Dell XtremIO Previous Solutions
JB
JohnBowling
IT Manager - Storage & Backup at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
We were using several other technologies prior to introducing XtremIO.
We switched because PoC testing proved the all-flash option to offer superior performance as compared to existing in-house technologies.
View full review »RR
RahulRukhaiyar
Technical Consultant at Fidelity International
I previously used SolidFire and NetApp. There is a third solution I have used called Violin Memory which is not used much, but it's a very good contender.
The advantages of Dell EMC XtremIO are the market share Dell has and dependability.
All the other solutions are going more towards iSCSI connectivity while Dell is moving away from iSCSI and towards XtremIO's that offer both iSCSI and FC. There is not much development for iSCSI, this is a limiting factor.
View full review »We were using Nimble Storage and HPE and had just purchased EMC Symmetrix VMAX 10k.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
All-Flash Storage
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Pure Storage, IBM and others in All-Flash Storage. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We did not have a previous solution.
View full review »We switched for performance and cost.
View full review »Mostly all VMAX, we switched for the consolidation of datacenter space.
View full review »Yes, we had a previous all flash array vendor, however we encountered many issues with support, scalability and a general lack of data efficiency services that ultimately were more important than all flash performance.
View full review »AW
Cela
Solutions Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We have a two vendor approach with HDS and EMC.
View full review »We had VDI running on another storage array. Thus, we switched to this solution so that we could utilize the speed and the inline deduplication.
View full review »Over my thirty years in the IT field, I have tried many solutions. I worked with:
- NetApp
- EMC SANs
- Direct attached SCSI drive units
- An IBM 4300 unit attached by VMware 2.5
CS
SystemsE5b74
Systems Engineer Senior at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We never ran VDI on any other storage platform, although we did have any other options available: NetApp, 7-Mode/cDOT, VMAX.
View full review »AN
reviewer173349
AGT Infrastructure Operations at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We did not use any other solution beforehand.
View full review »CT
ITOperatd6bc
IT Operations Manager at a energy/utilities company with 201-500 employees
We previously used deployed EMC VNX storage (and still use it for our lower performance applications) and before that, we had Dell EqualLogic. We switched to an all-flash array as we wanted high performance storage for our three most critical applications (Exchange, ERP and VDI). We wanted to do a full VDI platform for all our users and locations. We wanted the best experience for them, as any hiccup would mean a lower buy-in rate from them. This storage made that task much easier.
View full review »We used HPE and EMC storage arrays, but the main reason we switched was the positive business case. We have a lot more flexibility (VPLEX), reduction of cost and floor space (XtremIO), due to deduplication and compression.
View full review »RR
rrukhaiyar573
Technical Consultant at a recreational facilities/services company with 11-50 employees
We used to employ high-end and mid-range products from multiple vendors like EMC and NetApp before we switched to XtremIO for good performance and space economical-ability.
View full review »RJ
Ramandeep Jagde
Technical Specialist Storage at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Yes, we were using a VMAX solution before. This product was incorporated in order to get better performance at a reduced cost for our internal customers.
View full review »TB
Infotecharch67
IT Architect at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
We previously used another EMC program, but it was not flash only, so that's why we switched to this solution. It possible to buy an all-flash system and, based on the compression features, we changed to this unit.
View full review »DB
Darrell Breeden
Senior Developer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
We previously used a large NetApp array, but the issue was storage density. We were at the point where we couldn’t add any further disk shelves to the controllers.
View full review »We did have a previous solution. This allowed us to move to a smaller footprint with better performance.
View full review »We used EMC VMAX. Latency was inconsistent and it lacked cloning and deduplication.
View full review »We used EMC VMAX. We switched because EMC made it too costly to stay on VMAX and gave us discounts on XtremIO.
View full review »TD
Director7326
Director of Infrastructure Services at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Our customers switched from the older generation of VNX to XtremIO. It was ten times faster and deduplication/compression allowed for a much smaller footprint in the data center.
View full review »It was the company's choice to switch to this solution. I don't remember what we had beforehand. I think that they made the switch because we knew we were going to have a large amount of data. The data reduction deduplication that this solution offered was very valuable. We knew that if we were going to be doing an extremely high amount of the right operation, the inline data reduction would be valuable as well.
View full review »CO
Clovis Oliveira
Director at STORAGECORP Tecnologia
We also use PowerStore which we find easier to implement.
View full review »AW
Cela
Solutions Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
We are using HDS and EMC.
View full review »We were using VNX. The compression and deduplication numbers, as well as the level of effort needed to build RAID groups on this storage processor array to support workloads, caused us to consider XtremIO.
View full review »We had multiple tier storage without deduplication/compression. We switched due to cost and performance.
View full review »We used DAS Solutions. We were not getting the required IOPS and SAN stability, and that was a concern.
View full review »We previously used a VNX series storage array. The array was not as fast as an all-flash array.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
All-Flash Storage
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Pure Storage, IBM and others in All-Flash Storage. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.