CyberArk Privileged Access Manager pros and cons

Vendor: CyberArk

4.4 out of 5

142 reviews
92% willing to recommend

3,625 followers

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pros review quotes

DM

Core Analyst/ Server Admin at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jul 19, 2018

CyberArk is not just an IT security or cybersecurity tool. It's also an administrator tool. I had a fair number of systems where the passwords were not fully managed by CyberArk yet, and they were expiring every 30 or 45 days. I was able to get management turned on for those accounts. From an administrator perspective, I didn't have to go back into those systems and manually change those passwords anymore. CyberArk... lightened the load on our administrative work.

Read full review

Assistant Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Jun 21, 2022

I'm no longer the product owner for PAM, but I can say that the most useful feature is the vault functionality, which keeps all your passwords secure in a digital vault.

Read full review

JA

reviewer1706796

Security Lead at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Oct 29, 2021

We've written over a hundred custom connectors ourselves that allow us to do all types of privileged session management for various applications. On top of that, the rest of the API-based central credential providers allow us to get away from credentials that may be hard-coded in the script or some application.

Read full review

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Free Report: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.

768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NR

Security Architect at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Jul 18, 2018

It has helped us with our adoption with other teams, and it has also helped us to integrate it at the ground level.

Read full review

NM

Information Security Leader at a government with 10,001+ employees

Dec 19, 2021

We also use CyberArk’s Secrets Manager. Because AWS is the biggest area for us, we have accounts in AWS that are being rotated by CyberArk. We also have a manual process for the most sensitive of our AWS accounts, like root accounts. We've used Secrets Manager on those and that has resulted in a significant risk reduction, as well.

Read full review

CH

Information security engineer/ business owner

Jul 19, 2018

I love the ability to customize the passwords: the forbidden characters, the length of the password, the number of capital, lowercase, and special characters. You can customize the password so that it tailor fits, for example, mainframes that can't have more than eight characters. You can say, "I want a random password that doesn't have these special characters, but it is exactly eight characters," so that it doesn't throw errors.

Read full review

GO

Founder at GoTab IT Risk Services

Dec 30, 2019

CyberArk is a very stable product and it's a stable product because it has a simple design and a simple architecture that allows you to leverage the economies of scale across the base of your infrastructure that you already have implemented. It doesn't really introduce any new complex pieces of infrastructure that would make it that much more difficult to scale.

Read full review

MM

Miguel Angel Muñoz

Security Advisory Services (SAS) Business Growth Lead for Iberia at DXC

Dec 23, 2021

It is a single tool that isolates possible kinds of malware. You get lateral movement blocking and auditing information, e.g., you know who is doing what. You are getting protections from the service as well as a useful environment. All your admins can easily go in and out of your company while accessing your servers in a secure way, even if they are working abroad.

Read full review

KC

Corporate Vice President at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Dec 15, 2019

When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution.

Read full review

RK

Rahsaan Knights

Information Security Analyst III at Mckesson

Jul 18, 2018

We can make a policy that affects everybody instantly.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 110)

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Cons review quotes

DM

Core Analyst/ Server Admin at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jul 19, 2018

This is probably a common thing, but they do ask for a lot of log files, a lot of information. They ask you to provide a lot of information to them before they're willing to give you anything at all upfront. It would be better if they were a little more give-and-take upfront: "Why don't you try these couple of things while we take your log files and stuff and go research them?" A little bit of that might be more helpful.

Read full review

Assistant Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Jun 21, 2022

When I was a component owner for PAM's Privileged Threat Analytics (PTA) component, what I wanted was a clear mapping to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, a framework which has a comprehensive list of use cases. We reached out to the vendor and asked them how much coverage they have of the uses cases found on MITRE, which would have given us a better view of things while I was the product owner. Unfortunately they did not have the capability of mapping onto MITRE's framework at that time.

Read full review

JA

reviewer1706796

Security Lead at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Oct 29, 2021

Many of the infrastructure folks who use the product dislike it because it complicates their workflow. They get a little less control, and they have to go through a specific solution. It proactively logs in for them, which obfuscates some of the issues that they may be troubleshooting.

Read full review

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Free Report: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.

768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

NR

Security Architect at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Jul 18, 2018

Having a centralized place to manage the solution has been something that I have always wanted, and they are starting to understand that and bring things back together.

Read full review

NM

Information Security Leader at a government with 10,001+ employees

Dec 19, 2021

If there is an area that has room for improvement, it's probably working with their support and getting people on the phone. That is hard to do with most products in general, but that seems to be the difficult area. The product is fantastic, but sometimes we want somebody on the phone.

Read full review

CH

Information security engineer/ business owner

Jul 19, 2018

We had an issue with the Copy feature... Apparently, in version 10, that Copy feature does not work. You actually have to click Show and then copy the password from within Show and then paste it. We've had a million tickets and we had to figure out a workaround to it.

Read full review

GO

Founder at GoTab IT Risk Services

Dec 30, 2019

CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms.

Read full review

MM

Miguel Angel Muñoz

Security Advisory Services (SAS) Business Growth Lead for Iberia at DXC

Dec 23, 2021

They are sometimes not flexible with things. For instance, from one day to another, there might be something that had been done years ago by CyberArk, then they say, "We do not support that." You then have to initiate a complaint and start working with them. Things might become complicated and months pass while you are working with them. Usually, they are good and fast, but sometimes they seem to be blocked with problems, e.g., you will suddenly be working with another team instead of the team that you were working with the day before.

Read full review

KC

Corporate Vice President at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees

Dec 15, 2019

The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time.

Read full review

RK

Rahsaan Knights

Information Security Analyst III at Mckesson

Jul 18, 2018

One of our current issues is a publishing issue. If we whitelist Google Chrome, all the events of Google Chrome should be gone. It is not happening.

Read full review

Show 10 more reviews (out of 104)

Product Categories

Product Categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

User Activity Monitoring

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Netgate pfSense vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Fortinet FortiClient vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Zscaler Internet Access vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Proofpoint Email Protection vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

SailPoint IdentityIQ vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Sophos UTM vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Okta Workforce Identity vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Omada Identity vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Auth0 vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Delinea Secret Server vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Arbor DDoS vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM)

User Activity Monitoring

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Netgate pfSense vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Fortinet FortiClient vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Zscaler Internet Access vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Proofpoint Email Protection vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

SailPoint IdentityIQ vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Sophos UTM vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Okta Workforce Identity vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Omada Identity vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Auth0 vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Delinea Secret Server vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

Arbor DDoS vs CyberArk Privileged Access Manager

See all alternatives

Related questions

14

CyberArk vs. ManageEngine Password Manager Pro

243

How does Sailpoint IdentityIQ compare with CyberArk PAM?

241

Which PAM tool do you prefer: CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Safeguard, Delinea Secret Server, or BeyondTrust Privileged Remote A

232

What is the difference between Privileged Users and Privileged Accounts

11

When evaluating Privileged Identity Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

180

Which is the best Privileged Account Management solution?

87

What are the top 5 PAM solutions that can be implemented which cover both hybrid and cloud?

288

What are the top 5 PAM solutions?

227

How will AI and ML help or work with PIM/PAM?

124

Is BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management really expensive compared to other tools or software?