We performed a comparison between Veritas InfoScale Availability and Windows Server Failover Clustering based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, Veritas and others in High Availability Clustering."It integrates well with other solutions."
"The reliability is pretty good."
"The product is stable."
"The most valuable features of Windows Server Failover Clustering are the ISS, failover cluster, and DC."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily create clusters supporting geo-redundancy."
"Some of the advantages, are it can give you the ability to choose."
"The solution switches over to another server in case the server goes down."
"It could be more stable and more secure."
"They could drop the price or improve the cost of the hyper-converged component of it all. Right now, licensing is expensive and complex."
"The tool's pricing is high."
"The stability is good, except for when something crashes or shuts down unexpectedly, then it can be a bit difficult to reestablish the service in a stable state."
"The product should be less dependent on network configuration."
"There are times when we do the system security updates and have to restart the server which is difficult because we need to wait until the end of the day or when working hours are finished. There are service updates that have a requirement to restart the system and it is not convenient."
"The standard, non-enterprise technical support could be improved."
More Veritas InfoScale Availability Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Windows Server Failover Clustering Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Veritas InfoScale Availability is ranked 3rd in High Availability Clustering while Windows Server Failover Clustering is ranked 1st in High Availability Clustering with 8 reviews. Veritas InfoScale Availability is rated 8.0, while Windows Server Failover Clustering is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Veritas InfoScale Availability writes "It provides a stable SAP environment, but deployment does require someone with experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Windows Server Failover Clustering writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that is affordable and easy to deploy". Veritas InfoScale Availability is most compared with HPE Serviceguard, IBM PowerHA System Mirror and DRBD, whereas Windows Server Failover Clustering is most compared with IBM PowerHA System Mirror, DRBD and HPE Serviceguard.
See our list of best High Availability Clustering vendors.
We monitor all High Availability Clustering reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
