I have used BeyondTrust before. 

We previously used BeyondTrust and Centrify, among other solutions.

BeyondTrust and LastPass were the two solutions I had used in the past.

In both organizations I have worked, they've used identity access management as Dell One Identity Manager, and for Privileged Access Management, CyberArk.

We basically used to have a separate Password Vault that was KeePass. 

With KeePass, there was a security incident in our organization where a few of the passwords got leaked, and then it was challenging to track how the leak happened. With all that considered, G-PAM or CyberArk Password Vault was considered the next solution to prevent these sorts of things from happening again.

I did not use a solution similar to CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault.

We didn't have a password vault solution before CyberArk. 

I work with BeyondTrust. BeyondTrust's UI and support are good and never lag. BeyondTrust is also cheaper. 

I did not previously use a different solution.

We use Teams for virtual meetings and storage, with SharePoint serving as the backend.

I've never liked the idea of using Zoom because the security was never great.

I have not used any other solution previously. CyberArk is what I learned first.

I have previously deployed and installed Thycotic as an alternate password vault solution, but I find CyberArk to be much better.

We did not have a previous solution.

We previously used Telos. We switched to CyberArk because it has features to deal with a large company that has a complex structure and many partners. 

I did not previously use a different solution.

Prior to CyberArk, we were using a Microsoft product, but it didn't fulfill our entire requirement. We adopted this new solution because it met all of our needs.

We previously used a different solution, and then we updated it; we did not switch.

Previously we used Fudo and jump servers with OTP. It is not the same, but from a security perspective, it is also quite good and less expensive.

We didn't really use a different solution. We use Fudo Security, but it's not for password management alone. It's more of an all-in-one solution. We still use it; it's cheap and it's a very simple solution in comparison to CyberArk.

We have had customers use a competitive product that CyberArk has replaced but it is not very common. It is not very easy to change your Privileged Access Management framework so easily.

CyberArk is fail-safe, it has a threat intelligence filter, and prevention threat attacks. That sets the product apart from others, and I think the other part is their ability to onboard a maximum number of resources like storage network, security, IoT devices, and RPAs. Its ability to pervasively onboard almost all critical privileges and resources across the organization is where it stands out in a really big way.

Previously I was using Centrify and One Identity. We switched because CyberArk has a lot of strength in my region. Some partners do not want to deploy CyberArk to their customers because they feel it will create competition when it comes to renewal. They don't want the price to be affected.

I used another solution before CyberArk and its limited functionalities were the main reason for switching. We chose CyberArk because of its great functionalities, the ability to be deployed granularly at a different scale for each function, and the ability to be deployed in a distributed infrastructure.

I did not previously use a different solution.