We employ Classic Area CoverPoint, in our setup. This configuration involves replication through a total of four appliances—two located in our headquarters office and another two at the disaster recovery site. This solution operates as CDP, which means it replicates data at the block level in real-time and the replication happens between our HQ office and the DLP. To ensure data integrity and availability, we utilize both synchronous and asynchronous replication modes, depending on the specific requirements of each scenario.

View full review »

We can replicate Data between Data Centers synchronously or asynchronously. We use it to provide Disaster and Recovery copies and migrate Data between Datacenters.

View full review »

We have been able to achieve a very low RTO & RPO with near real-time replication policies & adequately sized journals for a limited recovery time requirement to bring systems online as well as a great recovery point to roll back to in the event of a disaster or outage. View full review »

• Data replication with Recoverpoint over a long distance without FC is simple and delivers a cost reduction (ethernet DWDM is cheaper than fiber)
• Our site disaster recovery plan was simplified by scripting the failover procedure.
• Offloading the storage array with replication tasks was very useful to us because in the past our experience with Mirrorview /A icm with high data change rates was sometimes problematic.

View full review »

A traditional way of data protection is to perform backups. With a backup solution, we can implement Recovery Point Objectives (RPOs). However, we are not really sure how to reach Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs), especially when those RTOs have minimal values.

With RecoverPoint, we can "instantly mount" an image Point in Time in case of a problem. The RTO was improved, for sure.

View full review »

I worked as an IT manager and IT consultant. I have had many experiences with EMC and RecoverPoint. 

It has improved RTO and RPO. 

View full review »