Compare Umantis vs. Work.com

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Umantis Logo
122 views|83 comparisons
Work.com Logo
110 views|86 comparisons
Ranking
28th
out of 53 in Talent Management
Views
122
Comparisons
83
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
29th
out of 53 in Talent Management
Views
110
Comparisons
86
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management. Updated: July 2021.
523,372 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Umantis
Video Not Available
Overview

The Haufe Talent Management Solution allows you and your organization to concentrate on the most important goals, by enabling smooth cooperation between HR, management and employees to sharpen the focus on effective collaboration.

Today_s workplace requires a new approach to performance management. Rypple is a web-based social performance management platform that helps companies improve performance through social goals, continuous feedback and meaningful recognition.
Offer
Learn more about Umantis
Learn more about Work.com
Sample Customers
PricewaterhouseCoopers, Tesa, Bayer, Ergo, Geberit, HDI-Gerling Insurance, Carglass, Migros, Manor, OMV, Ricola, Olympus Corporation
Varsity Spirit
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Workday, Oracle and others in Talent Management. Updated: July 2021.
523,372 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Umantis is ranked 28th in Talent Management while Work.com is ranked 29th in Talent Management. Umantis is rated 0.0, while Work.com is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Umantis is most compared with , whereas Work.com is most compared with Workday.

See our list of best Talent Management vendors.

We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.