Compare Verodin vs. XM Cyber HaXM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Verodin Logo
2,067 views|1,388 comparisons
XM Cyber HaXM Logo
843 views|573 comparisons
Top Review
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) solutions are best for your needs.
535,015 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is constantly updating. Their data and security validation are cutting-edge.
Top Answer: I wasn't involved at the very end when it came to the discussion of pricing. At the time of the pricing of the solution, it's my understanding that the pricing model that they had for this solution… more »
Top Answer: The integration engine needs to improve. We try to integrate it with other tools, especially with Splunk or with the MyDLP engine, and even with Microsoft Exchange. As much as they tried to make it… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
2,067
Comparisons
1,388
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,204
Rating
7.0
Views
843
Comparisons
573
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.

HaXM by XM Cyber is the first breach and attack simulation (BAS) platform to simulate, validate and remediate attackers’ paths to your critical assets 24×7. HaXM’s automated purple teaming aligns red and blue teams to provide the full realistic APT experience on one hand while delivering vital prioritized remediation on the other. Addressing real user behavior and exploits, the full spectrum of scenarios is aligned to your organization’s own network to expose blind spots and is executed using the most up-to-date attack techniques safely, without affecting network availability and user experience.

Offer
Learn more about Verodin
Learn more about XM Cyber HaXM
Sample Customers
AAFCU, Amuse, Axway, Bank Gutmann, Bank of Thailand, BCC Corporation, Blackboat, CapWealth Advisors, CBC, CERN, Lagardère, Land Bank of the Philippines, laya healthcare, Lindsay Automotive Group
Ovum, Plymouth Rock Corporation
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider28%
Financial Services Firm7%
Media Company5%

Verodin is ranked 1st in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review while XM Cyber HaXM is ranked 6th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Verodin is rated 7.0, while XM Cyber HaXM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". On the other hand, Verodin is most compared with AttackIQ, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Picus Security and Pentera, whereas XM Cyber HaXM is most compared with Cymulate, Pentera, AttackIQ, SafeBreach and Picus Security.

See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.

We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.