Compare WS_FTP Server vs. webMethods ActiveTransfer

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
33rd
Views
28
Comparisons
23
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
22nd
Views
188
Comparisons
147
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: October 2020.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 73% of the time.
Learn
Software AG
Progress Software
Overview

WHY ACTIVETRANSFER FOR MFT?
Imagine the simplicity of having a centralized console to easily manage partner files throughout your organization. That’s what you can do with webMethods ActiveTransfer for Managed File Transfer (MFT).

Using this secure, reliable, centrally managed file transfer system, you can:

-Exchange and schedule files of any size—even big data files—up to 25 times faster
-Centrally manage file transfers, set up transfer schedules and configure users
-Move large files quickly over long distances to increase partner response time
-Securely exchange files with partners using the latest security and encryption techniques
-Accelerate large file transfers by boosting performance 10 to 25 times, overcoming network
latency and boosting productivity
-Control transfer speeds and allocate necessary, network bandwidth to partners
-Ensure acceptance of file transfers from approved IP addresses and assigned users
-Schedule and create event-driven transfers
-Trigger file transfers as the events occurs, such as completion of a batch job

WS_FTP Server is a proven, effective, easy-to-use file transfer solution. Secure data in transit while integrating programmable methodologies that simplify file transfer tasks and improve efficiency. Improve control, visibility and security over file transfer activities by implementing safeguards against information leaks and data breaches.

Offer
Learn more about webMethods ActiveTransfer
Learn more about WS_FTP Server
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
BraunAbility, H&M Software, Killeen School, Positive Images UK, Scientific American, Sciforma, The Denver Broncos
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: October 2020.
446,626 professionals have used our research since 2012.
webMethods ActiveTransfer is ranked 33rd in Managed File Transfer while WS_FTP Server is ranked 22nd in Managed File Transfer. webMethods ActiveTransfer is rated 0.0, while WS_FTP Server is rated 0.0. On the other hand, webMethods ActiveTransfer is most compared with , whereas WS_FTP Server is most compared with MOVEit and Globalscape GlobalSCAPE Managed File Transfer.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.