CyberArk PAS Scalability

CoreAnalee82
Core Analyst/ Server Admin at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
We haven't scaled it up much since we took it on. From everything I've seen, I think scalability should be excellent. You can spin up as many component servers as you need to get the job done. Obviously, at some point, licensing is going to come into that. I don't see how scalability would be any kind of problem for anyone. I think you can make it as big or as little as you need it to be. View full review »
Securitye790
Security Architect at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
So far, it has been fantastic. We are a very large organization. We have approximately 110,000 employees and almost 20,000 accounts vaulted, where there is a lot of room for us to continue to grow. Even at the scale that we are at now, it has never had any kind of issues. We have never had any issues with deploying additional things. We do have some room to grow in some of our components servers if we need those, but everything that we have stood up so far has been operating flawlessly. We have not had any issues with our scale. It has been great. View full review »
Informatf452
Information security engineer/ business owner
I have worked with both CyberArk and what was formerly Xceedium and is now CA PAM, and in my opinion, I'm gung-ho CyberArk. CA PAM is not scalable like that at all. I love the fact that the different components can be installed in multitude or in singularity on different servers. I understand the concept of it being an appliance, and technically it is an appliance because of how CyberArk hardens everything. But the fact that I can put my vault here in a central location on one net for example, and I'll have a CPM in California, a CPM in Texas, a CPM in New York, a CPM in Florida, and actually be able to grow with my company and not necessarily have to continue to grow my vault until I get to a certain number accounts - yet I can still manage everything across the country, if not the world - I love that. I love the flexibility and the capability of being able to pull those components out. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, BeyondTrust, CA (A Broadcom Company) and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: September 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Rahsaan Knights
Information Security Analyst III at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
There are growing pains from integrating a software which allows you to do anything, and you could do anything but it is based on your environment. The software can do whatever it wants, but it is going to be reactive to your environment. Everyone will have a different experience. If this was a perfect world, you had a clean active directory environment, your SCCM solution was fantastic, and there were no firewall issues, the product would deploy. No problem. Read everything, and you are good to go. I could definitely understand. It is like designing the program for how it should work, then dealing with real life scenarios. You talk to any company here, and everyone's active directory is a mess. That is where you are trying to get your data from. That is where you struggle sometimes. However, the software is great. The Dev guys are on it as far as upgrades, etc. If they keep upgrading the software, they are going to be around for a long-time. We are a long-time customer. We have multiple products, and they are going towards the right direction because if we own three or four of their products, then we can meld them all into one and they all work together, which is great. View full review »
SeniorSeca1c
Senior server administrator at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is very scalable for an organization of our size, and I have talked with other CyberArk administrators running worldwide enterprises with CyberArk. View full review »
Sack Pephirom
Senior Security Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Scalability is pretty good. I have not had any issues with it. It should meet my company's needs in the future. View full review »
ITSecuri6676
IT Security Analyst at a mining and metals company with 10,001+ employees
The scalability is big. We are a large company, and there are only a few companies that can scale so well. View full review »
CyberA26c
CyberArk Consultant at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
The scalability is definitely very powerful. We did upgrade it, migrate it, a couple of times in the past. Previously I was involved in migrations and, of course, adding more resources, or more accounts - onboarding. It has been amazing. View full review »
Sumit-Srivastava
Associate Vice President & Head of Apps Support at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The software is scalable enough, so if we want to add more domains, we can just go ahead and do it. I don't see a challenge with that. There are a couple of other parts of the solution that we are not rolling out, but we'll be doing that. View full review »
Je’rid Mccormick
Associate Engineer I at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
The scalability is incredible. They just released Marketplace, and they are constantly releasing updates to the components and adding new components, like Conjur. This is something that we ran into with Secret Server and DevOps, so it is already scalable, but becoming more so in the future. View full review »
MasterSo7490
Master software engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
The scalability, sometimes, is lacking. It works really well for more static environments. I've been at places that had a really static environment and it works really well. You've got X number of CPMs and X number of PVWAs in your vault and everything gets up and going and it's smooth sailing. But for an environment where you're constantly spinning up new infrastructure or new endpoints, sometimes it has a hard time keeping up. View full review »
Identity1647
Identity and Access Management Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Scalability is great. We have no problems. We have a very large, diverse, global environment, and we have not run into any scalability issues. View full review »
Director051a
Director Information Security at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
We have no issues with scalability. We are using it in a pretty wide environment. We also use it in our business continuity environment with no issues. View full review »
Eli Galindo
Data Security Analyst II at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
We have not gotten to scalability yet, because we are still working on integrating our systems. We have a very minute portion of it. So, scalability will come afterwards, once we have everything there and we understand how much capacity we have used. As of now, scalability has not been an issue. The product should meet our needs in the future. View full review »
Principad996
Principal entity management engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
It's pretty scalable. Like I said, we just doubled our servers. If there are more users logging in, we'll probably go for a greater number of servers again. View full review »
Song Ye
Senior System Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees
We think it is good. That is why we moved to it. View full review »
Technica06b9
Technical consultant at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would rate scalability at seven or eight out of 10. There is a need to improve the usage on for the consumer side. I hope in the upcoming product, the version may fulfill this. View full review »
ITSecurif9a7
IT Security at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
It should be able to meet our needs going forward. I don't foresee us leveraging thousands more accounts than we already do. I think it will be fine. View full review »
Stephen Brittain
Security Analyst at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It has the ability to scale out. We have scaled out quite a bit with our product and use of it to get to multiple locations and businesses, so it has the breadth to do that. View full review »
ITSecuri170b
IT Security Specialist I at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It is pretty scalable. It should meet our needs in the future. View full review »
Maarten22
User at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
The environment is very easy to scale out. Especially running the CPM and PSM components in a load balanced virtual environment gives you the flexibility to quickly expand the environment. View full review »
Varun_Sahu
Senior Associate at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
The scalability provided by this solution is a lot better than some of the other available products on the market. View full review »
Dan Hines
Senior Technologist at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Scalability is impressive because you can set up clusters, so you can grow as your needs grow. View full review »
karthikrajaraj
Technical Director at Unique Performance Techsoft Pvt Ltd
Kevin Elwell
Security Analyst at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
The scalability has been good, and will meet our needs in five year's time. View full review »
SystemsA2327
Systems Admin II at a transportation company with 5,001-10,000 employees
It is meeting our needs now, and will still meet our needs in the future. View full review »
Ashish Pandey
Technical Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
With respect to scalability, it depends upon how much scalability you need in the moment. View full review »
reviewer990873
Information Security Engineer at a international affairs institute with 1,001-5,000 employees
Scalability is rather good, we haven't reached any technical limitations yet. View full review »
HimanshuPandey
Lead Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I have no scalability issues at the present time. View full review »
Randhir-Singh
Principal Consultant, IAM Projects at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
The scalability of the solution is good. We expanded, and we found the biggest part was a bit unfomfortable in terms of product. They are designing, leveraging the features so greater different markets are joined. On the ground it was difficult initially. View full review »
Jack Gammon
Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Scalability should not be an issue with us. Our implementation team sized it real well when we received it. We are a younger installation, so we have a long way to go. We have not seen the top end yet. View full review »
Je’rid Mccormick
Associate Engineer I at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
CyberArk is incredibly scalable. Make sure to check out the unlimited option. View full review »
reviewer990921
IT Support Specialist / Project Lead at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
This solution is very scalable from what we have seen. View full review »
reviewer990912
Senior Manager - Privileged Access Management at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Scalability is very good. View full review »
reviewer991878
Senior IT Security Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
It seems to work well for any size of organization, or any size of deployment in my experience. View full review »
it_user585702
Senior Consultant at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Yes. The OU limitations, noted above. View full review »
Gautam Mishra
IT Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product. View full review »
Sumit Batabyal
Security Team Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
It is scalable. We have added new equipment, and this solution has been relevant. View full review »
reviewer1052523
User with 10,001+ employees
Pretty scalable in the sense of PSM and storage. View full review »
Review874
Vice President - Cyber Security at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We have no issues with scalability. View full review »
it_user514779
Project Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
We haven't had issues with scalability. View full review »
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, BeyondTrust, CA (A Broadcom Company) and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: September 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Sign Up with Email