• Home
  • webMethods ActiveTransfer vs. XM SendSecure [EOL]

XM SendSecure [EOL] vs webMethods ActiveTransfer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between webMethods ActiveTransfer and XM SendSecure [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Michele Illiano
Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols
Use XM SendSecure [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

    • More webMethods ActiveTransfer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about webMethods ActiveTransfer?
    Top Answer:The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for webMethods Active...
    Top Answer:The licensing depends on the type of customer, so I would refrain from talking about it in an absolute kind of way. Overall, it's somewhat expensive, and depending on customer requirements, there are… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with webMethods ActiveTransfer?
    Top Answer:I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    17th
    out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Views
    318
    Comparisons
    115
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,311
    Rating
    8.0
    Unranked
    In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Software AG
    OpenText
    Overview

    WHY ACTIVETRANSFER FOR MFT?
    Imagine the simplicity of having a centralized console to easily manage partner files throughout your organization. That’s what you can do with webMethods ActiveTransfer for Managed File Transfer (MFT).

    Using this secure, reliable, centrally managed file transfer system, you can:

    -Exchange and schedule files of any size—even big data files—up to 25 times faster
    -Centrally manage file transfers, set up transfer schedules and configure users
    -Move large files quickly over long distances to increase partner response time
    -Securely exchange files with partners using the latest security and encryption techniques
    -Accelerate large file transfers by boosting performance 10 to 25 times, overcoming network
    latency and boosting productivity
    -Control transfer speeds and allocate necessary, network bandwidth to partners
    -Ensure acceptance of file transfers from approved IP addresses and assigned users
    -Schedule and create event-driven transfers
    -Trigger file transfers as the events occurs, such as completion of a batch job

    Discover OpenText XM SendSecure™, the enterprise-grade secure file exchange solution that balances defense-in-depth security with uncomplicated simplicity. Keep your data safe while facilitating compliance with HIPAA, PCI-DSS, GDPR, FERPA, SOX and more with an easy-to-use cloud-based solution.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    OCHIN, Pacific Life Insurance Company, Neptune Energy, Department for International Development, British American Tobacco, ZOLL Medical, Matson Logistics
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    webMethods ActiveTransfer is ranked 17th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 2 reviews while XM SendSecure [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT). webMethods ActiveTransfer is rated 8.0, while XM SendSecure [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of webMethods ActiveTransfer writes "It lets us maintain the file in the staging area before we transfer it". On the other hand, webMethods ActiveTransfer is most compared with Axway AMPLIFY Managed File Transfer, Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT and BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer, whereas XM SendSecure [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.