Compare Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS vs. WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service

Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS is ranked 12th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software with 3 reviews while WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service is ranked 17th in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software with 1 review. Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS is rated 7.4, while WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS writes "IPS signatures and the IPS database are much better than what is commonly available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service writes "Detect and prevent hacker attacks and has stable hardware and software ". Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Discovery Inspector, Cisco Sourcefire SNORT, McAfee Network Security Platform and Palo Alto Networks Threat Prevention, whereas WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service is most compared with .
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about GFI, Vectra AI, Darktrace and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It has reduced the time it takes to respond to attacks. That comes back to the proactive point. It makes us able to lower down in the kill chain, we can react now, rather than reacting to incidents that happened, we can see an instant, in some cases, as it's being implemented, or as it's being launched.One of the most valuable features is all the correlation that it does using AI and machine learning. An example would be alerting on a host and then alerting on other things, like abnormal behavior, that it has noticed coming from the same host. It's valuable because we're a very lean team.The solution provide visibility into behaviors across the full lifecycle of an attack in our network, beyond just the Internet gateway. It makes our security operations much more effective because we are now looking not just at traffic on the border, but we're looking at east-west internal traffic. Now, not only will we see if an exploit kit is being downloaded, but we would be able to see then if that exploit kit was then laterally distributed into our environment.Vectra produces actionable data using automation. That has helped us. It's less manpower now to look at incidents, which has definitely increased efficiency. Right now, in a lot of cases, our mean time to detection is within zero days. This tells me by the time something happened, and we were able to detect it, it was within the same day.The dashboard gives me a scoring system that allows me to prioritize things that I should look at. I may not necessarily care so much about one event, whereas if I have a single botnet detection or a brute force attack, I really want to get on top of those.It gives you access, with Recall, to instant visibility into your network through something like a SIEM solution. For us, being able to correlate all of this network data without having to manage it, has provided immediate value. It gives us the ability to really work on the stuff where I and my team have expertise, instead of having to manage a SIEM solution...The solution's ability to reduce alerts, by rolling up numerous alerts to create a single incident or campaign, helps in that it collapses all the events to a particular host, or a particular detection to a set of hosts. So it doesn't generate too many alerts. By and large, whatever alerts it generates are actionable, and actionable within the day.One of the most valuable features of the platform is its ability to provide you with aggregated risk scores based on impact and certainty of threats being detected. This is both applied to individual and host detections. This is important because it enables us to use this platform to prioritize the most likely imminent threats. So, it reduces alert fatigue follow ups for security operation center analysts. It also provides us with an ability to prioritize limited resources.

More Vectra AI Pros »

The IPS signatures and the IPS database that are given are much better than what is commonly available.The most valuable feature is the central command center, where we can control and manage the solution.The monitoring is the most valuable feature.

More Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS Pros »

The initial setup was straightforward and, because we only need intrusion detection and prevention, we needed only about four hours to deploy it.

More WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service Pros »

Cons
The false positives and the tuning side of it is something that could use improvement. But that could be from our side.It does a little bit of packet capture on alert so you can look at the packet capture activity going on, but it doesn't collect a whole lot of data. Sometimes it's only one or two frames, sometimes it does collect more. That's why they have the addition of their Recall platform, because that really does help expand the capability.Some of their integrations with other sources of data, like external threat feeds, took a bit more work than I had hoped to get integrated.I would like to see a bit more strategic metrics instead of technical data. Information that I could show to my executive management team or board would be valuable.I'd like to be able to get granular reports and to be able to output them into formats that are customizable and more useful. The reporting GUI is lacking.Some of the customization could be improved. Everything is provided for you as an easy solution to use, but working with it and doing specific development could be worked on a bit more in the scope of an incident response team.One thing which I have found where there could be improvement is with regard to the architecture, a little bit: how the brains and sensors function. It needs more flexibility with regard to the brain. If there were some flexibility in that regard, that would be helpful, because changing the mode of the brain is complex. In some cases, the change is permanent. You cannot revert it.You are always limited with visibility on the host due to the fact that it is a network based tool. It gives you visibility on certain elements of the attack path, but it doesn't necessarily give you visibility on everything. Specifically, the initial intrusion side of things that doesn't necessarily see the initial compromise. It doesn't see stuff that goes on the host, such as where scripts are run. Even though you are seeing traffic, it doesn't necessarily see the malicious payload. Therefore, it's very difficult for it to identify these type of host-driven complex attacks.

More Vectra AI Cons »

We need more integration. It would be good if Azure IPS and TippingPoint IPS and other products from Trend Micro like their DBI and IWSVA could talk between each other.I would like to see this solution more lightweight and easier to install.The firewall rules are limited.

More Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS Cons »

I would like to see faster automatation.

More WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
We have a desire to increase our use. However, it all comes down to budget. It's a very expensive tool that is very difficult to prove business support for. We would like to have two separate networks. We have our corporate network and PCI network, which is segregated due to payment processing. We don't have it for deployed in the PCI network. It would be good to have it fully deployed there to provide us with additional monitoring and control, but the cost associated with their licensing model makes it prohibitively expensive to deploy.At the time of purchase, we found the pricing acceptable. We had an urgency to get something in place because we had a minor breach that occurred at the tail end of 2016 to the beginning of 2017. This indicated we had a lack of ability to detect things on the network. Hence, why we moved quickly to get into the tool in place. We found things like Bitcoin mining and botnets which we closed quickly. In that regard, it was worth the money.The license is based on the concurrent IP addresses that it's investigating. We have 9,800 to 10,000 IP addresses.There are additional features that can be purchased in addition to the standard licensing fee, such as Cognito Recall and Stream.We are running at about 90,000 pounds per year. The solution is a licensed cost. The hardware that they gave us was pretty much next to nothing. It is the license that we're paying for.

More Vectra AI Pricing and Cost Advice »

TippingPoint is not as expensive as Palo Alto but it's not as cheap as Fortigate.

More Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software solutions are best for your needs.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 35% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
Vectra Networks, Vectra AI NDRTippingPoint, TippingPoint Intrusion Prevention System, Next-Generation Intrusion Prevention SystemWatchGuard IPS
Learn
Vectra AI
Trend Micro
WatchGuard
Overview

Vectra® is the leader in network detection and response – from cloud and data center workloads to user and IoT devices. Its Cognito® platform accelerates threat detection and investigation using artificial intelligence to collect, store and enrich network metadata with the right context to detect, hunt and investigate known and unknown threats in real time. Vectra offers three applications on the Cognito platform to address high-priority use cases. Cognito Stream™ sends security-enriched metadata to data lakes and SIEMs. Cognito Recall™ is a cloud-based application to store and investigate threats in enriched metadata. And Cognito Detect™ uses AI to reveal and prioritize hidden and unknown attackers at speed.

Using a combination of technologies such as deep packet inspection and threat reputation, the TippingPoint NGIPS provides organizations with a proactive approach to security. It gives you the high accuracy, comprehensive contextual awareness, in-depth analysis of network traffic, and the visibility and agility necessary to keep pace with today's evolving security landscape.

Online attacks and malware continue to evolve, using sophisticated methods to exploit victims. WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service (IPS) provides a preemptive approach to network security that adds an essential layer of threat detection and prevention. IPS protects your network from a wide range of malicious activities, including SQL injections, cross-site scripting, and buffer overflows.

Offer
Learn more about Vectra AI
Learn more about Trend Micro TippingPoint NGIPS
Learn more about WatchGuard Intrusion Prevention Service
Sample Customers
Tribune Media Group, Barry University, Aruba Networks, Good Technology, Riverbed, Santa Clara University, Securities Exchange, Tri-State Generation and Transmission AssociationYapi KrediChester School District
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Mining And Metals Company22%
Retailer22%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider24%
Government6%
K 12 Educational Company Or School4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider24%
K 12 Educational Company Or School7%
Media Company4%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise80%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business75%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise13%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about GFI, Vectra AI, Darktrace and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software. Updated: July 2020.
431,081 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software vendors.

We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.