CrossBrowserTesting Previous Solutions

Maggie Jones
QA Automation Engineer and Web Developer at a tech vendor with 201-500 employees
We previously used Sauce Labs. They were too expensive and their support team was always opaque in their answers to our questions. View full review »
marketacumen
President at a tech consulting company with 1-10 employees
We previous use BrowserCam, and they went out of business. View full review »
reviewer1072422
User
We did not use a solution prior to this one. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, BrowserStack, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: November 2019.
382,892 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Dylan Goldade
QA Analyst / Software QC at Quartzy, Inc
We did not have a previous solution. View full review »
reviewer874593
Software Quality Assurance Engineer
We did not use another solution prior to this. View full review »
reviewer1007001
User
We used Telerik Test studio for CrossBrowserTesting but found CrossBrowserTesting miles better instead. View full review »
reviewer1026108
User
I had used BrowserStack; we switched to CBT because it is easy to have parallel users. View full review »
hima
User at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We had to use a physical device which was not available. We also had other technical problems that delayed testing time. View full review »
reviewer1041558
User
No. CrossBrowserTesting is my first tool and a pretty good one to use anytime. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, BrowserStack, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: November 2019.
382,892 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email