Compare UFT (QTP) vs. UFT Pro (LeanFT)

UFT Pro (LeanFT) is ranked 15th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews while UFT (QTP) is ranked 2nd in Functional Testing Tools with 6 reviews. UFT Pro (LeanFT) is rated 6.8, while UFT (QTP) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of UFT Pro (LeanFT) writes "Helps to determine problem areas but it has many problems and limitations ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". UFT Pro (LeanFT) is most compared with UFT (QTP), Selenium HQ and Tricentis Tosca, whereas UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and UFT Pro (LeanFT). See our UFT (QTP) vs. UFT Pro (LeanFT) report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
UFT Pro (LeanFT) Logo
6,158 views|3,698 comparisons
UFT (QTP) Logo
25,519 views|15,615 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about UFT (QTP) vs. UFT Pro (LeanFT) and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The most valuable feature of the solution is the number of plugins for object recognition. The predefined libraries allow us to automate tasks.The most valuable feature for me is the number of protocols that can be tested. It not only tests Web, but also SAP, Siebel, .Net, and even pdf.One of the important features, which speeds up the automation testing development with LeanFT, is its object repository functions. Object identification are the most time-consuming aspect of building automation tests. LeanFT gives that out of the box. It helps you identify the objects and after that, once you got the object in place, then it's just about building the test scripts. So it reduces your development time significantly.It is a product that can meet regulations of the banking industry.It's a complete pursuit and it's a logical pursuit working with HPE.

Read more »

We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.​Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users.Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test.With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources.

Read more »

Cons
UFT is like a flagship of testing tools, but it's too expensive and people are not using it so much. They should work on their pricing to make themselves more competitive.It's now too heavy and they should be making it faster. We do an attempt at automatic regression testing. We schedule a test to start at a certain time. It takes a lot of time to download the resources and start UFT. Competitors in this area have tools that start faster and run the test faster. For example, if the test at our side will take 10 minutes, another tool will do that in one minute.The parallel execution of the tests needs improvement. When we are running tests in LeanFT, there are some limitations in terms of running the same tests simultaneously across different browsers. If I'm running a test, let's say to log in, I should be able to execute it through IE, through Microsoft Edge, through Chrome, through Mozilla, etc. This capability doesn't exist in LeanFT. Parallel execution of the test cases across different browsers need to be added.It is unstable, expensive, inflexible, and has poor support.We push one button and the tests are completely executed at once, so just have to analyze and say it's okay. It would be nice if this could be entirely automated.

Read more »

Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation).I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications.Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It is quite expensive and is priced per seat or in concurrent (or floating) licenses over a period of months.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
372,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
15th
Views
6,158
Comparisons
3,698
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
951
Avg. Rating
6.5
2nd
Views
25,519
Comparisons
15,615
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
1,042
Avg. Rating
8.9
Top Comparisons
Compared 44% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFTMicro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Micro Focus
Micro Focus
Overview

Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is a powerful yet lightweight functional test automation solution, that supports a wide range of AUT technologies. Targeted to technical test automation engineers and developers/testers in Agile teams, Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is fully embedded in standard IDEs and integrates naturally with the Dev and QA ecosystems.

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Offer
Learn more about UFT Pro (LeanFT)
Learn More About UFT

Fill out the form to view the report

Sample Customers
Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm23%
Healthcare Company15%
Comms Service Provider15%
Insurance Company15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company29%
Comms Service Provider19%
Healthcare Company10%
Individual & Family Service9%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Healthcare Company14%
Retailer14%
Insurance Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise80%
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise84%
Find out what your peers are saying about UFT (QTP) vs. UFT Pro (LeanFT) and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email