We performed a comparison between Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Tufin Orchestration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It scans our containers in real time. Also, as they're built, it's looking into the container repository where the images are built, telling us ahead of time, "You have vulnerabilities here, and you should update this code before you deploy." And once it's deployed, it's scanning for vulnerabilities that are in production as the container is running."
"CSPM is very useful because it gives us good policies and violation alerts."
"The support is excellent."
"The runtime mechanism on the solution is very useful. It's got very good network mapping between containers. If you have more than one container, you can create a content data link between them."
"I like Prisma's ability to integrate with other tools. We can integrate it with Jira so that when Prisma triggers an alert, it opens a ticket in Jira. That was a big selling point for the product. There's a feature called the guest custom template that allows you to trigger alerts in Jira based on the template. That can also be added as a feature on Jira."
"The solution gives us a lot of visibility across all of our cloud solutions."
"CSPM is the most valuable feature for any organization that runs its workloads in the cloud."
"Integration is very easy. And because it supports security that spans multi- and hybrid-cloud environments, it's very easy to use."
"We've scaled it to hundreds of firewalls."
"The product streamlines our change management process."
"Tufin assists us in maintaining a robust view of our internal network topology."
"We use Tufin to clean up our firewall policies because it is so fast. A report about compliance and the clean-up process used to take about one month up before. With Tufin, it takes only one day."
"The most valuable feature are role and objects usage for individual objects and app usage."
"Being able to customize your own clarity to that aspect of change management."
"It allows administrators to visualize the traffic flow, and troubleshoot when necessary."
"The most valuable feature of Tufin is rule analysis."
"The licensing is a bit confusing."
"Prisma Cloud supports generating CSV files, but I would also like it to generate PDF files for reporting."
"The visibility on the SIEM needs to be streamlined so we can get the data without any issues."
"We would like it to have more features from the risk and compliance perspectives."
"The user interface should be improved and made easier."
"They are missing some compatibility details in their documentation."
"We had some teething issues with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, but overall, it did what we expected."
"We identified two things that we felt would be great to have, but they are under NDA. So, I can't disclose them. Other than those two things, we identified a generic bug in the secret key management service on AWS that needs to be fixed. We reported it to them, and we want them to fix it."
"I would really like to see a new UI for SecureChange. SecureTrack 2.0 has quite an improvement in the UI and it flows more smoothly. The current SecureTrack and SecureChange are a little blocky, and sometimes loading a tab or a page is required to refresh information. Whereas in SecureTrack 2.0, they're starting to improve on that."
"They are a little bit behind on some of their support for the Palo Alto firewall platform. I'd like to see that catch up, specifically around importing certain objects."
"I would like to see the setup of the Unified Security Policy simplified."
"The solution does not have automation with other Firewalls."
"The policy browser has had trouble working. We have experienced bugs."
"The interface is like a 1990s kind of thing. It's a little ugly. There are many things that you cannot tweak, little things like the column width and how you display the information. You end up exporting everything to an Excel file and doing your work there."
"I would like to see visibility into the FW features like IPS/Content Filter policies, the same way it does for FW rules/policies."
"The pricing of the solution is rather expensive."
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 81 reviews while Tufin Orchestration Suite is ranked 20th in Container Security with 180 reviews. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while Tufin Orchestration Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "The dashboard is very user-friendly and can be used to generate custom RQL based on user requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tufin Orchestration Suite writes "A flexible, very secure solution that works well in Layer 2 environments". Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, AWS Security Hub and CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security, whereas Tufin Orchestration Suite is most compared with AlgoSec, FireMon Security Manager, Skybox Security Suite, Palo Alto Networks Panorama and RedSeal. See our Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
