I think Cybereason is highly scalable. If we added doubled, tripled, or quadrupled our team size, we could easily continue operations as normal with this solution. It's currently on all the endpoints, but we might increase our usage if we get more language training clients.

The product is 100% scalable.

I have just under 1,000 endpoints and have seen no issues whatsoever with scalability. It should have no problem going further.

It's very scalable. We've been able to roll out. When we went global to a very big chunk and it was very easy to do.

In our office, we have around 25,000 users. When we went global, we gained about 100,000 and then we just went private again a couple of weeks ago. So we're back down to 25,000. We've maxed out at a hundred and we're consistent in around 25.

Around 30 people on the security engineering, the SOC, threat hunting, and incident response teams use it. 

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response is a scalable solution, as we can add additional licenses to it without any issues.

For scalability, I would give them 9 out of 10. It is fairly easy to scale once you get going and are comfortable with it. It was our ability to get comfortable from not knowing how well it would interact with all our different operating systems.

Currently, there are only two individuals who are in it day-to-day. We have given access to our system administrators, but they don't really work with it much unless there are issues going on with the machines that they administer. So, they are not in the solution very often.

It is an easily scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Around 100 people in my company use Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response.

We're a big, complex company, and even so, with this solution, scalability is pretty straightforward. I'm not dealing directly with this part of the solution. However, if an additional detection service is needed or if we need more disk space, it seems really, really easy to expand. 

Scalability seems to be ok. It's supporting more than 200,000 devices and in terms of scaling, it's ok.

Scalability is endless, especially in a SaaS deployment. We scaled from zero to 2,900 in three weeks, and we saw no degradation in threat hunting query performance within the platform or any ill effects on the platform itself.

It does require maintenance for deploying upgraded sensors and for tweaking policies as new features come out. I don't think that would be maintenance. Upgrading endpoint sensors on mission critical device I recommend a maintenance window just to follow industry best practices, however all other devices can be completed during normal business hours.

It is possible to scale the solution. If your company needs to expand, it can do so. It’s not an issue.

It is scalable. We use this solution for over 20,000 workers who are employed at our company.

The scalability is good.