We performed a comparison between TruView and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"Zabbix is quite stable once it is set up. We haven't had any post-setup issues."
"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."
"The overall functionality of Zabbix is very good. The monitoring of bank applications that Zabbix provides is great. The information is displayed on a dashboard that is easily viewed."
"We like the user-interface for this solution, which makes it an easy to use tool."
"The initial setup, while not simple, is easier than other products."
"The most valuable features of Zabbix are flexibility and a single interface for different types of monitoring."
"Dashboard and the customization of the items and triggers are the most valuable features."
"I have found that the reporting feature in Zabbix is most valuable. Additionally, the solution has given us bandwidth options, we are able to see where problems are. For example, we noticed a problem that occurred because of a bad interface going in the wireless VLAN."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
"Outside of the normal standard monitoring, I would like to extend patching, importing patching, and supporting patching for Windows Servers."
"I want Zabbix to improve the UX/UI. Zabbix doesn't use a JavaScript chart for images, and I want them to improve this."
"If you want to use all of the features then you have to pay a licensing fee."
"We would like to see the addition of automatic push functionality to this product. This would save time when monitoring our servers and networks as, at present, we have to manually install the Zabbix agent on any hardware to be monitored."
"I would like for this solution to be more cloud-friendly."
"The user interface could be better."
"It should be easy to modify the front end."
"The dashboard and the graph section could be a little bit more professional."
TruView is ranked 54th in Network Monitoring Software with 16 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 98 reviews. TruView is rated 9.6, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of TruView writes "We lacked visibility into network and app performance, so we chose Visual TruView to proactively manage our network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, SolarWinds NPM, Nagios XI and Nagios Core.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.