Compare WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs. webMethods Integration Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The tool is very powerful and user-friendly.The most valuable feature is stability.All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value.A product with good API and EDI components.We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting.It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine).

More webMethods Integration Server Pros »

The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations.The learning curve for this solution is very good.The stability is excellent.

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Pros »

Cons
I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration.Technical support is an area where they can improve.The price should be reduced to make it more affordable.The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly.We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics.t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData.

More webMethods Integration Server Cons »

The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it.I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version.There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced.

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced.The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing.The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product.It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one.Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers.

More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge.

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd
out of 25 in ESB
Views
16,887
Comparisons
11,622
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
417
Avg. Rating
8.0
9th
out of 25 in ESB
Views
4,771
Comparisons
3,682
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
320
Avg. Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Learn
Software AG
WSO2
Overview

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

Offer
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Learn more about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator
Sample Customers
Fujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirektWest
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company15%
Insurance Company15%
Manufacturing Company15%
Computer Software Company15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company45%
Comms Service Provider10%
Media Company7%
Retailer5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company51%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company6%
Insurance Company4%
Find out what your peers are saying about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
437,064 professionals have used our research since 2012.
webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in ESB with 7 reviews while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is ranked 9th in ESB with 3 reviews. webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0, while WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Integration Server and Universal messaging create an efficient development phase, enhance agility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator writes "Good integration between systems and strong stability". webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus and SAP Process Orchestration, whereas WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is most compared with Red Hat Fuse, Mule Anypoint Platform, IBM Integration Bus, Mule ESB and Boomi AtomSphere Integration. See our WSO2 Enterprise Integrator vs. webMethods Integration Server report.

See our list of best ESB vendors and best Data Integration Tools vendors.

We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.