With CrowdStrike, we have found that there are a few missed detections. We would not say it is completely reliable or 100% reliable, however, the ratio of missed detection is more in CrowdStrike. In SentinelOne, we found that it was more accurate. We are seeing it act more efficiently.

The stability is great and we haven't had a single issue.

The solution is stable and we have used it for more than 2500+ hosts.

The stability has been fantastic. I have had no stability issues at all. It has never caused a problem of any sort that we have had across in the organization for a PC "acting funny" kind of ticket coming in. Those have never been CrowdStrike agents.

Because this is a cloud-native solution, it provides us with flexibility and always-on protection. That is just the nature of what SaaS applications are. In a very general sense, I wasn't looking at CrowdStrike because it is a SaaS application. That has been a minor point to me. Just one of those, "Oh yeah, your SaaS." It is almost expected nowadays with a lot of your more modern XDR platforms that it has to be always-on, 99.999 percent uptime.

As far as general maintenance, it makes it a bit easier as far as overhead. If there were servers onsite, we would have to take care of those as well as the care and feeding of them. Making it SaaS does make it easier, which provides us some extra man-hours as far as taking care of the hardware behind running it. There is that added benefit, which is nice. The configuration of the agents probably makes it a bit more automated, so that is nice as well. These are just secondary points to me. If we had to do the maintenance, I would be perfectly happy with doing it.

All our security team monitors it. There are five of us in the console daily actively using it. I am probably the only true administrator who will change policies or anything like that in there.

A couple people have access outside of the security team, but I have not seen them login. We have a couple of our server admins have access where they have view rights, but they don't go in because they don't have issues. One or two people on our Citrix team have access, but they don't go in either. Also, one or two of our end users might have access.

The solution is stable enough. We have not had any downtime. The only issue is if we have issues with the internet connectivity. 

I have never had an issue with stability at my current organization. At my previous employer, there was one issue with an auto upgrade where it caused some issues, but it was resolved quickly.

CrowdStrike is a vast improvement compared to our previous solution, where we had to spend a lot of time. For example, when the client had to be upgraded, it was a three-to-six-month project with people having to spend dedicated time to roll it out in waves, then deal with issues when a client's machine didn't upgrade correctly. Now, upgrades happen automatically. We turned auto updates on and have never needed to look back. Nobody has to spend any time on it.

I honestly cannot tell you the last time I have heard about a CrowdStrike agent issue causing an outage on a machine or server at the end of the day.

The stability is very stable. There have been no issues.

We have automated all our CrowdStrike Falcon updates.

CrowdStrike Falcon is a stable solution.  

I rate CrowdStrike Falcon ten out of ten for stability. 

Falcon is a highly stable product.

I would rate the stability of CrowdStrike Falcon a nine out of ten. The only issue I have had is with an old version of the endpoint that was installed and has proven to be problematic. 

The solution has never failed. The only false positives that we get are ones that we test with. I do true and false positive testing every month to make sure stuff is working correctly and the solution picks up on it. 

This is a very stable solution. I'd rate the solution 9 out of 10. 

In the three years of using CrowdStrike Falcon, we have not encountered any stability issues.

I haven't had any issues for five months since we've installed it, which is good to know. No users have complained about any CPU spikes or false positives, which we like.

We have had no issues at all with stability, and no conflicts on any of our endpoints or servers.

Stability has been really good. We have not seen the issues that we had with traditional AV. Having it connected to the cloud has really helped with stability, being able to see what a computer is doing at all times, and being able to see the last check-in times, this has kind of helped with the sensors.

It is primarily just me for tweaking or management of the solution. I have backups, if needed, but it is such a light lift that I may spend an hour or two a week in the console. It really is a great product that takes care of itself. Not a lot of tweaking has been needed so far, knock on wood. We haven't really had to make any exclusions like we used to with traditional AV. Everything is running with CrowdStrike's full protection, which is a huge bonus for us, since traditionally you are pretty blind. 

Stability-wise, they are very advanced in the next-gen antivirus game. CrowdStrike Falcon is always available.

We haven't had any stability issues. 

The solution is stable with no issues. 

We have only used the solution for three months so will continue to monitor stability for the next several months. 

I rate stability an eight out of ten. 

I would rate the stability of CrowdStrike Falcon nine out of ten.

I would rate the stability of CrowdStrike Falcon 8 out of 10.

My impressions of the stability are positive. I haven't had any problems since implementation with stability or availability.

Minimal maintenance is required on our side post-deployment, but it still does require maintenance. If I have to build out new groups or a troubleshooting group, e.g., tweaking policies if machines change subnets, then there is still maintenance required.

All post-implementation maintenance and administration is handled by a single security engineer.

It is a stable product.

Crowdstrike Falcon demonstrates exceptional stability once it has been properly configured with the appropriate settings. While there may be a period of adaptation and configuration required to ensure optimal performance, once the solution is in place, it operates with remarkable stability. Users can rely on Crowdstrike Falcon to consistently deliver reliable and secure protection without significant disruptions or instability.

Falcon is pretty stable - we haven't seen any kinds of performance issues like lagging, which we did experience with other endpoint protection solutions.

It has been very stable. There have been no real issues that we have had in the deployment or use of the CrowdStrike system in general. There has been zero downtime.

For our workstations, we don't worry about the updates. However, we have a tighter grip on updates for our server environment only because there was an issue at a point with one update. Since then, we would like to keep our deployments at an N-1. So, there is more of a check built-in just to make sure that the latest and greatest doesn't actually break anything unintentionally.

The CrowdStrike sensor is always kept at N-1 for our production servers. Our test servers are always up to date.

I have two engineers that regularly watch everything. We all get alerts. We'll see if something gets isolated, or a user will tell us. We isolate the issues and work on them so nothing gets through the endpoints into the system. Within 30 minutes to an hour, an issue can be cleared.

It's therefore very stable. We're able to catch everything before it can get it. It's reliable for sure.

They're so pro-active there's very little intervention that we have to do on our end.

It is a stable solution. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

There is no doubt about the stability of the solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

The solution is stable.

It's very stable and the whole management console is fast. 

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

There are no questions about stability. I continue to see, especially in the last six months, that CrowdStrike is making very purposeful acquisitions to tactically and strategically build upon the platform. Many companies acquire smaller companies to get a fraction of a piece of technology that tends to be an add-on or something that may compliment the core product, but CrowdStrike is making more strategic moves to acquire technology that they can directly integrate into the existing platform to make it even better and more effective.

Updates can be handled one of a number of ways. This is something that has evolved quite a bit since I initially deployed it. Initially, you simply had the option of manually upgrading sensor versions or leaving them to automatically update as soon as a new update was released. Very infrequently, there have been issues with sensor builds. Early last year, they rolled out the ability to automate the sensor revision updates, but do it in a tiered fashion. So, there was an N-1 and an N-2. So, when they release a new version, I step back my releases and deployment of the updates by one version backwards. Then, I have a few early adopters who get the latest sensor build as soon as it is deployed. Provided there are no problems, when the next release happens, the N-1 version will automatically upstep my entire environment without having to put hands on it.

This product does not require any maintenance post-deployment.

From my understanding and observation, it is a stable product, but I have been using this product only for the last two to three months. I am just in the learning phase.

It is a very stable solution. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

This is a stable solution. I would rate it a five out of five. 

The stability is very good. I can't complain about it. The only concern would be pricing. For this market, it's mostly SMEs and mid-market that we would target, and many would be those looking for antivirus or endpoint security.

CrowdStrike Falcon is a highly stable solution. We have not had any performance or compatibility problems.

I have not had any stability issues with CrowdStrike Falcon.

While we encountered some bugs with on-demand scanning, the overall performance and stability of the system are positive. CrowdStrike Falcon is less resource-intensive than our old McAfee solution, which often led to performance complaints due to its high memory consumption.

The product is rock solid. I've never had an issue with stability. It is reliable and the performance is good. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

CrowdStrike is very stable, we've had very few technical issues. The false positive rate is average. It has been very easy to manage and to determine where issues are.

In terms of stability, it's a great tool.

This is a stable solution, I'm unaware of any failures. 

The product's stability is good. 

This is a stable solution as it is cloud based. We have 3000 users making use of it. 

I would rate the stability of CrowdStrike Falcon ten out of ten.

CrowdStrike is highly stable.

The stability of CrowdStrike Falcon is great, I have never had the slightest problems.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable. 

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

The stability has been fantastic. We have never had an outage. There are no bugs or glitches. The performance is great.

The performance could be better. It's a little bit slow. 

It's not very stable. We can't seem to support the latest version.

The solution looks very stable. 

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

We haven't experienced any issues regarding the stability of CrowdStrike Falcon.

The product is stable as a rock. I have never seen any crashes. When it came to patching updates, we were always notified. It is not Windows-based, but rather Linux or Unix-based. It was more stable than any Windows product.

The stability of the solution is excellent, especially in a market like India.

CrowdStrike Falcon is a stable solution. However, you need to good internet connection for functionality.

The stability of the solution varies, several weeks ago I had some difficulties deploying CrowdStrike. It may have been a bug in the latest update, but a few days later this problem was solved. Sometimes there are issues and CrowdStrike deals with them very quickly. 

The stability may be too early to judge, as we are still in a POC. However, when we see the product, it is very, very stable.

Crowdstrike Falcon XDR is a highly stable solution.

Yes, CrowdStrike is stable.

The solution is stable.

The stability is good; we haven't experienced any glitches or bugs.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

CrowdStrike Falcon XDR is a very stable solution.

Falcon hasn't missed any attacks - it's very stable and reliable.

This is a stable product.

The solution is very stable. We don't find there are any bugs or glitches. We haven't had it crash or freeze on us. It's quite reliable.

The stability is around ninety-eight percent. The other two percent deals directly with the node being unable to detect as normal.

The stability is amazing, and we don't have any issues.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

It manages around a few thousand endpoints and servers in our environment, and it is doing well so far.

The solution offers great stability. I have faced no issues with the tool.

Overall, CrowdStrike Falcon is a stable product. My company is satisfied with its stability.

This is a stable solution. 

Crowdstrike Falcon XDR is a stable product. 

I find CrowdStrike Falcon a stable solution.

So far, it's been 100% stable. Besides the very lightweight agent, it's all Cloud-based, so I haven't had any downtime.

It seems stable. The performance is good.

It is extremely stable. It has been around for many years. We have been a customer for almost five years.

CrowdStrike Falcon is stable.

CrowdStrike Falcon is very stable.

So far, the solution has been stable. It did not clash with any other product that we have. Also, it is very light, and the users do not have the impression that anything is slowing down their system.

It is stable.

CrowdStrike Falcon is a new product and it is too soon to give a full report on the stability. We receive updates all time, and it has been more frequent than other solutions, such as Symantec. However, it has been somewhat stable and in a few months, I expect it to be even better.

It's very stable, we haven't had any issues so far.

It is quite stable. However, whenever there is a feature release (upgrade) where we push to all the endpoints, it causes something to be blocked without us knowing.

We have not put that much stress on it, about 20 percent.

It's fairly stable. We haven't been having too many issues with that.

We have not faced any problems with the product.

The stability is good, it's compatible with most of our platform. The agent upgrade could be better, but it's more or less aligned with the platforms. We also use Mac OS on some endpoints. Mac is not always the reflection of the agent that is the latest.

The product is quite stable. 

The stability of CrowdStrike Falcon is very good. We have never had an issue.

The solution is stable.

The solution is pretty stable, and it does pretty accurate work. I have never encountered any issue in this dept.

It is stable.