScanMail is ranked 27th in Anti-Malware Tools with 5 reviews. Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector is rated 7.4, while Trend Micro ScanMail is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector writes "Useful email analyzing, reliable, but setup could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro ScanMail writes "Integrates well with mail platforms, but the UI is pretty old-fashioned". Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector is most compared with , whereas Trend Micro ScanMail is most compared with Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Trend Micro Email Security, Fortinet FortiMail, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint and CrowdStrike Falcon. See our Trend Micro Deep Discovery Email Inspector vs. Trend Micro ScanMail report.
See our list of best Anti-Malware Tools vendors.
We monitor all Anti-Malware Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.