The solution is stable so I rate stability a nine out of ten. 

Traps is quite a stable product. Once it was properly deployed and configured, you have nothing to be worried about.

When the product was updated, I also worked on the latest version.

The stability is pretty good except for one or two cases. Based on the performance, it's been okay. It's got pretty high performance. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

Its stability is very good.

The stability of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a nine out of ten.

The product is stable enough.

I rate the solution’s stability a ten out of ten.

The product is 100% stable. I have never received any complaints from the customers.

It has been stable. I have not had any issues with it.

It is very stable.

It is a stable solution since it is on the cloud. CPU utilization and hardware requirements are not necessary. According to some user licenses, when we purchase them, we get much utilization of hardware requirements through the cloud.

It's very stable. There are no errors or problems, even if there is something we need to do on the machine. Due to the configuration we already do, it's locking a lot of things that the users cannot do. Even if the administrator is working, it needs the Cortex XDR permission first. It's very stable and the configuration is easy in the portal. They are enhancing their configuration and its security constantly. 

The only thing that is giving us a hard time is they have a lot of version upgrades. I don't know if it's better to do it as update packages and make the upgrades half-year, quarter a year, or every year. It should be done more regularly.

From an administrative perspective, it'll give us less headache. Each time you need just to go to the portal and make sure that you're testing the product, the upgrade before you deploy it, and then you deploy it. And then you figure out which computer doesn't have the version, and you figure out how to install it. 

If it's a laptop on the other side, it'll take a long time, sometimes a week, to get the customer the upgrade. For installing the upgrade, we must do it. The users can't install this product by themselves. That's why it takes a while. 

The solution is stable. 

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is stable.

The stability is great. I think they set the standard for SDR solutions at the moment.

The solution is very stable. I pretty much depend on product stability. Over the last six months, we have been able to see it's that Palo Alto is more stable than most. There is no such issue in that regard. 

This is a very stable product, whether it is running on a database or email system or on any platform. It works perfectly fine.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is absolutely stable.

The solution is stable.

I rate the stability of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks an eight out of ten.

The stability is very good.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is highly stable. 

We don't have any user reports suggesting that there is a high level of resource consumption.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks should be a stable solution.

It's incredibly stable. It's Palo Alto; it's top of the line.

It's fairly stable. They do have bugs which come up every once in a while, but they're usually good about getting them taken care of within a release.

I rate Cortex XDR a ten out of ten for stability.

It's a very stable solution. I would rate it a nine out of ten in terms of stability.

Cortex XDR is quite stable.

We have not experienced any issues with respect to stability at this point.

Cortex XDR is stable.

The solution is stable. I would rate its stability a nine out of ten. 

The product is stable. Palo Alto only works on security, and the product by default is stable. They are releasing new features, OS, and an ML-based thing on the firewall itself, which is quite impressive. Palo Alto is quite stable compared to other competitors in the market.

I have found this solution as NG AV is most stable compare with other solution

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Network is a stable solution. I have been working with it for years, and it only went down once.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give stability a nine.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a stable product.

It is stable. From the moment we installed it has been up with no restarts of maintenance until now.  

Stability has improved over the years, as there were noticeable bugs in earlier releases, such as 3.x. With the later releases, versions 4.1 through 5, they have polished the product. It has gotten much better.

When major releases come out with new features, it is a fairly simple process to upgrade these releases.

It is 100 percent utilized with every feature turned on. We leverage their product to the fullest extent.

The solution is quite stable. The only hiccup we had experienced was related to some false alerts where there was no detection, yet still the product showed that it detected something. There were a few false positives. Apart from that, it is quite stable.

The solution is very stable. We have about 350 licenses across all our PCs, and of course, only administrators are allowed to plug in.

There are no performance issues. It's really very stable. I haven't dealt with bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. 

No issues

It is stable. I haven't found any issues.

The platform is stable. As far as you have the internet, the product is secure.

The solution is stable. 

The stability of this product is very good.

The stability was quite good. We never had any issue with it at all.

It's a stable product.

The stability is good but I did face one issue that I want to point out. I don't know about the new version but in the old version, sometimes not all your devices are showing properly. Sometimes they show as "inactive."

No.

Cortex XDR is highly stable. 

The solution has been very stable and very reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's one of the best on the market.

Security people usually think it's a very powerful solution. However, government teams always worry about the security of the cloud and always need to send approvals. Since this solution is not a normal endpoint, it can be a bit tricky for compliance purposes.

At the same time, it does its job. It's very good at vulnerability management.

That said, it is really not really flexible to make deployments on certain platforms. It's really complicated. Sometimes the solution falls off.

When I was experimenting with stability early on, I did run into issues when testing the solution in the sandbox.

Eventually, it catches one of the executive files and if you go to the management section of the solution and you release this file, it takes seven or eight tries to do it. You need to keep trying, again and again, using the same procedures to release the file for usage. That was in the beginning and we still have this issue, even though they made a new GUI for management. It's still not resolved.

Mostly positive. We've had some episodes early on where upgrades caused some issues with the backend database, but that seems to have cleared up. This issue would not impact the Traps 5.0 users as it is SaaS based.

The solution is stable, we have not had any issues.

The product is very stable and the performance is good. It doesn't slow down the systems it runs on. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

The stability is good. 

It's very stable. I've never experienced downtime for the ASM console or ASM core. But we experienced this for the database, and it was not clear in Trap's interface. So, Trap's server stopped working, stopped getting jobs, stopped the enforcing policies because the database was full. We did not get any alert for that, so you will not see any alert on the ESM console that says that your database is about to fill up. It was not reachable and there was no warning or indication for this. You have to go to some tools internally and check in the command line, to see. You will see some errors for the DB, and you will realize that it's a DB issue. I've never experienced any issue with the Traps itself, but with the database.

It has been extremely stable.

The solution is stable.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a stable solution.

It's a stable solution.

It is stable. I have never faced any kind of issues or never heard from any of my colleagues that they have faced any kind of issue.

This is a stable product and it is good, but we will keep evaluating other products as we continue to offer this type of solution to our customers.

It is very stable. I wouldn't recommend the latest version. Being a new version, it would have bugs, which is similar to the new versions of other products.

Cortex XDR is stable enough.

This solution is stable.

The stability of the solution is very good. We have about 100 users on it right now, and we use it twice a week.