CrossBrowserTesting Previous Solutions

Maggie Jones
QA Automation Engineer and Web Developer at cleverbridge
We previously used Sauce Labs. They were too expensive and their support team was always opaque in their answers to our questions. View full review »
marketacumen
President at Market Acumen, Inc.
We previous use BrowserCam, and they went out of business. View full review »
reviewer1072422
User
We did not use a solution prior to this one. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, BrowserStack, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Dylan Goldade
QA Analyst / Software QC at Quartzy, Inc
We did not have a previous solution. View full review »
reviewer874593
Software Quality Assurance Engineer
We did not use another solution prior to this. View full review »
reviewer1007001
User
We used Telerik Test studio for CrossBrowserTesting but found CrossBrowserTesting miles better instead. View full review »
reviewer1026108
User
I had used BrowserStack; we switched to CBT because it is easy to have parallel users. View full review »
hima
User at R & L Carriers
We had to use a physical device which was not available. We also had other technical problems that delayed testing time. View full review »
reviewer1041558
User
No. CrossBrowserTesting is my first tool and a pretty good one to use anytime. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, BrowserStack, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: March 2020.
407,845 professionals have used our research since 2012.