CyberArk's PAM does what it's supposed to do, based on the interactions I've had with the folks from operations. There are the usual operational challenges, but it fulfills its basic purpose.

Stability assessments are conducted by a separate team that does risk assessments, so I don't have a lot of insight into this aspect, but considering that the product has been running for quite some time now and it's still the central solution for access management, I would reckon that it's a pretty stable product.

The product is very stable, limited only by the Windows Operating System is it built upon.

My implementation has been very stable over the past seven years, only having minor hiccups caused by "human error" during the "accidental" editing of a configuration file.

The solution is incredibly stable.

It is a stable solution. It is a top PAM solution as per Gartner.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is a stable solution.

The solution has been quite stable for many years and includes the functionality for clustering the multiple site replication, both of which we leverage for a high level of uptime.

The stability is great. We haven't had problems with it.

The solution is very stable; if instability is ever experienced it is likely to be as a result or symptom of a problem elsewhere, such as external factors (updates, network etc.).

It is a very stable solution. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. If you can read the manual and avoid making mistakes, it's very stable.

It seems to be doing everything it is supposed to, and we haven't had any serious issues. The few issues we have had were pretty quickly resolved.

In the last year, it has been a very stable platform.

The solution is very stable.

We no have had no performance issues; it's a really robust product. If I need more performance, I use another server, install another server, and improve our performance.

The solution has been very stable.

CyberArk PAM is stable.

We are very stringent on the performance metrics and would rate the solution very high. It's stable. 

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is a stable solution.

The stability is very good. There are no problems with it.

It's stable. There are no bugs or glitches. It's reliable. It does not crash or freeze. 

Not every product is 100 percent stable. CyberArk does have some issues once in a while. But the core product, the vault system, has been extremely stable. We haven't had a single problem since we got this thing deployed, and it's been more than six years now. We've not had a single problem with the vault. 

Related to the software, there are other things that can cause problems. You could have clusters going down or you could have issues with hardware, but the product itself has been very stable. 

There are the usual quirks you have sometimes with PSM, but it's been a very stable product for what we need it to be.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is a stable and reliable solution.

Beyond the servers and security devices necessary to run CyberArk, it maintains surprisingly few dependencies. It is capable of secure hardening with the capacity for multiple failovers that can exist and work without the use of LDAPs or external databases. CyberArk has been the most stable platform I have ever worked on and our redundancies allow for 100% uptime.

The number of users is about 3,305, and it is stable. We don't have any small clients, mainly medium and enterprise businesses.

I would rate stability a ten out of ten, and it's very stable.

The solution is extremely stable.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is stable.

The product is relatively stable, but as with most software, it has room for improvement.

It has been pretty stable. We had some issues before, but customer support has been helping us out quite a bit. 

We think we had some PSM issues, and that was the big problem we had. Basically, it had to be rebuilt.

Stability is fine so far, other than a couple of phishes every once in a while.

The stability is really good.

It is stable. We never had any hiccups that were caused by CyberArk.

So far, we don't have any problems. We have implemented higher availability in CyberArk. So, maintenance or updates don't have an impact on our environment. We don't have performance problems or anything like that. The stability is very high.

I have had no problem with agility in this solution. Everything works fine and gives us an opportunity to act as we want.

The product has been around forever. In a way, it's a bit old-school. I came from a Windows Server environment, so I get how it's built. It's INI files, it's apps that run on Windows Servers. I'm sure there are other ways that it runs, such as in the cloud as well. There are other directions. But the base of the product is old-school. It just works. So the stability is there. My new engineers can do the install, they can understand how it works. It's quite stable.

It is pretty stable because we have not moved to the new version. When it comes out, we don't want to go to the newest version the right away because we do not know if it is stable or not. We do not want to put it in the production yet, so we want to wait until the next one comes out, then we go from there.

We have not had any downtime with the product. No issues yet.

This is where we have had some woes with this software. Part of it is in our environment, and what we built it in as far as our database server. We met the requirements and it had some issues. The software is still growing and getting better. It is not 100 percent there yet, but even so, there is nothing in comparison to the product. It is too robust. It offers too many features that nothing else does. You might as well deal with it. You are going to deal with implementation and memory issues regardless that we had on the SQL Server, etc.

Part of this will come from your personal environment, but CyberArk has done a great job with it. However, they still have a ways to go. One thing I really like with every upgrade, they listen to the people. If you are saying this needs to be fixed, they listen. They usually put it in the upgrade, so that is cool.

So far, so good. We have not had any downtime. We do not want to jinx it.

It's a stable product. 

We have deployed CyberArk for two years, and so far, we haven't received any issues regarding any bugs or anything like that. We haven't faced any issues. There are some challenges regarding user access. We have to explain to users who are not familiar with the PAM solution what to do, however, regarding stability, or regarding bugs we haven't faced any issues.

The solution is very stable. It's reliable and the performance is good. 

The solution is stable, but some features in BeyondTrust are unavailable in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager. For example, there is a PMUL feature in BeyondTrust where you can do a deeper dive with the keys for login, but it is not available in CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

Its stability is very good. It is a very robust and stable product if you have the correct installation and configuration. Otherwise, you would have problems.

The stability is very good. We never had any crash in eight years.

Stability is overall good. However, there are many error messages that are like false-positive - they do not produce any issue yet logs are full of information.

The solution is stable.

The solution is stable and reliable. 

I haven't been faced with intermittent bugs like I do on One Identity.

With CyberArk, we rarely get those situations. It's a very, very stable software. You rarely need to raise any bug or service request with them.

It is a stable solution for our needs.

It is stable. They have had subsequent releases with patches for bugs. 

Stability is very, very good. We did have a minor incident. It could have been a major incident. The customer support people were spot on in getting us back in order pretty quickly. I think it's a little bug in the version that we're at. That's one of the reasons we need to upgrade right now. We're just trying to decide which version we want to upgrade to before we pull the trigger.

Beyond that, as far as stability and reliability, there really haven't been any major issues. We've had one little incident. We got it mitigated within a very short amount of time thanks to, on that day, really good, quick tech support from CyberArk. And beyond that, it's been a very stable and reliable system. There hasn't been any other downtime that I can point to and say it was CyberArk's fault.

I painted myself into the corner a couple of times, and had to jump through some hoops to get myself back out; those were my fault, a lack of experience.

For the most part, over the two and a half years we've used it, we've just had that one little incident that caused us a little bit of concern. Like I said, it was mitigated very quickly and didn't cause a huge storm within the company and didn't have a huge impact that particular day, fortunately.

It is very stable. We have not had any issues. There is a lot of redundancy that you can build into the product, so it's a very solid product.

This solution is very stable with the ability of satellite vaults and HA.

It is very stable. We are going to upgrade by the end of this year, if not early next year, to the most recent version 10.12.

I would rate the tool’s stability a ten out of ten. It is stable.

We have noticed some stability issues with the PSM Servers. We've noticed that there may be a limitation on the number of users that a PSM Server can handle. We have two PSM Servers deployed in our Production environment and have come to a conclusion that we may need to add two more to stabilize the environment.

Upgrading to version 9.9 significantly reduced the stability issues with the PSM Servers and the limitation on the number of users that the PSM can handle.

The solution is very stable. 

Once the project installation was done, we put this product into the environment based on the policies that we defined, but it had initial hiccups. The policies that we defined might have hampered and raised issues, but the product is very stable.

The perceived stability of CyberArk is quite dependent on the complexity of the environment it is implemented in, and the overall design of the infrastructure, including both PSM and Vault technologies.  As an infrastructure it is quite stable; however, in complex network infrastructure environments, sporadic network disruptions could create issues accessing the various CyberArk network devices.

The vault is almost a set-and-forget solution. Once the vault has been installed and configured, not much needs to be done in there apart from the occasional upgrade.

Stability is pretty good. I have not had any issues with it.

Prior to version 10, I was gung-ho CyberArk. I wish we would have waited until version 10.7 as opposed to 10.3. But for the most part it's stable, it's just that there are glitches in the matrix right now. We'll have to work those out.

Stability is great, especially as the product matures. I have been using CyberArk since version 4. We currently are using version 9 in our production environment, and are looking to deploy version 10. Version 9 is very stable compared to the previous versions. 

The solution has high availability.

It has been stable. We have not had too many issues with it or any downtime.

So far it has been absolutely wonderful. Of course, the initial glitches, the initial testing, the adjustments in implementation are there. It takes a lot of effort but, once it was all set and it started doing its processes, I haven't seen any concerns or issues.

We haven't had any post-implementation downtime at all, because we have our infrastructure set up in a way that we have active-passive standby on the CPMs. We have PVWAs in a load-balanced environment, we have multiple PSMs in a load-balanced environment as well. They compliment each other, so even if there is work or maintenance happening on one of the components, the other component is there to provide support, and ongoing access to all the users, without having any downtime.

It is phenomenal. We have three data centers across the United States. This was last year or the year before, we had one of our data centers altogether go out, and a very large amount of our critical applications went down. CyberArk stayed up the entire time. We had redundancy in another data center and we had disaster recovery plans already set up and ready to go. In that time, when everything was so hectic and everybody was scrambling, trying to get the data center back up and available, they were able to access the privileged credentials that they needed because our solution remained up and available.

This was a huge for us. To have the users of the system feel that it is stable, trustworthy, and dependable. We have had great success with the disaster recovery functionality that we have with CyberArk vault. We test it frequently, and it is stable for us. We have been very pleased with the stability of the solution.

Stability is rock solid.

So far, so good with stability. We have done a couple disaster recovery exercises with CyberArk, and they have gone according to plan.

Earlier in 9.0 version I faced some stability issues, yes there are some stability issues with CyberArk such as memory leakage, password unsync etc. These are some common problems but frustrating. In this version of CyberArk, memory leakage is a quite common and frequent issue which lend up access issue to end users.

It is very stable. We have had no downtime.

My impression of the solution's stability, in general, is very positive. It's quite robust. There are mechanisms in place that allow you to have high availability and that allow you to have proper disaster recovery. Those mechanisms are very solid, as we have tested them extensively within our processes to assess the risk associated with the use of CyberArk. They have performed very well.

The only thing that is lacking with respect to the stability is the scalability issue. The amount of data we need processed is too big for CyberArk to manage properly. That mostly impacts performance, not the stability, but to some extent the stability has suffered due to that. 

But overall, I would rate it very good in terms of stability. We had a minor issue once and, other than that, we have been online the whole time that I have been here. We have tested it thoroughly and have not found any situation where it would become too unstable to perform our tasks.

It is very stable. We have never had any downtime; no issues. We worked with support on several upgrades, and are looking forward to the 10.x upgrade.

The stability has been very good.

If there are stability issues, most of the time this relates to the companies infrastructure.

I have not really encountered any issues with stability.

The product is stable. If you make some changes or something, it's stable.

Once the implementation is completed and the solution is hardened, I consider it to be stable. 

No scalability issues.

Its' quite stable.

We have implemented our own redundancy into the product. That has worked for us very well.

So far, we haven't seen any major hurdles. We haven't had any downtime because of CyberArk.

It’s a very stable product. I haven’t encountered any stability issues.

Some improvements could be made to the PSM service. However, this could also be a problem with how Microsoft RDS functions, rather than the PSM services.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is stable.

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is stable.

Very stable with no own goals in three years.

We have not had any stability issues so far. We have not had any serious downtime. We do see performance issues with PSM which gets very busy, and we just keep scaling the number of PSMs. When many people log in at the same time, we have some issues with connecting through PSM. We doubled our PSM software and it's better now.

It is very stable. We started off on version 7, moved to 8, to 9, and now we're moving to 10, and each revision has brought about an increase in confidence and stability.

I am very impressed with the stability, but I still need to convince some colleagues.

It has been pretty stable. No ongoing issues; only one-off, and CyberArk support has been pretty good for support.

There is dependency on Windows tasks and if any AD GPO changes are pushed, it affects the system and stops working.

Stability is a huge concern right now. We are on a version which is very unstable. We have to upgrade to stabilize it. It is fine, but the problem is we have to hire CyberArk to do the upgrade. This costs money, and it is their bug. Our management is very upset about it.

CyberArk has been helping out, and it has been okay. However, the stability is definitely a concern, because with PSM, it becomes more critical to have it up. All of a sudden you have to have PSM up to be able to do your work.

The stability issues started when we upgraded from 9.7 to 9.95. Then, we were told during one of our cases that there was a bug in our new version and the only solution was to upgrade.

During the time that I have worked with CyberArk, I was able to conclude - based on experience and colleague stories - that this is one of the most stable products I have ever encountered. I have never seen any stability issue that was not related to a human error or a configuration issue.

Never encountered any problems with stability.

A very stable platform for small to extremely large and complex organisations and distributed networks.

In one of the projects for global MNC, we had successfully executed projects with distributed Vault in 16 countries spread across 5 continents. This is done with a centralized primary vault( on HA )- HQ Datacenter, which connected distributed local vault and PSM, along with DR in the cloud. 

All these years in none of our projects haven't come across product stability or system crash isuses due to cyberark software

It's quite stable so we've not faced any problems so far and it's been working smoothly for us. Initially, there were some technical issues, disconnections happening, and the slowness was there, but we've been able to overcome those challenges. Now for the past 15, 20 days, it's been running smoothly.

I would not say there is a stability issue. There are quite a few bugs, which I have discovered in versions 10.1 and 10.2, but I believe that was rectified out of scalability.

As no software is perfect, I don’t think it is any different with CyberArk. Their support, however, is able to tackle most of the problems. Sometimes patches are distributed. The CyberArk solution highly integrates with different platforms (Windows/Linux) and applications (AD, SIEM, email, etc.). So, not configuring it well can result in unexpected behavior. You need to consider the limitations of the platforms it is installed on, as well.

I have not encountered any stability issues.

So far, it is stable.

Rock solid! I would say it is, set it and forget it, but the vendor keeps on top of upgrades and enhancements.

We have not encountered any stability issues. After more than six years with my first CyberArk client, everything works great.

It is stable.

The stability, overall, is really good, outside of some of the RADIUS problems that we're having. Generally, it is very good.

We have not encountered any stability issues so far.

The product is very stable.

No issues.

There were no issues with stability.

I did not have stability issues.

It is a very stable and reliable product.

The solution is stable, it is very resilient.

No.

It is a stable product. 

In my seven years of experience with CyberArk products, I have never seen an unstable environment due to product functionality. It's always lack of proper planning, inexperience and faulty configuration that leads to an unstable environment.

I have not encountered any stability issues.

This solution is quite stable.

I did not encounter any issues with stability.

I think this solution has a lot of stability. 

CyberArk is stable.

CyberArk is quite stable and no issues have been exprienced on regards to stability.

No issues encountered.

I have no issues with stability. 

This was my first experience in the solution's UI and UX user experience and user interface. I didn't find the solution to be very stable at all.

No

There were no issues with stability. However, there were a few times when there were stability issues because the solution was deployed on a Windows platform.

CyberArk PAS is very stable.