Ranking | |
Views 36 Comparisons 30 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 0 Comparisons 0 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Find out what your peers are saying about Seeburger, Advanced Systems Concepts, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer. Updated: January 2021. 456,966 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Popular Comparisons | |
Learn | |
Software AG | OpenText |
Overview | |
WHY ACTIVETRANSFER FOR MFT?
Using this secure, reliable, centrally managed file transfer system, you can: -Exchange and schedule files of any size—even big data files—up to 25 times faster
| Discover OpenText XM SendSecure™, the enterprise-grade secure file exchange solution that balances defense-in-depth security with uncomplicated simplicity. Keep your data safe while facilitating compliance with HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, FERPA, SOX and more with an easy-to-use cloud-based solution. |
Offer | |
Learn more about webMethods ActiveTransfer | Learn more about XM SendSecure |
Sample Customers | |
Information Not Available | OCHIN, Pacific Life Insurance Company, Neptune Energy, Department for International Development, British American Tobacco, ZOLL Medical, Matson Logistics |
webMethods ActiveTransfer is ranked 33rd in Managed File Transfer while XM SendSecure is ranked 42nd in Managed File Transfer. webMethods ActiveTransfer is rated 0.0, while XM SendSecure is rated 0.0. On the other hand, webMethods ActiveTransfer is most compared with , whereas XM SendSecure is most compared with .
See our list of best Managed File Transfer vendors.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.