Compare UFT (QTP) vs. Worksoft Certify

UFT (QTP) is ranked 2nd in Functional Testing Tools with 6 reviews while Worksoft Certify is ranked 1st in Functional Testing Tools with 30 reviews. UFT (QTP) is rated 9.0, while Worksoft Certify is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of UFT (QTP) writes "With regularly occurring application releases, any QA team member can execute tests (regression suites) stored in ALM/Quality Center, let the tests run unattended, and then examine the results". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Worksoft Certify writes "Our automation tests are more robust than our manual tests". UFT (QTP) is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and UFT Pro (LeanFT), whereas Worksoft Certify is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, UFT (QTP) and Selenium HQ. See our UFT (QTP) vs. Worksoft Certify report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
UFT (QTP) Logo
25,519 views|15,615 comparisons
Worksoft Certify Logo
10,738 views|3,266 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about UFT (QTP) vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution.​Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users.Object Repository Technology, which is a good mean to identify graphical components of the applications under test.With frequent releases, using automation to perform regression testing can save us huge amount of time and resources.

Read more »

With autotesting, we have been able to eliminate duplication of test cases across those four areas. This has helped us knock down our number of test cases. Our test cases are also running more optimally. Therefore, it has very much helped in that sense, so we were able to eliminate a lot of test cases and get out of manual silos by running on autotesting, which is more efficient.It is a pretty easy tool to use as far as automated testing tools go.We are now trying to automate all our applications: SAP, web, third-party, and legacy. Instead of multiple tools, we have been able to have Worksoft handle a lot of our applications. This has saved us a lot of time and effort.People who don't have coding knowledge are capable of doing automation with Certify. It reduces coding and scripting dependencies.Our business users are doing regression testing as their day job. This is an add-on to their daily work. With everything so pressured in the industry, automation takes the pressure of these users.It helps us to implement automation testing as part of most projects, so the need for manual testing can be reduced. This really accelerates the testing process as a whole. Before, where it could take ten days to test a project, now it takes only one or two days to do the complete testing.Worksoft has helped us position our company better because the product lets us show our value in terms of the benefits that we bring.Mostly in the area of project testing, the most immediate benefit is when you historically have manual testers do a certain job, and a full regression testing was previously done 100 percent manually. We have had cases where the release testing for an entire region would take around 12 weeks. With Worksoft, we are now down to two to three weeks. So, that is one use case where we have had success.

Read more »

Cons
Needs to improve the integration with the CI/CD pipeline (VSTS and report generation).I would like to have detailed description provided to test the cloud-based applications.Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers.

Read more »

It would be great if our business testers could develop their own automated test cases. With every release you do, you have to go back and touch your old test cases and bring them up to speed, or develop new test cases. In the beginning, that is a challenge because you have to have someone who is certified in the tool to help you develop these test cases.Technical support's first response to us is usually late.Web UI testing was difficult in the beginning, as we had a homegrown product, and we had to do the proper object naming.One feature that could be added to Capture 2.0 is generating a PDF file from your capture, so you can see your screenshots and steps.The updates for SAP Fiori have been great, where previously we saw a lot of issues. A year ago, it used to fail miserably.There have been some previous security concerns with the way that Capture has worked. When you turn it on, you don't know what it's capturing. This has raised some concerns in the past, especially in our European regions.The stability needs help. This is main thing that needs help, and if it's not the stability, then it's Worksoft's ability to respond to issues.The technical support comes on, and says, "Oh, so-and-so link is here, go through that link, and make the modifications." I'm not comfortable in making those changes. I want to schedule a call, share my screen, and have them fix it for me.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
There is a cost involved to doing it, but once you get over the initial cost, then you'll start reaping the benefits and seeing that testing is getting done more quickly and efficiently. We are still early on with it, but the expectation and what we're seeing is that we will start seeing some savings coming out on the back-end once we have this done.The price is in line with everyone else's in the market. They are not cheaper nor more expensive than anyone else who was in our RFP.We no longer need ten people sitting and manually testing something. We can just have one person running the entire regression automation testing suite, and this has saved us dollars.The license cost is quite high. This might not be a consideration for a large company, but it will be for a small company. E.g., Tricentis (their competitor) offers certain exclusive use cases where a company can use it in a certain way, so this is another option that companies consider.Automating our manual processes has saved us 70 to 80 percent in time.We saved $1.3 million using Worksoft Certify in 2017.Cost-wise, compared with other tools, it is a great product.This solution has enabled our clients to automate and save time (approximately 40 to 50 percent).

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
Views
25,519
Comparisons
15,615
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
1,042
Avg. Rating
8.9
1st
Views
10,738
Comparisons
3,266
Reviews
30
Average Words per Review
1,253
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Also Known As
Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro, QuickTest Professional, HPE UFT (QTP)
Learn
Micro Focus
Worksoft
Overview

QuickTest Professional is now known as Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing, and is an automated testing tool that provides unified AI, GUI, and Business Process testing.

With QuickTest Professional, you can free up IT resources to focus on other areas, while the automated software takes care of all your application software testing requirements. Testing happens continuously and quickly, and so nips any potential issues in the bud. QuickTest Professional saves money and time, and optimizes business productivity and overall user experience.

Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.
Offer
Learn More About UFT

Fill out the form to view the report

Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Sample Customers
CSS Insurance, Revolution IT, Credit Suisse, and General Electric Company.Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm36%
Insurance Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
Retailer14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company34%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company26%
Energy/Utilities Company16%
Consumer Goods13%
Logistics Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Manufacturing Company13%
Media Company10%
Pharma/Biotech Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise84%
REVIEWERS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise91%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business4%
Midsize Enterprise1%
Large Enterprise95%
Find out what your peers are saying about UFT (QTP) vs. Worksoft Certify and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,906 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email