Confluent Competitors and Alternatives

What is most valuable?

The ease of configuration for pipes is amazing. It has a lot of connectors. Mainly, we can do everything with the data in the pipe. I really like the graphical interface too. It's pretty nice.

How has it helped my organization?

It facilitates the consumption of the data in batch mode to the system where it is required. We don't do a lot of transformations or joining or forking of the information. It's more point-to-point connectivity that we implement over StreamSets.

What needs improvement?

I would like to see it integrate with other kinds of platforms, other than Java. We're going to have a lot of applications using .NET and other languages or frameworks. StreamSets is very helpful for the old Java platform but it's hard to... more»

What is most valuable?

As I have used more ESB features, I have grown to love this more than an API gateway. Developing and exposing your API using Mule ESB is also quite interesting and easy to use.

How has it helped my organization?

Using Mule ESB, we have solved all of the client’s integration needs. Because it was developed based on the Java Spring framework, it can easily be understood by folks with a Java background.

What needs improvement?

Some improvements are required in the batch component in case of errors in the batch steps and when processing a large volume of data.