CyberArk PAS Other Solutions Considered

CoreAnalee82
Core Analyst/ Server Admin at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
The team that I'm on, we weren't leading up the investigative part. Our security group did that. They're the ones who brought CyberArk to us and said, "This is the one we're going to go with." There was actually another entity within our corporate parent company that had already been using it for about nine months before we did. We adopted it from there. Since then, another entity has adopted it as well. View full review »
Securitye790
Security Architect at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
We did not evaluate other solutions. We automatically went with CyberArk. View full review »
GerryOwens
Founder at GoTab IT Risk Services
I've spent some time with BeyondTrust. I've spent some time with Centrify. I've had their products in for different instances and different purposes. They play an interesting concentric role in some of the areas that they focus on, but I wouldn't say I have one-to-one experience in other product sets. View full review »
Learn what your peers think about CyberArk PAS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2020.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Rahsaan Knights
Information Security Analyst III at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
Avecto was the competitor. They integrated with McAfee ePO, which was our endpoint solution at the time. Unfortunately, it was not as robust as I thought it would be. I didn't like it. I felt like the product relied too much on McAfee to do what it needed to do. Whereas, CyberArk was a standalone client which was way more robust. The competition was utilizing a product that we are getting rid of in two weeks. View full review »
DavidPoints
Associate Director of IAM at INTL FCStone Inc.
In a previous life, I worked with TPAM, Quest products, and Safeguard. We evaluated five different toolsets when it came to my new role here — all the major players. The last two were Quest and CyberArk and I had a strong relationship with both groups. A lot of it came down to dollars and cents, but CyberArk also had that marketplace that told us that we could do certain things out-of-the-box. That was very important to us, enabling us to get stakeholders' buy-in: strategic alliances within our customers or the companies that we own. We got them bought-in to the idea that they were going to be using this tool. It came down to the marketplace. View full review »
Sack Pephirom
Senior Security Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We looked at Leiberman, and also at Thycotic Secret Server. One main things that stood out about CyberArk would be the actual user interface. CyberArk's interface was better than the other two, and their price points were fairly similar. The usability and functionality were similar, so we looked at it from a user standpoint (the front-end of the tool), and CyberArk came out on top. View full review »
Sumit-Srivastava
Associate Vice President & Head of Apps Support at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
There were a few competitors we evaluated like CA Technologies, Arcos, Oracle, and Microsoft. View full review »
Director051a
Director Information Security at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
BridgitAmstrup
Cyber Security Manager at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
After evaluating several vendors, we found that CyberArk met our needs. View full review »
Eli Galindo
Data Security Analyst II at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
I do not have much experience with other solutions, so I don't think I can adequately compare and contrast it with others. View full review »
Technica06b9
Technical consultant at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We evaluated Thycotic and one other. View full review »
Varun_Sahu
Senior Associate at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
I have previous experience with BeyondTrust. And, there are other products, such as Lieberman and Arcos, which are being used in the Indian market because of its cost effectiveness. View full review »
reviewer990873
Information Security Engineer at a international affairs institute with 1,001-5,000 employees
I cannot tell what other options were evaluated. View full review »
Randhir-Singh
Principal Consultant, IAM Projects at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
I have previous experience with Oracle in the past. There is an ease of use with Oracle, because it is small and not very complex. You can wrap your work in a single day with Oracle. In comparison, the API is quite small with CyberArk. But, the product itself is so robust. View full review »
reviewer990921
IT Support Specialist / Project Lead at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
We looked at several different vendors and conducted detailed POCs on each to ensure we were getting what we needed. View full review »
Je’rid Mccormick
Associate Engineer I at COUNTRY Financial
Yes, my company did evaluate other options, but I was not with the company when this occurred. View full review »
reviewer988578
Snr Technical Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Yes, based on Gartner View full review »
Sumit Batabyal
Security Team Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I did not consider any other options. View full review »
reviewer1052523
User with 10,001+ employees
Yes, there was a POC which took place among BeyondTrust, Thycotic and CyberArk. View full review »
Learn what your peers think about CyberArk PAS. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2020.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.