I believe Cortex is scalable but only to a point. I couldn't see attempting to manage 1000+ users on it. Too many headaches to have to deal with that large a deployment. 

It is scalable. If I noticed that there wasn't any impact in performance, then I'd simply launch another instance and then cluster them together in order to provide shared resources between the two in a cluster. If a particular integration is misbehaving because there aren't sufficient resources on the one instance that we currently have, then I can detach that instance or that integration from the instance into its own VM. That way it has enough resources on another VM in order to actually run that integration.

There are 15 investigators using this solution. 

In terms of increasing usage, we're looking at bringing in our audit vulnerability and assessment team and having them do their vulnerability assessments from within the platform. I'm going to have to reach out to them to get them to start looking at the vulnerability layout, the incident type, the playbook, and the Nessus connectors in order to be able to have them perform that through XSOAR and then follow up through XSOAR with regards to remediation.

I haven’t seen any lag in terms of platform scalability. It scales to cover all the endpoints. Although, sometimes there are latencies for Panorama. It could be because there are a lot of legacy systems.

It is not a very scalable solution. Because of the implementation that we have within the device as it is metered by the number of even EPS that we are able to accept. At present, twelve users are using the solution as we are a government enterprise.

I rate the scalability a six out of ten.

We have six users actively using XSOAR. XSOAR is specifically for security teams, it is not for everyone to use.

It is a scalable solution. The best part was the working model when it transitioned from Demisto to Palo Alto Networks. Demisto had around 220 plus integrations when they launched. That was back in 2018 before it was acquired by Palo Alto Networks. But automation can be increased.

It is a scalable solution.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is a tool that is used only by me and my team in our company. The tool is mainly used by only two people in my company.

It offers some architecture recommendations to make it really scalable if you choose.

For example, hot standby, bond standby, clustering, and breaking out components in dedicated servers. You can go wild if you want to go wild, but we wanted to keep it easy and stable.

Pretty much network security and SOC are the main users. I believe that we are licensed for 20 users.

We are definitely extensively using this solution. We are currently training many additional teams to be self-sufficient in usage. The usage will increase more and more.

The solution is scalable. Internally, there are around ten to 12 people who use it. However, I am unsure of the exact number of external users.

The solution is quite scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so.

We haven't tried to scale, however, as per the technical documents which I have read, it should be understood by the customer before it is deployed. It all depends on how many integrations or how many triggering points a company has. You need to have an idea of the scope. Remediation can take a minute or two, however, it will still be possible. There isn't too much of a concern for scaling right now.

We have one or two customers using the solution for their own purposes. We are consulting with two more customers. We do plan to increase usage in the future. 

The tool is highly scalable. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten. There are ten users in our organization. The solution is used 24/7. We have a plan to increase the usage.

I rate the scalability of the solution as an eight out of ten.

The solution is extremely scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so easily.

Cortex XSOAR is scalable.

The solution is suitable for enterprise businesses.

Cortex XSOAR is generally scalable and I would rate the scalability an eight out of ten. It is a bit challenging to migrate it from a regular database to a high-availability Elastic database, but it is possible. The ease of migration depends on how well it was planned from the start. Overall, it is a good option for scalability, but careful planning is essential for smooth transitions. The engine, which acts as a broker for connections and integrations in Cortex XSOAR, is highly efficient and reliable.

I rate the solution's scalability a ten out of ten.

The scalability of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is fine for what we are using it for.

We have our SecOps department of user 50 people that are using the solution for alerts. We plan to increase usage in the future.

It is a scalable solution. I would rate scalability a ten out of ten. Our clients are enterprise businesses. 

We have approximately 1,000 users using Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR in our organization. The solution is scalable.

It is a scalable solution.

It is a scalable solution. There are two hundred users using the solution at present. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten. 

I'm not sure how scalable the solution is.

I rate the solution's scalability as an eight. It is complex to scale.

The solution is scalable. You have the ability to start from a small number of agents and go to any number of agents. Likely, small businesses will not need such a solution, however, if they will need it, and they need to grow, it can scale really well for them - so long as they have the money.

It is quite scalable. I would rate it a ten out of ten.

The existing model is good, but if we go for big deployments, I think there are a few challenges in scalability. They use their internal BoltDB, which is good for a medium organization, but for large organizations, they support Elasticsearch, which is too costly. The DR capabilities are not good.

It is a scalable solution. I rate its scalability an eight out of ten.

The product is scalable. It can integrate with a lot of products.

As far as I know, Cortex XSOAR's scalability is okay. I'm just a user, so I don't know.

The product is scalable. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten. At a managed service level, the product can really scale well. So far, it’s good. Our clients are small, medium and enterprise businesses.

The solution is scalable. We have already approximately 200 devices deployed into the cloud and we are planning to increase usage in the future. We have approximately 600 employees using this solution in my organization and the solution has been completely coordinating the logs of all these users well.

It is very scalable. It can be easily integrated with other third-party APIs.

I have found Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR to be scalable all the time.

My impression is that Demisto is scalable and it is capable of working across wide geography at any given point in time. The traffic comes in from everywhere in the world and this solution is able to identify threats ahead of time.

Our clients for this solution are medium-sized and enterprise-level businesses.