I would rate it 7 out of 10. 

The solution is very scalable. My company has 24,000 users. 

There are around a thousand end users using this solution. We use it once a week mostly. We have a weekly call to discuss the solution and work on automation for repetitive tasks.

It's hard to find a better container platform. So far, we haven't had any major issues with scalability or anything else.

The tool is scalable. We currently have four customers, each with approximately 20 users. We might need to increase usage in the future.

Its scalability is amazing. Scalability is one of the major use cases why people go for Mirantis. You can go from 1 to 100 in no time. It can be automated. With the kind of platform it is, it would make life so much easier for any organization. If you look at e-commerce companies, the workload is different every day. On Black Friday, you have three to four times more traffic than normal. In such cases, to scale, you need to have these kinds of tools so that scalability is seamless.

We have a lot of customers. If you look at the Fortune 500 companies, 60% to 70% of them are already using OpenStack.

It is a scalable solution. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. 

It was extensively used in our company. There were around a thousand end users using it. 

Scalability with Docker is another aspect of adoption. Although we are using OpenShift and Kubernetes sparingly, I think we're able to achieve more with Docker. The developers can scale.

Beyond that, Docker requires a lot of discipline and also pushing cultural change. It is technical in that you need to educate people about it. In terms of scale, I find the scalability more of a culture and discipline issue in our environment, rather than a technical issue. 

There are three types of people who are using Docker:

• The developers (those include QA as well), i.e. scrum teams.
• The business analysts.
• The product owners.

We have product roles: an implementation team and the architects. Those are the types of people who are using the Docker solution.

For every 30 people, we have around three people supporting the pipeline. This makes sure that the Docker files are up to date. They're the gold standard. If we are using Docker Compose, Docker Compose will supply it. 

We use Docker a lot. With any required file, they just need to make sure that the changes are up to date and there are no conflicts. 

We started with one team. Now able to scale it. In the current project, we started eight months back. We started with a six-member team. Now, there are eight plus 64 members using this platform. 

We have plans to increase usage to 3000 developers.

Very easy to use, all you need to have is the basic knowledge with Docker Compose.

The solution is definitely scalable, but only to some degree. For example, Mirantis did make an effort to get into the orchestration world by having Docker Swarm, but I don't think a lot of people use it because of the other orchestration tools available. I think that's where the scalability problem comes in.

But now with the Mirantis runtime being removed from Kubernetes, which is the industry-wide standard for orchestration of containers, I think it's going in a direction that is not super scalable. Also, with the recent licensing changing with Docker Desktop, a lot of companies are opting to stop using that and switching to another solution like Rancher Desktop, which gives you a UI. If you want to use Docker Desktop in a commercial environment, you have to pay a per user fee. It might be okay for conglomerates and enterprises, but it's not okay for midsize or small companies, because they're tight on budget.

I think there are some scalability issues from my point of view, from the business model and the tech model, and I think stepping out of Kubernetes is a huge setback.

There are currently 200+ people using this solution in my company. 

The solution is scalable.

We use the application to monitor and orchestrate any applications and workloads.

I rate the solution’s scalability a ten out of ten.

I rate Mirantis Container Cloud's scalability a ten on ten. I am the only one using it. 

The platform's scalability depends on the availability of resources. It is highly scalable if there is enough memory or storage space. A team of four to five executives from the CACD team uses Mirantis Container Cloud in our organization. They support all the deployments conducted by the rest of our engineers.

In my company, approximately 10 software engineers and developers are working directly on Docker Engine. In the infrastructure environment, we have two members, myself and another colleague. We build and manage the Docker environment and infrastructure. My main responsibility in my company is providing and developing container solutions, establish and supporting their Docker environment and orchestration systems.

The solution is scalable and we have plans to increase usage in the future.

The scalability is a bit difficult. Rackspace has beautiful tools to make scaling pretty easy. Usually, it is our customer that is afraid to scale too fast. At times, we have to convince our clients to move towards the cloud, because the cloud function is very different from the on premise solutions. Once they understand this, they are eager to jump to the next level. 

We currently have two customers that have 8,000 users connected to the solution. They are in the automotive industry. The users are a combination of sales people, service representatives and executives.  There is a tremendous ability for Docker to support a lot of users.

This solution scales very well, and it can be scaled to the entire infrastructure when required.

Three of my clients are currently using Docker, and all of them are involved in software development. One of my clients is in the process of scaling up, moving from ten to one hundred and fifty developers within the next six months.

I am not scaling it very much at this time. I only have about 20 users at present. The roles of the users are information users, managers and middle managers.

This solution is extremely scalable - we are able to spin off multiple instances very rapidly.

There have been no scalability issues. As a matter of fact, Docker itself can be used to help you scale up by allowing you to create a new environment quickly when you need more power, or if you want to deliver an instance closer to a customer.

I believe Docker is scalable.

The solution follows scalability of the application it handles. A monolite application will not become scalable as soon as it is dockerized without architecture change.