Compare Veracode vs. WhiteSource

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
67,668 views|36,295 comparisons
WhiteSource Logo
12,749 views|9,395 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode vs. WhiteSource and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,043 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The usability and overall scan results are good.""Picks up weaknesses in our app setups.""The scalability is good. The scalability is more than good because it can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated as part of applications. So that really makes it a very, very versatile solution to have.""For us, the most valuable aspect of the solution is the log-sequence feature.""It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have.""Our developers can run the attacks directly from their environments, desktops.""The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution.""The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment."

More Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner Pros »

"The reporting being highly accurate is pretty cool. I use another product and I was always looking for answers as to what line, which part of the code, was wrong, and what to do about it. Veracode seems to have a solid database to look things up and a website to look things up.""Veracode's cloud-based approach, coupled with the appliance that lets us use Veracode to scan internal-only web applications, has provided a seamless, always-up-to-date application security scanning solution.""The source composition analysis component is great because it gives our developers some comfort in using new libraries.""Integrations into our developer's IDE (Greenlight) and the DevOps Pipeline SAST / SourceClear Integrations has particularly increased our time to market and confidence.""Veracode is a valuable tool in our secure SDLC process.""We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes.""I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code.""The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs."

More Veracode Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the unified JAR to scan for all langs (wss-scanner jar).""Our dev team uses the fix suggestions feature to quickly find the best path for remediation.""The reporting capability gives us the option to generate an open-source license report in a single click, which gets all copyright and license information, including dependencies.""With the fix suggestions feature, not only do you get the specific trace back to where the vulnerability is within your code, but you also get fix suggestions.""It gives us full visibility into what we're using, what needs to be updated, and what's vulnerable, which helps us make better decisions.""For us, the most valuable tool was open-source licensing analysis.""The most valuable features are the reporting, customizing libraries "In-house, White list, license selection", comparing the products/projects, and License & Copyright resolution.""Attribution and license due diligence reports help us with aggregating the necessary data that we, in turn, have to provide to satisfy the various licenses copyright and component usage disclosures in our software."

More WhiteSource Pros »

Cons
"There is room for improvement in website authentication because I've seen other products that can do it much better.""Currently only supports web scanning.""We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and throttling of the traffic.""The solution limits the number of scans. It would be much better if we could have unlimited scans.""When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic.""Tools that would allow us to work more efficiently with the mobile environment, with Android and iOS.""In terms of what needs improvement, the way the licensing model is currently is not very convenient for us because initially, when we bought it, the licensing model was very flexible, but now it restricts us.""It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched."

More Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner Cons »

"The triage indicator was kind of hard to find. It's a very small arrow and I had no idea it was there.""One feature I would like would be more selectivity in email alerts. While I like getting these, I would like to be able to be more granular in which ones I receive.""I think for us the biggest improvement would be to have an indicator when there's something wrong with a scan.""Improve Mobile Application Dynamic Scanning DAST - .ipa and .apk""It needs better controls to include/exclude specific sections when creating a report that can be shared externally with customers and prospects.""One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications.""Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them.""I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages."

More Veracode Cons »

"The dashboard UI and UX are problematic.""The UI can be slow once in a while, and we're not sure if it's because of the amount of data we have, or it is just a slow product, but it would be nice if it could be improved.""It would be nice to have a better way to realize its full potential and translate it within the UI or during onboarding.""The UI is not that friendly and you need to learn how to navigate easily.""WhiteSource Prioritize should be expanded to cover more than Java and JavaScript.""If anything, I would spend more time making this more user-friendly, better documenting the CLI, and adding more examples to help expand the current documentation.""WhiteSource needs improvement in the scanning of the containers and images with distinguishing the layers.""Some detected libraries do not specify a location of where in the source they were matched from, which is something that should be enhanced to enable quicker troubleshooting."

More WhiteSource Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced.""The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000.""All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio.""The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable.""When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted.""Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special."

More Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.""No issues, the pricing seems reasonable."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Pricing is competitive.""The version that we are using, WhiteSource Bolt, is a free integration with Azure DevOps."

More WhiteSource Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
438,043 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The scalability is good. The scalability is more than good because it can operate both as a standalone and it can be… more »
Top Answer: We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and… more »
Top Answer: JaeLee, check out our comparison page here of Veracode vs Checkmarx… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend Veracode. Our uses cases included removing vulnerable code from our Product and ensuring the product… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the unified JAR to scan for all langs (wss-scanner jar).
Top Answer: The dashboard UI and UX are problematic. This solution looks like a 1995 web site and it's very hard to understand what… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 51% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
AcuSensor
Learn
Acunetix
Veracode
WhiteSource
Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

The leading solution for agile open source security and license compliance management, WhiteSource integrates with the DevOps pipeline to detect vulnerable open source libraries in real-time.

It provides remediation paths and policy automation to speed up time-to-fix. It also prioritizes vulnerability alerts based on usage analysis.

We support over 200 programming languages and offer the widest vulnerability database aggregating information from dozens of peer-reviewed, respected sources.

Offer
Learn more about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about WhiteSource
Sample Customers
Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New ZealandState of Missouri, ReknerMicrosoft, Autodesk, NCR, Comcast, Nokia, Forgerock, indeed.com, GE digital, KPMG, LivePerson, Jack Henry and Associates
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm40%
Comms Service Provider10%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Insurance Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company6%
Government6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm37%
Insurance Company13%
Consumer Goods Company7%
Healthcare Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company6%
Insurance Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company6%
Manufacturing Company3%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business28%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise67%
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise54%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
REVIEWERS
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise40%
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode vs. WhiteSource and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,043 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Veracode is ranked 2nd in Application Security with 14 reviews while WhiteSource is ranked 8th in Application Security with 9 reviews. Veracode is rated 8.4, while WhiteSource is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Veracode writes "Offers everything for both static code analysis and dynamic code analysis". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WhiteSource writes "Policy automation and automatic fix suggestions help us to save time in finding and solving problems". Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, Klocwork and WebInspect, whereas WhiteSource is most compared with Black Duck , SonarQube, Snyk, Sonatype Nexus Lifecycle and Checkmarx. See our Veracode vs. WhiteSource report.

See our list of best Application Security vendors.

We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.