WSO2 Carbon [EOL] vs Windows Process Activation Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Windows Process Activation Services and WSO2 Carbon [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
232
Comparisons
180
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Application Infrastructure
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Carbon
Learn More
WSO2
Video Not Available
Overview
Windows Process Activation Service generalizes the Internet Information Services (IIS) process model, removing the dependency on HTTP. All the features of IIS that were previously available only to HTTP applications are now available to applications hosting Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) services, by using non-HTTP protocols. IIS 7.0 also uses Windows Process Activation Service for message-based activation over HTTP.

WSO2 Carbon redefines middleware by providing an integrated and componentized middleware platform that adapts to the specific needs of any enterprise IT project - on premise or in the cloud.

Sample Customers
Bank Alfalah Ltd., Harris Farm Markets, The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA), Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council, John Keells Holdings, Green Prefab, 343 Industries, SM Prime, Delhi Integrated Multi-Modal Transit System Ltd.
Bdigital, M-creations, Yenlo, Codenvy, Ohio Automobile Club
Buyer's Guide
Application Infrastructure
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, F5, Apache and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Windows Process Activation Services is ranked 23rd in Application Infrastructure while WSO2 Carbon [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Infrastructure. Windows Process Activation Services is rated 4.0, while WSO2 Carbon [EOL] is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Windows Process Activation Services writes "Central console enables us to see all of the activated and deactivated computers but it has poor alerts and frustrating technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 Carbon [EOL] writes "It allows you to deal with any mediation situation based on messages using concepts like proxy services and APIs". Windows Process Activation Services is most compared with Microsoft .NET Framework and IIS, whereas WSO2 Carbon [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.