We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Tricentis Flood vs. Tricentis NeoLoad

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis Flood vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

"Their technical support is awesome.""The most valuable feature is the support for Java, where we can quickly code what we need.""You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises. That is a very good part of the solution."

More Tricentis Flood Pros »

"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as it connects to all of the endpoints that we need it to.""The scripting is really user-friendly and the reporting is very good.""The licensing cost is very less for NeoLoad. It is user-friendly and easy to understand because they have created so many useful functionalities. When I started working with this tool, we just had to do the initial assessment about whether this tool will be able to support our daily work or not. I could easily understand it. I didn't have to search Google or watch YouTube videos. In just 15 to 20 minutes, I was able to understand the tool.""The stability is okay.""Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good.""The test cases are quite easy to build and to maintain. This is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us. It's the reason why they changed from JMeter to NeoLoad."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pros »

"The performance of the tool needs to improve.""We used an implementation strategy to deploy the solution, not because of the tools, but mainly because of the scripting part of the tool.""The solution is quite immature, it is not in an optimal state."

More Tricentis Flood Cons »

"LoadRunner supports multiple protocols, whereas NeoLoad supports only three protocols. With NeoLoad, we can go for the SAP technology, web-based HTTP, and Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP). If I have to simulate .NET application-based traffic, I won't be able to do that. So, protocol support is a limitation for NeoLoad. It should support more protocols.""Support wasn't able to solve a technical issue.""LoadRunner offers a full protocol, whereas, with this product, only a few of the protocols are supported - not all.""Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing.""I would like to see support for auto-correlations.""Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This solution is in the average price range compared to other testing tools.""The only positive point is it came free with my test automation tool."

More Tricentis Flood Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Its licensing cost is very less.""Licensing for NeoLoad is subscription-based."

More Tricentis NeoLoad Pricing and Cost Advice »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: You can utilize this tool on the cloud, and also access application on-premises. That is a very good part of the solution.
Top Answer: The positive point we were able to achieve the objective as per plan.
Top Answer: The solution is not in an optimal state. During POC, we analyzed tool is kept on upgrading. The patch deployment is happening in parallel, things that are working today are not working tomorrow. We… more »
Top Answer: I'm not exactly sure what the pricing is as it differs from client to client. That said, LoadRunner is expensive and NeoLoad is less expensive whereas JMeter is free.
Top Answer: There are still some glitches that they need to improve. We have given support feedback as well when we have some issues. They're very responsive and they do work to fix and improve issues. LoadRunner… more »
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Average Words per Review
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Average Words per Review
Also Known As
Flood IO
NeoLoad, Neotys NeoLoad
Learn More

Tricentis Flood is a cloud-based, distributed load testing platform that helps teams test, analyze and improve the way their applications scale - with seamless integration across the DevOps pipeline. With Tricentis Flood, you can achieve a continuous view of application performance and go live with confidence.

The NeoLoad load and performance testing tool for web and mobile apps realistically simulates user activity and monitors infrastructure behavior to eliminate bottlenecks. It covers all performance testing from component and automated tests to system-wide hybrid-cloud load tests.

Learn more about Tricentis Flood
Learn more about Tricentis NeoLoad
Sample Customers
Nike, heroku, Soulcycle, NEC, boston.com, Typeform, Xero, Telus
Dell, H&R Block, Best Buy, Orange, Verizon Wireless, ING, Mazda, Siemens, University of Oxford
Top Industries
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider14%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Computer Software Company18%
Individual & Family Service12%
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
No Data Available
Small Business5%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise76%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis Flood vs. Tricentis NeoLoad and other solutions. Updated: November 2021.
552,407 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Tricentis Flood is ranked 11th in Load Testing Tools with 3 reviews while Tricentis NeoLoad is ranked 5th in Load Testing Tools with 6 reviews. Tricentis Flood is rated 7.0, while Tricentis NeoLoad is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Tricentis Flood writes "Awesome technical support, integrates well, and installation is easy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tricentis NeoLoad writes "Good licensing cost, user-friendly, and makes it easy and quick to create scripts". Tricentis Flood is most compared with BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud, Apache JMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, whereas Tricentis NeoLoad is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter, Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and RadView WebLOAD. See our Tricentis Flood vs. Tricentis NeoLoad report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.