Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response Previous Solutions

JB
Director of Learning and Development at ACA - Ateliers de conversation anglaise

We used BitDefender previously, but we decided to switch to Cybereason because it offers some new technology like AI. The company is growing and it looks promising. 

View full review »
Chad Kliewer - PeerSpot reviewer
Information Security Officer at PTCI

We had an antivirus or next-gen antivirus product before that was mostly managed by the vendor. We saw alerts, but really nothing else. We couldn't dig very far into those alerts, etc.

Cybereason has given me more coverage across more operating systems than what I have had in the past; I have more visibility now into a lot more areas. Before, I was seeing about half of my network. Now, I feel like I am seeing nearly all the devices. This was a huge thing for me when it came to changing our operations.

View full review »
MT
Senior Security Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

We previously used CrowdStrike. We switched because of the cost. We ended up doing more of a global licensing, which added something like 100,000 endpoints for our global contract, so the little bit of price difference ended up becoming quite large.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and others in EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
DH
Information Security Analyst at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

We were previously using Microsoft Defender.

We switched to Cybereason for its visibility and logs. Cybereason allows us to integrate a lot better with our SIEM solution. We can do threat hunting from one dashboard. It is a lot more manageable and flexible with a more in-depth view of our environment. It also has compatibility with multiple operating systems.

View full review »
TR
Information Security Manager at Cabot Financial (Marlin) Limited

The original team reviewed several alternative solutions. I had previously
looked at Carbon Black, Symantec and CrowdStrike.

View full review »
it_user821649 - PeerSpot reviewer
Global IT Project Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

For antivirus projects, we were using Windows Defender and Skype for previous platforms such as Windows 7. Now, we are still using Windows Defender.

For additional features or features that are redundant with Defender, we are using Cybereason.

View full review »
NL
Information Security Administrator at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Symantec was our previous provider. It was through tabletop exercises that we found that it just wasn't triggering alerts that it should have been, so it led us to review other products.

View full review »
TA
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

We also deal with BitDefender and Kaspersky.

I have some hands-on work with BitDefender and have completed some implementations.

Both Trend Micro and BitDefender have support for mailbox security. For example, they have specific functionality for securing Microsoft Exchange, or mailboxes in general. Cybereason doesn't have this option. The same is true for sandboxing capabilities.

View full review »
DS
Security Specialist at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

I previously used CylancePROTECT. In comparison, Cybereason is new, and has a couple of things which are not good. However, it detects false positives in the end and gives all of the information in a clear response. Its functionality is impressive.

View full review »
it_user1098648 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Consultant at Revel Tech Security Sdn Bhd

We have used normal branded AV, which does not seem to be effective nowadays. Adding products to make up for what is lacking can be costly and it will also affect the performance of the endpoint, adding more resources and also time to do an investigation manually. Ultimately, this will affect productivity.

As Cybereason, it is built as NGAV plus EDR, meaning that it is a multi-functional solution that addresses the effectiveness of countermeasures for any cyber attacks. It is an ever-evolving process.

View full review »
CL
Security Consultant at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

I previously used Trend Micro's antivirus solution.

View full review »
Buyer's Guide
EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and others in EDR (Endpoint Detection and Response). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.