CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault Pricing
The product's licensing is yearly. I would rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
View full review »You need a large number of servers, and therefore it gets expensive to deploy the product.
The license is expensive. It costs us around $200 per user.
View full review »IS
IrmaShattuck
Program Manager at a recruiting/HR firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
At my previous company, my budget amount was $15,000, and we didn't spend all of that. It was a larger company than the one I'm with now. It was global. We didn't spend that or come anywhere near it. They're still adding on, and I know that CyberArk will be the solution that they're going to stick with. They were hybrid, and now they're all cloud.
Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
TM
Tasfamichael Mijena
Manager at OIB
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is a very expensive product.
I believe that the charges for maintenance and support are already included in CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's pricing policy.
Payments have to be made on a yearly basis toward the licensing costs of the solution.
I would say that the solution is expensive because it's only preferred by the top-tier companies involved in banking or insurance who have no problem with budgets for their cybersecurity. A medium or small-sized company would prefer to use some other solution over CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault.
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's pricing is reasonable. Since CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is an enterprise-level solution, its cost is higher than other solutions in the market. The solution comes with maintenance for the first year. However, after that, we need to pay for maintenance.
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault's licensing model is comparatively very easy. It has a single license. We can deploy the solution based on the particular solutions we need.
The product’s pricing is feasible for enterprise customers. The pricing is expensive for smaller businesses. You need to pay additional costs for service implementation and local support.
View full review »AD
Alexander Djuraev
Sales Engineer at Softprom by ERC
The solution is cost-effective for the features. In comparison, other vendors would charge extra for the same features. Also, its pricing model is based on the number of users rather than the number of servers. Thus, there are no additional costs. I rate its pricing a six or seven.
View full review »This is very costly software. However, I haven't really dug into the licensing. My organization gives all its employees a free license and therefore I don't have to worry about pricing. My organization is a partner with CyberArk also. Even so, we just have one instance as a practice instance.
View full review »CD
reviewer1702128
Senior Leader at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
There are no additional costs other than the standard licensing fees.
View full review »SS
reviewer1386330
Manager Engineering at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
CyberArk's license is too expensive. I rate it seven out of 10 for affordability.
View full review »DK
reviewer1797750
Information Security Engineer II at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The SaaS version of CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault is very expensive, but the on-premises version is relative, e.g. depending on the size of the environment, it can be a bit pricey, but it's relatively okay compared to the others. It's their SaaS solution that's expensive.
View full review »MN
reviewer1643352
Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.
View full review »GJ
reviewer1324719
PAM Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
CyberArk is very expensive and there are additional fees for add-ons.
View full review »FF
reviewer1584756
Senior Presale - BU Information Security at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It's an affordable platform.
It is not the cheapest solution available on the market, but if you want a good project, you need to have the value of the solution you are selecting.
In my opinion, it is a good compromise between the cost and the benefits. I think the price is fair.
View full review »AS
Américo Silva
System Administrator at Porto Editora
It is expensive, but the cost is justified considering the security it provides. Compared to other solutions, it is costly. We have not tried other solutions, but the price is high.
We only license Password Vault.
View full review »MB
reviewer1398690
Information Security Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten.
View full review »FG
reviewer2169219
Node.js Backend Developer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
CyberArk is more expensive than other solutions, but it's necessary when the company has contacts with other branches and partners.
View full review »PG
reviewer1455795
Technical Lead IMSS at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The licensing plan is either six months or one year — it's not on a monthly basis.
Every company will have a different license fee, but ultimately, it comes down to how many users you want to manage and how many companies you want to support. If you want three CPMs, then you'll need licensing for three. It's per-company, license-based.
SS
reviewer1386330
Manager Engineering at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
This product is very expensive.
View full review »DW
reviewer1329747
Security at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
On-prem CyberArk is pretty expensive. It's pricey and you get what you pay for. It's an incredible product for what it does, but it's significantly cheaper to go to the cloud.
View full review »GK
reviewer1226001
Consultant at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
This solution is expensive.
View full review »JF
reviewer1337610
Security Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The price of this solution is expensive.
View full review »MH
reviewer794646
Information Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Password Vault is much pricier than other solutions. A vendor team might struggle to explain why that price is justified. There are good alternatives that cost less.
View full review »OZ
Oleksiy Zaionchkovskyy
Lead Systems Architect at IT Specialist LLC
As far as I know, CyberArk changed its pricing policy for our region. Overall it was very expensive a few years ago, but now, just around a year ago, it became less expensive and it's easier for us to sell it.
View full review »There are costs in addition to the standard licensing. There is an implementation fee. Those are additional fees and the customer has the annual maintenance, the software, and whole maintenance cost added to that. So there are additional costs besides this standard license.
View full review »I think that it might be cheaper than the other competitors in our region.
View full review »MW
MariuszWalo
Presales Engineer/Network Security Technical Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The price is higher than the competition, but if the customer wants the best product for their company, they won't mind the price.
We have a permanent license. Licensing is based on how man users you have, so the pricing varies according to the size of the company.
View full review »Plan ahead regarding the licensing costs. You can get a better prices per license as the number of licenses increases. CyberArk is open to providing a test license so you can test any particular functionalities prior to buying the real license.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.