We haven't had any issues with scalability. Being a cloud solution, it can scale well. 

It was originally deployed to 200 users and we haven't really grown since we started, so I can't speak to scalability. This represents 100% adoption in our organization, and there are no current plans to grow. As we hire more people, our usage will increase.

There are two people who work with it on a daily basis. There is the director of IT and a network administrator.

It is a cloud-based solution - so scalability is not an issue.

The scalability has been fast and easy. We did so many endpoints very quickly without any issues.

It is fully deployed across our organization. We can't really expand anymore unless we are adding/buying clinics.

We have had no problems with scalability. CrowdStrike can scale as much as we need them to, they are the ones taking care of all the cloud, hosting, and processing on their end. So, we have never had an issue where we have seen a degradation in alerting timing, etc.

There are probably 10 to 15 people who access CrowdStrike or use its data regularly. It is funny because our IT people will use it to try to look for things that aren't necessarily security sorts of things, for example, "Hey, this isn't working," or, "That isn't loading," because of the level of visibility CrowdStrike has in some of the processing item. We have four or five people on the SOC. There are probably 20 or 30 accounts in there, but for the ones which are used regularly, it is probably about half that amount, like seven to 10.

It is very scalable. There have been no issues at all.

CrowdStrike is scalable. We can query large amounts of data, and the solution responds well, whereas Splunk takes a longer time to perform a search operation.

I rate CrowdStrike Falcon ten out of ten for scalability. 

CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable.

The solution is very scalable. Our proof of concept was a few devices and now at full scale we have 50,000 devices. It's a cloud console, so if you do the implementation right and the sensor is put on in an automated process, it doesn't matter how many computers you have. It just runs. They have sensors for every kind of device: Macs, Windows, Linux, and I think even Android.

We have a single instance across multiple locations. People in the company work from different locations, and we have agents installed to workstations, et cetera. We have around 8,000 workstations and around 5,000 servers. Then, we have about 20 people working on it directly regularly.

The solution is absolutely scalable, and companies can scale it as needed. I'd rate the solution 9 out of 10 in terms of scalability. 

CrowdStrike Falcon scales well. We are using it in a large environment with no problems.

If you have a way to deploy agents in a rapid manner, I think the scalability is there. As we buy and acquire companies, we have to roll out agents to those places. Right now, it's still very manually intensive and it slows down the process a lot. So, I think the scalability can be improved with a rapid deployment feature.

Our strategy right now is just to install CrowdStrike for PCs and laptops. Once we get comfortable with the technology, we can start testing the servers. It's just that we haven't finished the deployment to PCs and workstations yet.

We have approximately 260 endpoints and we're probably about 20% complete in terms of deployment.

It seems to be limitless from a scalability standpoint. Definitely, there would be no impact on our end, and we haven't noticed or run into any issues as we scaled from our initial 10 systems to 600. There was no difference in speed or reporting, et cetera.

So, scalability does not seem to be an issue.

The solution is very scalable and easy to deploy as well as sync up agents with it.

The end users are the security team, which consists of about four of us. Then, we have a couple of leads from other technical teams. So, there are probably eight users who have access to CrowdStrike. Primarily, there are just three of us who are in there constantly.

We have approximately 5,000 machines that are being managed. As time moves on, this number will grow, but we don't expect it to get larger in the near future.

The solution is very scalable but we had issues with some groups, that manage their own devices and wanted to have access to self-manage them. We weren't able to do that, unfortunately.

The solution is scalable. We do not yet have the requirement to take an in-depth look at scalability. 

I rate scalability an eight out of ten. 

I would rate the scalability of CrowdStrike Falcon eight out of ten.

We've deployed CrowdStrike Falcon across all 3,000 of our endpoints, and it has demonstrated excellent scalability. Therefore, scalability is not a concern for CrowdStrike in terms of performance or its ability to handle growth.

I would rate the scalability a 9 out of 10.

We are a relatively small firm, but I have had no problems in my deployment plans. I could easily see this scaling upwards.

In total, we are protecting roughly 1500 endpoints.

I would rate Crowdstrike Falcon a nine out of 10 for scalability. It offers seamless scalability, allowing easy expansion of the sensor deployment to accommodate growing needs. However, it's worth noting that the primary limitation one may encounter is the cost associated with deploying additional sensors.

From what we have seen, it is very scalable. We have recently acquired a company where someone had a ransomware attack when we joined networks. Within the course of just a few days, we were able to easily get CrowdStrike rolled out to about 300 machines. That also included the removal of that company's legacy anti-malware tool.

We have all our desktop engineering group and server team as admins in the system, but they only use it for specific troubleshooting in their job roles. So, if the server team needs to do something, then they can just log in and do it as well as the desktop engineering group. They can just go in and do stuff, if it is something related to computers or servers. As far as for the overall management of the system, that is left to the security team.

It is currently being used to the extent that we need it. After CrowdStrike had their user conference last Fall, they introduced a lot of new tools, specifically one around forensic that we would like to get our hands on. However, there are no real plans for doing any major increases of its toolset. I do know that there is a project that will be going on for using its mobile application on some Android tablets, but it is still very much in its infancy. So, we are not quite sure how that will roll out yet.

The solution is easily scalable. A company shouldn't have any issues with that aspect of the solution.

The scalability of CrowdStrike Falcon is quite good. There are around 2,000 users in our organization. I would rate it an eight out of ten. There are a few things, such as the forensic part and the investigation, that can be improved.

The solution has been successfully deployed in thousands of enterprises, so it is proven to be scalable. Major customers are using it, indicating that scalability is not a concern.

CrowdStrike Falcon is a scalable solution.

We have approximately 800 people using this solution in my organization.

Once you are onboarded, they can activate different features on the same platform for you. You don't need to do the redeployment every time you click on a feature for the customer. This makes upselling really easy.

CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable enough for our needs.

We have approximately 250 people using this solution in my organization.

We are protecting 5,500 endpoints with this solution. We do have plans to increase usage. Our environment is rather complex in that we have 6,000 core corporate associates and roughly 5,500 endpoints. Then, we have a distributor network globally comprised of about 220 wholly owned subsidiaries who are essentially their own companies, but they are only licensed to resell our products. They kind of have a mix of endpoint protection because it is largely up to them, within their entity, as what they choose to use. We are looking to further wrap our arms around them from a security perspective. We have looked at acquiring CrowdStrike's complete platform, which would be fully managed to deploy to that distributor network, which is about the same size as our corporate environment. So, it would be roughly another 6,000 users. It is a very large, globally-reaching endeavor, and working through the politics and legal aspects of how we will make that come to fruition may take some time. However, that is the plan.

We have almost 3,000 users using this solution. 

We have 55 people currently using the solution. 

This is a scalable product.

This is a scalable solution because it is cloud based. 

The product is scalable. We have about 15 people working on it right now. 

The solution is scalable.

We have approximately 1,000 users using this solution in my organization. We plan to increase usage in the future.

I would rate the scalability of CrowdStrike Falcon as a ten out of ten.

CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable. Adding new features or licenses to CrowdStrike Falcon is seamless, with no disruption to our system's performance. Installing new modules is easy because it uses the same sensor.

The product is very scalable. You can extend it as needed.

We have between 220 and 300 users at this time. 

This solution is very scalable. It is easy to roll out more agents and is fairly automated. We have it deployed in multiple environments such as hybrid versus cloud versus private. 

At this time, we have between 5,000 and 6,000 endpoints.

Scalability is expensive but it works. We've installed it on more than 900 machines in the corporation and it covers every role from civil engineers, architects, HR people, office workers and the server. Maintenance takes the equivalent of one full-time position but it's a shared responsibility among the IT team. 

The scalability is excellent; top tier. There are about 15 end users in our company, and they are members of the security team. We plan to increase our usage of the solution. 

I would rate the scalability of CrowdStrike Falcon a nine out of ten.

CrowdStrike is a cloud-based solution, so it's always scalable. You can adjust your endpoint licenses at any time, so if your endpoint is decommissioned, you can reduce the licenses. If you want to add few more endpoints, you only need to deploy the agents. We have provided CrowdStrike Falcon EDR solutions for many clients, and the largest is about 2,000 licenses. 

CrowdStrike Falcon is highly scalable.

CrowdStrike Falcon is implemented company-wide on every device.

I have approximately one hundred protected endpoints, but the number of users that log on to the tools is approximately four.

CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable.

CrowdStrike Falcon's scalability is good. We have thousands of students using this solution. 

The scalability of CrowdStrike Falcon is very high. It is scaled across all of our systems without any problem.

We have approximately 1,000 people using this solution across the USA. We have plans to continue our user base and any additional endpoints will have CrowdStrike Falcon on them.

As we are a smaller organization, scalability hasn't been an issue. It's been very good so far. 

We have about 120 users and they include technical people, salespeople, project managers, and developers.

This solution is being widely used in our organization as it is mandatory. All of our users need to have it. 

We don't really handle the scaling. I can't speak to that aspect of the product.

We have about 300 to 400 agents running.

It is a scalable product. 

I have found CrowdStrike Falcon to be scalable.

CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable. I've only got one hundred endpoints and I know companies that are hundreds of times bigger who use it.

We had a small shop, so we never had any reason to scale.

The product is very scalable. The solution can scale well, especially for small setups looking to expand out in the future.

CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable. We have below 1,000 endpoints and it scales well.

We have approximately 700 to 800 people using the solution. Additionally, we have approximately 150 servers running with 815 clients.

It amazes me. For instance, we have an end-user with 15,000 users right now and we deployed it in one week. It's a very short time considering other solutions, some of which can take one to two years to deploy completely.

We didn't go with the Basic version. We went with Superior. Even the insurance companies are also sold on this product. 

We find that the solution is very, very scalable as a tool and it can completely manage and protect the endpoint. It offers around 99.99% of your protection and assurance and can scale up however much you like.

We have implemented it for approximately 200 users as a POC. We are ready to have a contract with CrowdStrike and we will be implementing it for 700 users in the end, so we will scale it from the POC when we begin to officially use it.

Crowdstrike Falcon XDR is scalable for what we use it for. We are using the maximum number of endpoints, which is 1,000.

The solution is scalable, we have 1900 users. 

CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable. We have approximately 400 servers using this solution.

We have plans to increase the usage of this solution in one or two years.

We're a small company so the scalability is fine for us.

The scalability has been good so far. We have been using it on-premise and on the cloud. We can move it to a different cloud platform, because it is cloud agnostic.

I would rate the scalability of CrowdStrike Falcon 8 out of 10.

CrowdStrike Falcon XDR is simply scalable.

In my opinion, it all comes down to what is your pocket saying., and the number, of users. 

From my perspective, it's a very scalable product.

All of your endpoints are using this solution.

In our company, we have approximately 372 users.

We haven't had any problems with scalability and it expands with the company's needs.

We have 20,000 users and about 20 of them are administrators.

The scalability of the solution is good. If a company needs to expand out, they can do so easily with this solution.

In our organization, we have about 2,500 people using the solution. We already use the solution at 100% capacity, meaning everyone in the company uses it. If new employees are onboarded, they also use the solution. Chances are, we will increase usage int he future.

There is scalability but this is not our focus.

It is scalable. We have 700 users, and we plan to increase the usage. We only need about three technical staff for deployment and maintenance, a senior systems engineer and two infrastructure managers.

The scalability of CrowdStrike Falcon is good.

We have approximately 500 people using this solution in my organization.

There are no issues in terms of scalability. 

There are 5,000 users using the solution.

Per my experience, CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable.

This is a scalable solution. 

The solution is scalable. 

Scalability is super easy. The deployment was easy. It's all price based. Money is the biggest challenge, not deploying it. It requires one system engineer. 

We have around 400 users. There are five of us who manage it, including the help desk, system engineers, and the director.

It's a scalable solution. They are running 1400 endpoints on it right now, and it seems to be fine.

There is only one person working at it right now and they are the security engineer/operator.

If you look at how they spend their day, a tool like that does a lot with a little and can make a one man band pretty effective or much more effective. It makes the response to an issue right when it happens way more possible with such small security. 

It has met every scale need that we have come across.

CrowdStrike Falcon has been able to scale to our needs with no issues.

The scalability of CrowdStrike Falcon is very good.

We have approximately 700 users are using this solution in my organization. We plan to increase the usage of this solution. We are evaluating various aspects of the environment to see how it can extend our protection.

This is simply a client that you have to roll out, so it is fully scalable.

All of the people in our company use this solution.

It is the most scalable solution among all solutions that I've seen so far. Because it's cloud-based, it's really quick to roll out to 1,000, 10,000, or 100,000 endpoints. You can scale it depending on how many endpoints you've got. It is a good solution.

We have about 10 customers who use this solution.

The solution is in the cloud and this allows for the scalability to be very good.

We use this solution worldwide and we have approximately 80,000 people using it.

We haven't had any issues when it comes to scalability. We have thirty to forty users.

Scalability is good. We have had no issues with it.

Currently, we have about 4800 resources in the cloud.

It scales quite well because it's cloud-based and subscription-based. It can scale pretty quickly.

We haven't experienced any issues relating to scalability.

It is very scalable. It can be used for 10,000 endpoint users. So, it is very scalable in terms of volume.

CrowdStrike Falcon is scalable. We were able to deploy it in a 5,000 hosts environment it is easy to scale.

We plan to increase usage in the future. We are always looking for new clients.

The solution is scalable, but price and support are a bit of a challenge.

The solution is scalable to multiple thousands of systems at once. There is no restriction for that.

From my understanding, CrowdStrike is scalable as it's a cloud solution. 

This is not an area that we have fully explored as we have less than 20 end-points.

It is a scalable solution.