We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

ConnectWise Automate OverviewUNIXBusinessApplication

ConnectWise Automate is #2 ranked solution in top Remote Monitoring and Management Software. IT Central Station users give ConnectWise Automate an average rating of 8 out of 10. ConnectWise Automate is most commonly compared to Pulseway:ConnectWise Automate vs Pulseway. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 31% of all views.
What is ConnectWise Automate?

ConnectWise Automate, formerly LabTech, is an IT management tool that helps deliver IT services at the speed of business. Our remote monitoring and management (RMM) platform provides powerful automation to discover & manage devices, monitor for problems, and automate action. Deliver streamlined reactive and proactive managed services, stop putting out fires, and start focusing on what matters most. See why over 5,500 partners worldwide chose ConnectWise Automate by visiting https://www.connectwise.com/software/automate or calling 877-522-8323.

ConnectWise Automate was previously known as LabTech for IT Service Providers, ConnectWise Automate for Corporate IT Departments, ConnectWise Automate for IT Service Providers.

ConnectWise Automate Buyer's Guide

Download the ConnectWise Automate Buyer's Guide including reviews and more. Updated: November 2021

ConnectWise Automate Customers

I-M Technology, Mainstay Technologies, PC Works Plus, Integrity IT, Kerkhoff Technologies Inc., Marathon Consulting, Christenberry Sales Company, EDTS, Secom Technology, Ready to View, ARRC Technology, DaVinci Digital, JNR Networks, Quinn Technology Solutions, PCIT, Liberty Technology, Capital Computers & Networks, Atlanta Technology Force, Doberman Technologies, First Column Enterprises, CisCom Solutions

ConnectWise Automate Video

Pricing Advice

What users are saying about ConnectWise Automate pricing:
  • "From what I've overheard, it is pretty comparable to other solutions in terms of price."

ConnectWise Automate Reviews

Filter by:
Filter Reviews
Industry
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Company Size
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Job Level
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Rating
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Considered
Loading...
Filter Unavailable
Order by:
Loading...
  • Date
  • Highest Rating
  • Lowest Rating
  • Review Length
Search:
Showingreviews based on the current filters. Reset all filters
DT
CEO & Senior Automation Administrator at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
A nicely ordered database and good UI but needs better monitoring

Pros and Cons

  • "The database is great. It's a nicely ordered database."
  • "Scheduling of automation could be improved and made more simple."

What is our primary use case?

We are a vendor that provides ConnectWise, which is pretty complicated. The end users do not know how to operate it and so they actually hire us to come in and manage admin and build stuff for it.

Most people are just using it for remote and basic monitoring and then that's why they hire us to come in and actually make it do what it's supposed to do, which is fully monitor and do automation. It's an automation foundation.

What is most valuable?

The UI is not too bad; it's more policy-driven stuff as opposed to individual stuff.

The database is great. It's a nicely ordered database.

Technical support is helpful.

The solution is stable.

I love the power shell cut and paste - that's amazing.

What needs improvement?

The solution needs to improve Event ID monitoring big time. They're behind the game on the other RMMs, and we support multiple RMMs. For instance Kayesa - the way they're doing event ID monitoring is local. ConnectWise has to ingest all of the event IDs and that equals large database growth and therefore nobody monitors those event IDs. That's a hurdle.

Scheduling of automation could be improved and made more simple. 

Obviously, performance across the board for everybody needs to be better. 

There are aspects of monitoring that are problematic.

Adding stuff that automates, and offering a better best practice out-of-the-box would be better.

The ability to control where the temporary folder is for automation and not having it in system 32 would be very useful.  

Maybe support for Python would be good, although that's not really even needed. The SQL's good already.

The solution could be better with not having to install a client locally, to be able to do the advanced stuff. If it was a totally web-based solution for instance. An engineer wanting to make changes and next-level automation stuff has to install a client locally right now. Removing that requirement and going full web, would be a good play.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've worked with the solution for many years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is pretty stable. there are no bugs or glitches. it doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution has got the same limitations as any other RMM - you're going to hit problems at around 6,000 to 10,000 endpoints, however, that's pretty much standard. At that point, even SAS can scale a little better. I don't think there are any issues with the scalability before that point. At that point, you will need to start fine-tuning what you're actually doing as every little thing hurts at 10,000 endpoints. Scalability is fine compared to all the other RMM solutions.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is really good. They are helpful and responsive. 

How was the initial setup?

Usually, pro services will leave customers at a point where they're able to remote and where they've got some basic monitoring. It's really difficult from there for the customer. They actually would have to hire someone in-house to maintain this solution. Typically, that's why clients hire us.

When they hire someone, they get the benefit of additional implementation. That said, pro services are pretty good. 

What we've seen is the MSPs don't have time to keep adding to it. When we see it, it's not bad, however, they're not seeing what drives are dying and they usually have got a bunch of stuff incorrectly set up, and they think it's working and it's not patching. Patching compliance is pretty low out of the box.

If knowledgeable ITs are setting it up, then it's pretty straightforward. The complexities average a five out of five. 

What about the implementation team?

Most everybody we've seen uses ConnectWise pro services to get it going and then from that point, they're at least at a point where it's operational. That said, in terms of adding stuff to it, they just don't do it.

What other advice do I have?

We have supported customers with all versions for multiple years.

We consult, there's no partnership. 

I would advise potential new users to hold off for now, as we don't know what's going to happen with the purchase of Continuum. ConnectWise bought Continuum, which is a totally different RMM and we know that the RMMs are being merged; Automate is being absorbed by Continuum. We don't know to what degree and we don't know what that product afterward is going to look like. There's a lot of change right now.

The key thing, and obviously for even us and all the other MSPs, is we don't know what it's going to end up looking like. Is it going to be more Continuum? Is it going to be more ConnectWise?

Continuum is a great product for MSPs that are smaller MSPs that don't have the time to do anything. There's no custom stuff, which is great due to the fact that it works.

ConnectWise is the complete opposite of that. It's very custom. You could do anything you want with it, however, it also requires skill and labor.

The question is where does this new merged product sit? If I have an MSP that's asking which arm and platform to go with, it might be an amazing product. It's probably going to end up being an amazing product, however, we don't know where it's at currently - especially for an on-prem customer. It's a big investment to not know what's about to happen.

I'd rate the solution at a solid seven out of ten. In my book, it's the top two compared to the other RMMs out there. It's a double-edged sword, however, with the customization you can do. That can work for you or against you. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
GW
Sr. IT Solutions Architect at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
MSP
Top 5Leaderboard
Good scripting and patch management, very stable, and easy to scale

Pros and Cons

  • "Scripting and patch management are really important for us. Patch Manager is something that we use a lot, and we would love to have it continually improved. It is one of the most useful features for us for controlling patches and other things for different clients."
  • "We use monitors to keep track of our machines. We use a pretty good portion of information from Automate."
  • "In Patch Manager, there should be more reportability so that it is easier to see the updates that I have applied to a machine and when the next update will happen. A lot of times, it seems like all the information is kind of thrown all over the place, and you can't really see it all at the same time. There should be a simplified patch data view that allows us to quickly confirm that our various clients are getting patched as they should be."
  • "We would love to get feature updates and cumulative updates fixed. I know they aren't really supposed to be pushed with Patch Manager. We've got recommendations from ConnectWise to use the scripted feature update installs, scripted KB updates, etc. Having these in Patch Manager itself would be great."
  • "The wait time for a support ticket to be addressed needs to be reduced. They take a couple of days to get back. It is a little frustrating when we have to wait for a couple of days. A lot of times, the issue is critical for us. If we're reaching out to their support team and submitting a ticket, it is because we need it handled quickly."

What is most valuable?

Scripting and patch management are really important for us. Patch Manager is something that we use a lot, and we would love to have it continually improved. It is one of the most useful features for us for controlling patches and other things for different clients.

We use monitors to keep track of our machines. We use a pretty good portion of information from Automate.

What needs improvement?

In Patch Manager, there should be more reportability so that it is easier to see the updates that I have applied to a machine and when the next update will happen. A lot of times, it seems like all the information is kind of thrown all over the place, and you can't really see it all at the same time. There should be a simplified patch data view that allows us to quickly confirm that our various clients are getting patched as they should be.

We would love to get feature updates and cumulative updates fixed. I know they aren't really supposed to be pushed with Patch Manager. We've got recommendations from ConnectWise to use the scripted feature update installs, scripted KB updates, etc. Having these in Patch Manager itself would be great.

The wait time for a support ticket to be addressed needs to be reduced. They take a couple of days to get back. It is a little frustrating when we have to wait for a couple of days. A lot of times, the issue is critical for us. If we're reaching out to their support team and submitting a ticket, it is because we need it handled quickly. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for one and a half years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Its stability is quite good from my experience. Most of the time, if there is an issue, it is because of something that caused it. We don't seem to experience random issues very often. We are able to deal with and handle most of the stuff that we encounter.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Now that we have it in place, it is quite easy for us to scale. If we onboard a new client, we can quickly put them in there with little to no effort. It is very scalable for us.

How are customer service and technical support?

Their tech support is hit or miss from my experience. There are two support lines. You have the immediate chat where you can just do a live chat with an agent, and then there is also the ticket submittal kind of process. From my experience, rather than actually providing specific solutions, the people in the instant chat end up saying, "Go to this link." They pretty much just send us to various ConnectWise documentation pages rather than actually providing a solution and helping us dive into the issue. Their chat is like, "Well, this documentation page is in reference to what you're referring to. So, take a look at this."

One of the things that I would ask them to improve is the wait time. If we're in the instant chat system, a lot of times what happens is that we'll get to a point where the person on the instant chat says that he or she is going to escalate this up into a ticket, and then they'll have somebody reach back. In our experience, when that happens, it means that we're not going to hear back for a couple of days. A lot of times, the issue is critical for us. If we're reaching out to ConnectWise's support team and submitting a ticket, it is because we need it handled quickly. So, a lot of times, it is a little frustrating when we have to wait for a couple of days before we even hear back.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I do know that they used Kaseya previously, but I wasn't here at that time. I am not sure about the specifics of differences, but I do know that we are happier now after switching from Kaseya. I know they had difficulties with Kaseya, but I don't know the full extent of it.

How was the initial setup?

I was not a part of the initial setup. It was somebody who used to work for us, but I do remember overhearing about it. It definitely was a long setup process. It required some adjustments, etc.  

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

From what I've overheard, it is pretty comparable to other solutions in terms of price.

What other advice do I have?

It is as powerful as you use it to be. If someone is just going to use it for remote access and things like that, they will be wasting a lot of money. It is as good as you make it. My recommendation would be that if you're not going to use all of the features, you can use another solution. For example, ConnectWise Automate implements ScreenConnect, which is another one of their products that provides just the remote access screen connection to the machines. For some of our clients who don't really need full monitoring, we just have a screen connection available.

I would rate ConnectWise Automate an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Flag as inappropriate
Learn what your peers think about ConnectWise Automate. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2021.
554,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RB
IT Support Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Easy to deploy with great scalability and good reporting

Pros and Cons

  • "The initial setup is easy and the deployment is quick."
  • "Their support needs to be better."

What is our primary use case?

We primarily use the solution to manage our clients. We use the solution to get into their computers for remote support and tasks of that nature.

What is most valuable?

The reporting on the product is great.

Remote fixes are very useful. There are some of the automated fixes and patches, which is stuff that we really don't have to worry about too much anymore.

The stability is okay.

The initial setup is easy and the deployment is quick. 

The solution can definitely scale. 

What needs improvement?

The product needs to offer more integration with other tools. 

Their support needs to be better. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for about two years. It's been a while. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is mostly pretty good. There are no bugs and it doesn't crash or freeze. However, their email connector is kind of spotty sometimes.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable. There shouldn't be an issue with expanding if a company needs to do so. 

We have 50 people on the solution right now, which is basically everybody, and we wouldn't have an issue going up and having more users. I'd say, at this time, the solution is being extensively used. 

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support on offer could be better. It's just the process that's not so good right now. For example, there are no phone calls. It's all on email. If I were to rate their level of service, I'd give them a six out of ten.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have used different solutions in the past. I'm not a hundred percent sure why we ultimately switched to this product. It was a decision that was above my pay grade.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is very straightforward. It's not overly complex or difficult. A company shouldn't have any issues with it.

We kind of did the deployment over time, however, it didn't take long to deploy. We had it up and going relatively quickly. It took maybe a few hours in total. While it took a few days to compile a few details, we'd do an hour here or an hour there with a consultant over that time to get it done. 

There's no real downtime in terms of updates and maintenance. We get an alert that there's an update and we do it in production so that we have no downtime. 

What about the implementation team?

During the implementation process, we used a consultant from ConnectWise. It was part of their setup offering. Overall, the experience with them was very positive. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

While it's my understanding that we pay for the solution on a monthly basis, I cannot say what the exact costs are. 

What other advice do I have?

We're just a customer and an end-user.

We've got probably the most recent version. We update it every time we are able to.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten, mostly due to the fact that it is very scalable. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
Chris Walters
Voip Network Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
MSP
Top 5Leaderboard
Saves us a lot of time and money; some issues with menu loading

Pros and Cons

  • "A good automated scripts feature."
  • "The menu doesn't always load properly."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case of this solution is for managing systems, being able to see them online and offline. I use the solution as a shortcut to ConnectWise Control, because the way our permissions are set up in our actual ConnectWise Control portal, our internal systems can't be reached. I need to use Automate in order to control my system at the office if I need to do something inside the company LAN. I'm the VoIP network engineer at InfiNet Solutions.

What is most valuable?

The automated scripts feature means that we can set up for a lot of different things and they have reduced tech input drastically, in the sense that a task only needs to be done once instead of 100 times.

What needs improvement?

I have issues with the menu, a lot of the time it doesn't load properly on initial login and I have to refresh and reload everything before I can actually search through agents. It can just sit there and spin on you at the initial login. I know we get some false positives at times, where things report offline and then when we connect to them with control they're connectable. They're definitely online, the agent just fails to report sometimes. I don't know the specifics of why it does that.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using this solution for almost four years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability is okay. There's random stuff that we find all the time, just like with any software. You can always find something if you look hard enough. The main issues that we've had as far as bugs or glitches go are related to other things, like when an AWS stack went down and it knocked out our sign-on server, cutting access for four hours until we were able to actually manipulate some code in their database to stop accessing that sign-on server and allow us to use the local log-ins we used to use. That's more connected to the ConnectWise as a whole, not Automate.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable to any size you want to scale it to. We currently have 15 techs using it. These are level one, two and three service technicians.

How was the initial setup?

I can only comment as a user where it's just a matter of logging in because everything has been created on the administration backside. There's not really much setup at all that I go through as an end user.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend exploring the features and the pricing model before purchase. It seems like a few years ago our pricing model was a little better than it is currently. I know there are solutions coming on the market with some pretty aggressive pricing models where you're paying on a per tech license rather than a per agent license. Automate is a per deployed agent rather than per tech so if we're 15 techs working on 3000 computers, it's a lot better to pay the tech license than the agent license.

I would rate this solution a six out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
KC
Information Security Manager at a recruiting/HR firm with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Stable but needs better reporting and more transparent overviews

Pros and Cons

  • "It's definitely improved the help-desk servicing, et cetera."
  • "They could use some automated alerts particularly when we're talking about an MSP that might shoot over."

What is our primary use case?

Automate also pushes out patching and different things to different products that we have. We also use it to desktop manage, et cetera.

Our third-party provider uses ConnectWise as their ticketing system.

What is most valuable?

It's definitely improved the help-desk servicing, et cetera. 

The solution is very stable.

What needs improvement?

I don't know whether it's a third-party provider, however, the reporting, et cetera, is not what I would expect. They offer their reporting outside that system. I would say that either it's not turned on or not configured. I don't actually have the licensing for that product. That's my MSP, however, in terms of what I'm able to see and what I could see, I would say that it really needs to improve on it. They need better visibility and reporting and alerts and different things.

They basically need reporting and transparent overviews and management of analysis tools and different things like history graphing. They could use some automated alerts particularly when we're talking about an MSP that might shoot over. It would be good if they could say "Hey, we've had a cluster of incidents," that would trigger our automatic updates. That would be really good.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using the solution, likely for less than a year. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is very stable. It's reliable. There are no bugs and glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution seems to be scalable. We've continued to use it as we grow and it's been fine for us so far.

Just the IT team uses the solution. There are five internal users and about seven external users that log onto that system and use it. Automate pushes out and connects up to all our devices, et cetera, and pushes out updates. However, in terms of people that actually sign on to the program, it's just the IT team.

How are customer service and technical support?

While I'm sure that they offer technical support, I have no direct experience dealing with them and therefore I can't speak to how helpful or responsive they would be.

How was the initial setup?

The product seems to be pretty straightforward to implement. 

We do have one license, however, mostly we use the web link that they've given us. I would say that it was a fairly quick install for them to get that up and running. 

The deployment process was pretty quick. It was likely less than a month.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We don't pay for that license, et cetera, due to the fact that we use an MSP.

What other advice do I have?

As we use a cloud deployment, we are always using the latest version of the solution. 

I'd rate the solution at a five out of ten. It's just a bit basic.

I wouldn't recommend the solution to others at this time. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
Elmira Iravani
Network Administrator at Hanatech
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Easy to implement, very stable, and offers lots of great features

Pros and Cons

  • "The implementation is nice and easy."
  • "I have a problem with the reports available on the solution. I don't understand how to work with the reporting functionality. For example, when I want to give a report for a specific machine, ConnectWise doesn't seem to have this as an option. I'm not sure if I'm missing something, or if the reporting functionality is just poorly conceived."

What is our primary use case?

We are a service provider. The solution is primarily used as both an in-work controller and central control.

What is most valuable?

There are many features within the solution, however, I find that I usually use control or remote solutions. 

I appreciate how I can check the user statuses, including IP addresses, flags, etc., and see the last login of the user.

The implementation is nice and easy.

What needs improvement?

I have a problem with the reports available on the solution. I don't understand how to work with the reporting functionality. For example, when I want to give a report for a specific machine, ConnectWise doesn't seem to have this as an option. I'm not sure if I'm missing something, or if the reporting functionality is just poorly conceived.

In the future, it would be nice if they also had a Service Desk integration between ConnectWise Manage and ConnectWise Automate. Some tickets should be automatically created in Automate and then passed to Manage.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using the solution for five months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability of the solution is great. Everything is working well. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't freeze or crash. It's reliable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of the solution is questionable. I've had some issues. I can't quite remember what they were, however, I remember scaling being a problem for us.

We have about 110 agents on the solution right now, and we purchased 125 in total.

We use it all of the time, every day. We may increase usage in the future, as we do use it often.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support has been good. Everyone we have been in contact with has responded to our queries in a reasonable amount of time. We've found them to be helpful and knowledgeable.

They also have an excellent Live Chat option, which I've used many, many times. It's very easy to connect with them.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We never used another solution before choosing this product.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is not complex. It's quite straightforward.

Deployment is super fast and only takes about two minutes.

What about the implementation team?

I handled the implementation myself. I didn't need the help of a reseller or integrator.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We originally bought 125 agents and we do plan to potentially increase them in the future. I'm not sure of what the exact cost was, however.

What other advice do I have?

We're a partner with ConnectWise.

We're most likely using the latest version of the solution.

I'd advise those considering using the solution to work to integrate everything they can.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
DK
Network Support Specialist IV at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
MSP
Intuitive user-friendly interface, but could have better links to other ticketing systems

Pros and Cons

  • "ConnectWise Automate's interface is pretty easy to use. It's pretty intuitive to get around and navigate it. It does what I need, which is usually connecting to the client and customers systems."
  • "There could be better linkages between ConnectWise Automate and Manage from a ticketing perspective. Automate and Manage each has its own ticketing system. We use the one in Manage, but it'd be nice if they were linked directly to the one in Automate."

What is our primary use case?

We use ConnectWise Automate to monitor and maintain customer systems. It allows us to administrate remote access chains. So basically we use it for administration, remote access, assistance, and help desk services. We currently have about 10 staff using it on our side. They're support specialists ranging from tier one to tier three.

How has it helped my organization?

ConnectWise Automate made it easier to keep in contact with customers while working remotely.

What is most valuable?

ConnectWise Automate's interface is pretty easy to use. It's pretty intuitive to get around and navigate it. It does what I need, which is usually connecting to the client and customers systems. I can just help them from home or from work.

What needs improvement?

There could be better linkages between ConnectWise Automate and Manage from a ticketing perspective. Automate and Manage each has its own ticketing system. We use the one in Manage, but it'd be nice if they were linked directly to the one in Automate.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've been using ConnectWise for a couple of years now.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

So far, Automate seems pretty stable. I don't think we've had any big issues with having to reboot it that often. Once in a while needs a reboot, but It's too frequently as far as I can tell. Not too terribly much.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I'm still unsure about ConnectWise's scalability. Automate seems like it can scale, but we don't have the biggest customer base in the world, so it is hard for me to say.

What other advice do I have?

Since I didn't implement it, I only have advice on usage. So far, it's doing what we need it to do. But as is the case with most of these types of products, eventually we're going to need to go to a remote solution that's not third-party.

I would rate ConnectWise Automate a seven out of 10. It's pretty average for what we're using it to do.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
TE
Senior NOC and Automation Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
MSP
Very scalable and good premium support

Pros and Cons

  • "It is very scalable."
  • "Patching and reporting need improvements, especially reporting. The reporting engine is quite outdated, so you end up having to use your own dashboard."

What is our primary use case?

It is a monitoring and automation platform. So, you handle alerts, and then you automate the fixes.

We are using its latest version. It is cloud-based.

What is most valuable?

It is very scalable. 

What needs improvement?

Patching and reporting need improvements, especially reporting. The reporting engine is quite outdated, so you end up having to use your own dashboard.

It should have an Azure functionality because, at the minute, there is no Azure functionality we can automate. It is missing the Azure functionality out of everything. Other than that, it's great.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is very scalable. I would rate it quite highly there. 

We are an MSP and distributor. We have over 500 customers.

How are customer service and support?

Their premium support is great. If you don't have premium support, you can sometimes have a lot of difficulties with getting the correct point across.

How was the initial setup?

Its initial setup is complex.

What was our ROI?

I'd probably rate it a 10 out of 10 in terms of ROI.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend it. I would advise ensuring that you have a team behind it that can run it internally as well, and you're not just relying on ConnectWise themselves.

I'd rate it a nine out of 10. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer:
Flag as inappropriate
Buyer's Guide
Download our free ConnectWise Automate Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.