Anonymous UserCyber Security Consultant at a tech consulting company
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Earn 20 points
Equipped with FireEye frontline intelligence, the Verodin platform will measure and test security environments against both known and newly discovered threats, empowering organizations to identify risks in their security controls before a breach occurs, and rapidly adapt their defenses to the evolving threat landscape.
HaXM by XM Cyber is the first breach and attack simulation (BAS) platform to simulate, validate and remediate attackers’ paths to your critical assets 24×7. HaXM’s automated purple teaming aligns red and blue teams to provide the full realistic APT experience on one hand while delivering vital prioritized remediation on the other. Addressing real user behavior and exploits, the full spectrum of scenarios is aligned to your organization’s own network to expose blind spots and is executed using the most up-to-date attack techniques safely, without affecting network availability and user experience.
Verodin is ranked 1st in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 1 review while XM Cyber HaXM is ranked 6th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS). Verodin is rated 7.0, while XM Cyber HaXM is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Verodin writes "Stable with good updates but needs a better integration engine". On the other hand, Verodin is most compared with AttackIQ, Cymulate, SafeBreach, Picus Security and Pentera, whereas XM Cyber HaXM is most compared with Cymulate, Pentera, AttackIQ, SafeBreach and Picus Security.
See our list of best Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) vendors.
We monitor all Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.