Uniface vs Windows Server AppFabric comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Uniface Logo
184 views|143 comparisons
Microsoft Logo
293 views|182 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Uniface and Windows Server AppFabric based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
ArturOrdyan
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It is expensive, and its licensing is a bit confusing."
  • "The product is affordable, in my opinion."
  • More Windows Server AppFabric Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The product's deployment phase was very easy.
    Top Answer:The product is unable to connect with different cloud services. The product should be able to connect with different cloud services. The aforementioned improvement in the product can make the… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    184
    Comparisons
    143
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    293
    Comparisons
    182
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    384
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Compuware Uniface
    Learn More
    Overview

    Uniface’s model-driven, low-code methodology empowers developers to focus on high-value tasks like user experience and business logic integration, rather than basic coding. The result? New applications make it to market or into internal use faster and with less work than ever, removing barriers to innovation, creating fresh revenue streams and thrilling end users.

    Windows Server AppFabric extends Windows Server to provide enhanced hosting, management, and caching capabilities for Web applications and middle-tier services. The AppFabric hosting features add service management extensions to Internet Information Services (IIS), Windows Process Activation Service (WAS), and the .NET Framework 4. This includes Hosting Services and Hosting Administration tools that make it easier to deploy, configure, and manage Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) and Windows Workflow Foundation (WF) based services. The AppFabric caching features add a distributed, in-memory object cache to Windows Server that makes it easier to scale out high-performance .NET applications, especially ASP.NET applications.
    Sample Customers
    BMW, Boeing, Ford, Telmex, NTT Data, Kawasaki, Takt, FCS, MidlandHR, Dixons Carphone, DHL, Land Rover, 7Eleven
    OSIsoft
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Uniface is ranked 24th in Application Infrastructure while Windows Server AppFabric is ranked 18th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews. Uniface is rated 0.0, while Windows Server AppFabric is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Server AppFabric writes "Offers good monitoring capabilities and ease of setup". Uniface is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework, whereas Windows Server AppFabric is most compared with IIS.

    See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

    We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.