Compare White Ops FraudSensor vs. White Ops MediaGuard

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
8th
out of 14 in Bot Management
Views
287
Comparisons
115
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
11th
out of 14 in Bot Management
Views
98
Comparisons
71
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
FraudSensor
MediaGuard
Learn More
White Ops
Video Not Available
Overview

Today’s bots can imitate human behavior like never before. Fraudsensor puts bots under the microscope of deep scrutiny by directly investigating each individual transaction, giving your organization unparalleled visibility into bot activity across your digital advertising or web application. And with a simple JavaScript implementation, you can be up and running in an afternoon.

MediaGuard is fast. Ideal for a blocking or preventative use case, it combines the accuracy and resilience of FraudSensor with powerful machine learning to deliver precise bot decisions in milliseconds. With a simple API call you can now eliminate fraud at lightspeed, at scale and with confidence.

Offer
Learn more about White Ops FraudSensor
Learn more about White Ops MediaGuard
Sample Customers
theTradeDesk
Dealer.com

White Ops FraudSensor is ranked 8th in Bot Management while White Ops MediaGuard is ranked 11th in Bot Management. White Ops FraudSensor is rated 0.0, while White Ops MediaGuard is rated 0.0. On the other hand, White Ops FraudSensor is most compared with PerimeterX Bot Defender, whereas White Ops MediaGuard is most compared with Akamai Bot Manager.

See our list of best Bot Management vendors.

We monitor all Bot Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.