Control-M Previous Solutions

ANIRUDHRAMESH
Production Engineer at Alphaserve Technologies®
My main experience is with this as the central unit, but I have used other tools. The main reason I chose Control-M was firstly that it is user-friendly. Secondly, the market is wide open for Control-M, and a lot of other organizations use it. So it gives Control-M the upper hand in the market to work on something like this. View full review »
SystemAd1832
System Admin and Architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Oracle Database backup teams used to do this all themselves via cron. Now, they have automated cron to Control-M for a lot of our database backups where they used to do this outside of Control-M. Other than that, I think everybody is using it. View full review »
controlm6ba7
Control-M Analyst at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
When I got there, we had Robot Schedule. With this solution, I couldn't see the job connecting, which was sort of frustrating. It was like, "Hey, where does this one go?" I know Robot Schedule has advanced. However, we had Robot Schedule and Control-M, and we migrated off of Robot Schedule and moved everything to Control-M. and I was part of that process. I just felt so much better after we phased off Robot Schedule. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, CA (A Broadcom Company), IBM and others in Workload Automation. Updated: October 2019.
370,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Jim Perrone
E-Business Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
They did previously use CA-7 for the mainframe. They switched for the ability to use both distributed and mainframe from one central point. View full review »
Bhanu Prakash Badiginchala
Application Automation Deveoper with 1,001-5,000 employees
I had used Cron scheduler for a short time, but it can be considered almost zero experience. My understanding is that BMC Control-M is years ahead in terms of usability & visibility. View full review »
Robert-Stinnett
Automation Analyst at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Prior to using this product, we used homemade solutions and we outgrew them. View full review »
ManagerD502d
Manager Digital Solutions at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
We previously used CA products. View full review »
TeamLdr34546
Team Lead at a transportation company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Previously we used some collection of ad hoc tools. It was a consolidated solution, i.e. a single solution that was used across the board. View full review »
ITManageeb44
IT Manager at a Consumer Goods with 201-500 employees
The biggest reason for upgrading what we currently have, is the workforce becoming more mobile and we need to give users easier access to submit help desk tickets. That is why we are looking for a solution that can offer this feature. View full review »
KeyurPatel
Control-M Tech Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We did not use another solution prior to this one. View full review »
DataCent0d56
Data Center Operations Supervisor at a non-tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We had a BMC competing product, then we integrated it with Control-M. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, CA (A Broadcom Company), IBM and others in Workload Automation. Updated: October 2019.
370,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email