Most Helpful Review
It can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign functionality.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Compared to other tools we have been looking at, you don't have to be a programmer to operate it, though it helps. It also a product that can be used by business people.
We are satisfied with the support of Tricentis.
We have multiple applications, and it supports parallel execution. It has mobile automation.
Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications.
Object Identification Wizard.
Image recognition: It has allowed us to automate a GUI section of our product which involves drawing different topologies.
Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface.
The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable.
We are now trying to automate all our applications: SAP, web, third-party, and legacy. Instead of multiple tools, we have been able to have Worksoft handle a lot of our applications. This has saved us a lot of time and effort.
People who don't have coding knowledge are capable of doing automation with Certify. It reduces coding and scripting dependencies.
Our business users are doing regression testing as their day job. This is an add-on to their daily work. With everything so pressured in the industry, automation takes the pressure of these users.
It helps us to implement automation testing as part of most projects, so the need for manual testing can be reduced. This really accelerates the testing process as a whole. Before, where it could take ten days to test a project, now it takes only one or two days to do the complete testing.
Worksoft has helped us position our company better because the product lets us show our value in terms of the benefits that we bring.
Mostly in the area of project testing, the most immediate benefit is when you historically have manual testers do a certain job, and a full regression testing was previously done 100 percent manually. We have had cases where the release testing for an entire region would take around 12 weeks. With Worksoft, we are now down to two to three weeks. So, that is one use case where we have had success.
It's very different versus other tools in the past, which were not very modern. It easy for people to automate.
It provides a lot of time savings. We are always ready to execute a task whenever the business asks us. We saved approximately 7000 hours in 2018.
Setup wasn't that straightforward; it was more complex. It all depends on the environment, because there were a lot of errors on our applications. Therefore, it wasn't an easy setup for us.
It needs better integration with JIRA.
I would like a better user interface.
Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability.
The reporting function was lacking in usability and detail.
Security, UI, and basic performance improvements could be done to the product to enhance its use.
Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution.
Might have a learning curve, as it does not follow the traditional Record-Play functionality, but tests have to be built from requirements or Agile story cards.
Technical support's first response to us is usually late.
Web UI testing was difficult in the beginning, as we had a homegrown product, and we had to do the proper object naming.
One feature that could be added to Capture 2.0 is generating a PDF file from your capture, so you can see your screenshots and steps.
The updates for SAP Fiori have been great, where previously we saw a lot of issues. A year ago, it used to fail miserably.
There have been some previous security concerns with the way that Capture has worked. When you turn it on, you don't know what it's capturing. This has raised some concerns in the past, especially in our European regions.
The stability needs help. This is main thing that needs help, and if it's not the stability, then it's Worksoft's ability to respond to issues.
The technical support comes on, and says, "Oh, so-and-so link is here, go through that link, and make the modifications." I'm not comfortable in making those changes. I want to schedule a call, share my screen, and have them fix it for me.
With one of our applications where we do check-in, Worksoft is not able to identify the Java-based application. We raised the ticket, but we were unable to resolve this using Worksoft.
Pricing and Cost Advice
We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution.
The pricing is high, but altogether it offers you the ability to automate all sorts of applications: desktop, web, mobile, etc.
Expensive, but for long-term projects, it is paying back.
It is an expensive tool compared to other test automation tools. It has a lot of advantages over other tools.
We no longer need ten people sitting and manually testing something. We can just have one person running the entire regression automation testing suite, and this has saved us dollars.
The license cost is quite high. This might not be a consideration for a large company, but it will be for a small company. E.g., Tricentis (their competitor) offers certain exclusive use cases where a company can use it in a certain way, so this is another option that companies consider.
Automating our manual processes has saved us 70 to 80 percent in time.
We saved $1.3 million using Worksoft Certify in 2017.
Cost-wise, compared with other tools, it is a great product.
This solution has enabled our clients to automate and save time (approximately 40 to 50 percent).
We've saved over 80 percent in time savings.
It saves us time: approximately 50 percent.
out of 48 in Functional Testing Tools
Average Words per Review
out of 48 in Functional Testing Tools
Average Words per Review
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Tricentis Tosca specializes in enabling large enterprises to improve the quality of their applications by equipping them to optimize, manage, and automate their software testing.
Tosca's model-based approach to software test automation enables enterprises to achieve high automation rates while maximizing business risk coverage.
Tricentis Tosca also provides market-leading test case design and planning capabilities, test data provisioning, service virtualization, mobile testing, and more.
Tosca is fully compatible with other testing solutions and Application Lifecycle Management products. Tricentis also offers uniquely designed testing solutions for SAP, ServiceNow, Trax, Avaloq, and Oracle.
|Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.|
Learn more about Tricentis Tosca
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
|HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone||Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines|
Financial Services Firm29%
Financial Services Firm21%
Comms Service Provider14%
Software R&D Company26%
Financial Services Firm12%