We performed a comparison between webMethods Integration Server and WebRatio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."What I like best about webMethods Integration Server is its portfolio of connectors."
"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."
"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."
"The main assets are its flow language, debugging, and Broker. Flow language is far better and more flexible for debugging."
"I would say the core Web-based integrations work the best. They are the most efficient and robust implementations one can do with webMethods."
"We needed a tool that was able to orchestrate and help us configure our APIs so that we could maintain and see the heartbeat, traffic, trends, etc."
"I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well."
"The tool supports gRPC."
"The initial setup isn't too complex."
"The learning curve is a little steep at first."
"We'd like for them to open up to a more cloud-based solution that could offer more flexibility and maybe a better rules engine or more integration with rules engines."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"Support is expensive."
"Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large scale reimplementation for JMS."
"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."
"The maintenance aspect is too heavy."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews while WebRatio is ranked 56th in Business Process Management (BPM). webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0, while WebRatio is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebRatio writes "Little coding needed and speeds development time but lacks documentation". webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration, whereas WebRatio is most compared with .
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.